Quoting Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Thu, 11 Oct 2007
16:01:26 -0400 (EDT)):
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 03:47:24PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Whatever happened to renumbering all symbol versioned libraries
to libfoo.0? Or even libfoo.0.0.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 09:29:57AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 01:16:03PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
David E. O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Log:
Repo copy libpthreads to libkse.
This introduces the WITHOUT_LIBKSE nob,
and changes
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 12:58:36PM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 09:29:57AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
Shipping a libkse.so.3 in 7.0, would be yet another FreeBSD weirdism as
folks may wonder where .1 2 are.
They are right here:
On Thursday 11 October 2007 01:28:23 pm David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 12:58:36PM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 09:29:57AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
Shipping a libkse.so.3 in 7.0, would be yet another FreeBSD weirdism as
folks may wonder where .1 2
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 02:22:43PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 11 October 2007 01:28:23 pm David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 12:58:36PM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 09:29:57AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
Shipping a libkse.so.3 in 7.0, would
Whatever happened to renumbering all symbol versioned libraries
to libfoo.0? Or even libfoo.0.0. The whole point of symbol
versioning is that we don't need to bump library versions
for ABI breakage.
--
DE
___
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 03:47:24PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Whatever happened to renumbering all symbol versioned libraries
to libfoo.0? Or even libfoo.0.0. The whole point of symbol
versioning is that we don't need to bump library versions
for ABI breakage.
That's what I'd like to see
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 03:47:24PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Whatever happened to renumbering all symbol versioned libraries
to libfoo.0? Or even libfoo.0.0. The whole point of symbol
versioning is that we don't need to bump library versions
for
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 12:55 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 03:47:24PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Whatever happened to renumbering all symbol versioned libraries
to libfoo.0? Or even libfoo.0.0. The whole point of symbol
versioning is that we don't need to bump
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 16:01 -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 03:47:24PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Whatever happened to renumbering all symbol versioned libraries
to libfoo.0? Or even libfoo.0.0. The whole point of symbol
On Thursday 11 October 2007 03:39:14 pm David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 02:22:43PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 11 October 2007 01:28:23 pm David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 12:58:36PM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 09:29:57AM
David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 02:22:43PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 11 October 2007 01:28:23 pm David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 12:58:36PM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 09:29:57AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
Shipping a
David E. O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Log:
Repo copy libpthreads to libkse.
This introduces the WITHOUT_LIBKSE nob,
and changes WITHOUT_LIBPTHREADS to mean with neither threading libs.
Approved by:re(kensmith)
Was the SHLIB_MAJOR regression for libkse (from 3 to 0)
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 01:16:03PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
David E. O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Log:
Repo copy libpthreads to libkse.
This introduces the WITHOUT_LIBKSE nob,
and changes WITHOUT_LIBPTHREADS to mean with neither threading libs.
Approved by:
obrien 2007-10-09 13:42:34 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
.Makefile.inc1 UPDATING
cddl/lib Makefile
cddl/usr.bin Makefile
cddl/usr.sbinMakefile
lib Makefile
lib/libkse
15 matches
Mail list logo
