Re: [cvsnt] Bug report: update fails on XP for empty XXX and full xxxdirectories

2009-12-20 Thread Arthur Barrett
Gabriel Genellina, > May I suggest using more "separate" version numbers? > For an outsider, 2.5.03 and 2.5.04 appear to be essentially the same > version, just with small bugs fixed. And a number like 2.6 means "new > features" not present in 2.5. At least that's what I would > expect without kn

Re: [cvsnt] Bug report: update fails on XP for empty XXX and full xxxdirectories

2009-12-20 Thread Gabriel Genellina
En Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:03:37 -0300, Arthur Barrett escribió: CVS client: (CVSNT) 2.5.03 (Scorpio) Build 2382 This is very very old - please upgrade (preferably to the 2.5.05 RC out later today), or 2.5.04 which is the current stable. May I suggest using more "separate" version numbers? For

Re: [cvsnt] Bug report: update fails on XP for empty XXX and full xxxdirectories

2009-12-20 Thread Arthur Barrett
Miklos, > CVS client: (CVSNT) 2.5.03 (Scorpio) Build 2382 This is very very old - please upgrade (preferably to the 2.5.05 RC out later today), or 2.5.04 which is the current stable. > You can very easily reproduce the bug by checking out the following > repository and updating it immediately: