From: David Chappell - UK, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The reference to Chinese 7,62 NATO is interesting, as
I remember a series of articles in Guns Review about
ammunition and the author had encountered some 80's
vintage Chinese made 7,62 (made for export :-) but
marked not only with STANAG marks, but
From: "Matt Greenall", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SNIP
Does anyone have any personal experience of the problem of
using 7.62 NATO in a .308?
SNIP
When using RG 7.62 in my Rem700 case extraction is extremely hard,
even to the point that the rim was pulled off by the extractor. Needless
to say that that
From: "E.J. Totty", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your comment:
[...]
I've always wondered why cases from different
makers have different case capacities, in fact Winchester
Match brass (rare stuff) has a higher case capacity than
their regular brass. Surely if they're all
From: "David M", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone have any personal experience of the problem of
using 7.62 NATO in a .308?
I bought some ex military "MEN" 7.62 ammo (German I believe) to use for
target/plinking in a Brazilian Mauser rebarreled to .308. After the first
couple of rounds and
From: "Alex Hamilton", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve,
I asked Martin Farnan about the warnings in the Bible about
7.62NATO/308Win and .223/5.56 and here is his reply.
Alex
- Original Message -
From: Martin G Farnan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Alex,
No, we merely draw firers attention to
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the NRA bible some years ago, there was, ISTR, a warning about using
commercial .308 ammo in military 7.62 rifles. And also a warning about
using military 5.56 ammo in commercial .223 rifles. Anyone got further
info on the .223/5.56 issue?
Steve
--
There still is
