Quoting Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fri, 11 May 2007 16:25:00 +0100):
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 06:10:20PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 11:07:42PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 02:46:18PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 11:07:42PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 02:46:18PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 05:42:28PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 02:15:04PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
Well, we currently have an *NP* case as
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 06:10:20PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 11:07:42PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 02:46:18PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 05:42:28PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 02:15:04PM +0100, Ceri
Yar Tikhiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The funny fact is that now sshd(8) behaves consistently, and it's
partly due to my change. [...]
FWIW, although I was either too busy or too distracted to review Yar's
patch when he submitted it in March: as the maintainer of both PAM and
OpenSSH, I believe
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 02:46:18PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 05:42:28PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 02:15:04PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
Well, we currently have an *NP* case as per above, but not a *LK* case,
so I disagree somewhat.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 08:07:40PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:46:38PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 01:54:59PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
Hello, Yar Tikhiy!
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 06:39:01AM +, you wrote:
yar
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 02:15:04PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 08:07:40PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:46:38PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 01:54:59PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
Hello, Yar Tikhiy!
On Thu,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 05:42:28PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 02:15:04PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
Well, we currently have an *NP* case as per above, but not a *LK* case,
so I disagree somewhat.
Why? Now *LOCKED* in FreeBSD is nearly the same as *LK* in Solaris
Hello, Yar Tikhiy!
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 08:26:14PM +0400, you wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 01:54:59PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
Hello, Yar Tikhiy!
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 06:39:01AM +, you wrote:
yar 2007-04-26 06:39:01 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 04:17:49PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
Hello, Yar Tikhiy!
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 08:26:14PM +0400, you wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 01:54:59PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
Hello, Yar Tikhiy!
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 06:39:01AM +, you wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:46:38PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 01:54:59PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
Hello, Yar Tikhiy!
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 06:39:01AM +, you wrote:
yar 2007-04-26 06:39:01 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 01:54:59PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
Hello, Yar Tikhiy!
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 06:39:01AM +, you wrote:
yar 2007-04-26 06:39:01 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
lib/libpam/modules/pam_unix
yar 2007-04-26 06:39:01 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
lib/libpam/modules/pam_unix pam_unix.8 pam_unix.c
Log:
MFC:
pam_unix.c 1.52
pam_unix.8 1.13
In account management, verify whether the account has
Hello, Yar Tikhiy!
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 06:39:01AM +, you wrote:
yar 2007-04-26 06:39:01 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
lib/libpam/modules/pam_unix pam_unix.8 pam_unix.c
Log:
MFC:
pam_unix.c 1.52
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 01:54:59PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
Hello, Yar Tikhiy!
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 06:39:01AM +, you wrote:
yar 2007-04-26 06:39:01 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
lib/libpam/modules/pam_unix
Alexander, good day.
Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 01:54:59PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
In account management, verify whether the account has been locked
with `pw lock', so that it's impossible to log into a locked account
using an alternative authentication mechanism, such as an
yar 2007-03-27 09:59:15 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
lib/libpam/modules/pam_unix pam_unix.8 pam_unix.c
Log:
In account management, verify whether the account has been locked
with `pw lock', so that it's impossible to log into a locked account
using an
17 matches
Mail list logo
