Re: CXF on WebLogic 9.2

Kulp wrote: >> > On Jan 31, 2008 9:07 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> FYI: for 2.0.4, we specifically switched to the geronimo version >> >> as it does NOT have the QName class in it like the stax-api version >> >> that we used in

Re: CXF on WebLogic 9.2

It may be the xml-apis.jar. I'm not sure why we have it in lib. It shouldn't be needed. I'll try excluding it and seeing if things still build. Dan On Thursday 07 February 2008, chengas123 wrote: > Hi, > I'm afraid I'm getting the QName issue again. I have no idea as to > what was diffe

Re: CXF on WebLogic 9.2

> >> FYI: for 2.0.4, we specifically switched to the geronimo version as it >> does NOT have the QName class in it like the stax-api version that we >> used in 2.0.3 does. Thus, the problem should be reduced. >> >> Dan > > -- View this message in

Re: CXF on WebLogic 9.2

Hello, I've had a similar problem before and I think you can fix it with a prefer-web-inf-classes element in your weblogic.xml. See here: http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs92/webapp/weblogic_xml.html To set this on a server wide basis see here: http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs92/programming/classloadin

Re: CXF on WebLogic 9.2

FYI: for 2.0.4, we specifically switched to the geronimo version as it does NOT have the QName class in it like the stax-api version that we used in 2.0.3 does. Thus, the problem should be reduced. Dan On Thursday 31 January 2008, William Zhu wrote: > on CXF2.0.4, it's "geronimo-stax-api

Re: CXF on WebLogic 9.2

epartment of Computer Science > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | University of Sheffield, UK > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CXF-on-WebLogic-9.2-tp15193763p15214832.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: CXF on WebLogic 9.2

chengas123 wrote: I downloaded apache-cxf-2.0.4-incubator.tar.gz and could not find any file name stax-api.jar in the lib directory. 2.0.4 ships geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.jar instead, but this doesn't include the QName class so probably doesn't help you. Ian -- Ian Roberts

Re: CXF on WebLogic 9.2

; >> stax-api jar file is in \{CXF-home}\lib >> >> unpackage it, you will find the javax.xml.namespace.QName class. >> >> delete it, and re-package the file. >> >> try it. >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CXF-on-WebLogic

Re: CXF on WebLogic 9.2

javax.xml.namespace.QName class. >> >> delete it, and re-package the file. >> >> try it. >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CXF-on-WebLogic-9.2-tp15193763p15213728.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: CXF on WebLogic 9.2

i jar file is in \{CXF-home}\lib > > unpackage it, you will find the javax.xml.namespace.QName class. > > delete it, and re-package the file. > > try it. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CXF-on-WebLogic-9.2-tp15193763p15213356.html Sent f

Re: CXF on WebLogic 9.2

e-package the file. > > try it. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CXF-on-WebLogic-9.2-tp15193763p15213356.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: CXF on WebLogic 9.2

7;m not sure > this would fly in our production environment. > > Thanks, > Ben > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CXF-on-WebLogic-9.2-tp15193763p15213281.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: CXF on WebLogic 9.2

;80' >> My only guess is it's trying to validate a DTD or something and is being >> blocked by our corporate firewall. I have no idea how to tell weblogic >> about our proxy. Configuring the proxy would be a good short-term >> solution since it would allow d

Re: CXF on WebLogic 9.2

ld be a good short-term > solution since it would allow development to move forward. However, > ultimately I'm probably going to need another solution since I'm not sure > this would fly in our production environment. > > Thanks, > Ben > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CXF-on-WebLogic-9.2-tp15193763p15211777.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: CXF on WebLogic 9.2

123) > at > weblogic.management.deploy.internal.DeploymentServerService.resume(DeploymentServerService.java:173) > at > weblogic.management.deploy.internal.DeploymentServerService.start(DeploymentServerService.java:89) > at weblogic.t3.srvr.SubsystemRequest.run(SubsystemRequest.java:64) > at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209) > at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:181) > > > > > chengas123 wrote: >> >> I was getting a "java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: >> javax.jws.WebService.portName()Ljava/lang/String;" error on WebLogic 9.2 >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CXF-on-WebLogic-9.2-tp15193763p15210360.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: CXF on WebLogic 9.2

209) at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:181) chengas123 wrote: > > I was getting a "java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: > javax.jws.WebService.portName()Ljava/lang/String;" error on WebLogic 9.2 > -- View this message in context: http

CXF on WebLogic 9.2

to need another solution since I'm not sure this would fly in our production environment. Thanks, Ben -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CXF-on-WebLogic-9.2-tp15193763p15193763.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.