From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<< I bet a hundred million pounds (or dollars even!) that not one single
person will object to your comments on here. >>
You'd lose, I found such remarks offensive and I've objected to remarks like
them in the past. Check the archives.
You'll also find that I'm not
From: "IG", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<<>>
Is this your interpretation of events, or was this information actually
published?
If you let me know the case details, ie roughly the date and the name of any
one of the defendants, I will pull the court transcript to establish what
happened.
Incidentally, w
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IG writes:
<< I quoted these laws in order to show that higher crime figures are as the
result of more laws that can be transgressed and to show how society has
evolved over the past 80 odd years
:::Now the law abiding are penalised and criminal acts punish
From: "IG", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<>
What particular rights are they, Nick?
I take it that, in your ideal society, there would be total freedom to get
pissed, drive and kill the odd pedestrian?
I wager thee a kings ransom if you saw as much roadkill as I did, then your
mind would be changed!
Anyw
From: nick royall, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One thing that IG's list of laws omits is that:
Prior to 1930 it was NOT an offence to abuse onself by taking drugs
therfore there were no illegal drug dealers shooting each other over their
patch.
Prior to 1953 the law abiding could carry virtually any it
