I've created an index.html for the website -
http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps/
I've listed the current CVS hosted projects, in a very basic form. If
anyone wants to make it prettier patches will be appreciated :].
I'll be creating a libgetopt++ specific page sometime soon - It would be
Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 12:59 PM
Also, setup must do the following (even without new 'views'
and whatnot)
Setup should already do that, why not make a test setup.ini and see what
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:53:34PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 06:34:29PM -0700, Ian Burrell wrote:
Is the script for building setup.ini files from a directory hierarchy
available anywhere? I want to setup a test install directory with the
full hierarchy and
On 3/25, I uploaded new versions of autoconf-devel and automake-devel,
but I didn't mark them current because Corinna was on vacation.
Corinna, any objections to removing the 'test' designation from
autoconf-devel-2.53-1 and automake-1.6-1 ? (Be sure to read the
previously posted
Chris,
Btw, the new version of 'upset' does the right thing with things
like this.
If you have a directory called 'XFree86-fonts-100dpi' it will no longer
assume that 100dpi is part of the version string. It just uses
the directory
name as a prefix for the .tar.bz2 files.
That's good for
Charles Wilson wrote:
Actually, if there's no opposition (hah!) I'll update the documentation to
reflect the current situation (e.g. 3 styles) -- but I'd like to mark one of
them as the preferred style for new packages. Hopefully mine and robert's
style. ;-)
Okay, as promised:
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 3:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: strange source packaging?
Charles Wilson wrote:
Actually, if there's no opposition (hah!) I'll update the
documentation to
Can someone assure me that the source for extract.exe is included in the
cygwin-xfree source code before I pull it down? I have the archived binary
distribution of cygwin-xfree 4.1.0, but I didn't hold on to the extract.exe
when I archived these. Now, unfortunately, the extract.exe available
Finally getting back to this after a very busy week.
http://xfree86.cygwin.com/docs/ug/
The User's Guide tells you how to install Cygwin/XFree86, including the
startup batch files and shell scripts. I can guarantee that you will not be
successful in installing Cygwin/XFree86 until you
Perry,
Take a look at /tmp/XWin.log... my suspicion is that you goofed on
installing the fonts.
Harold
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Perry Hutchison
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 5:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL
Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 12:59 PM
Also, setup must do the following (even without new 'views'
and whatnot)
Setup should already do that, why not make a test setup.ini and see what
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:53:34PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 06:34:29PM -0700, Ian Burrell wrote:
Is the script for building setup.ini files from a directory hierarchy
available anywhere? I want to setup a test install directory with the
full hierarchy and
Take a look at /tmp/XWin.log... my suspicion is that you goofed on
installing the fonts.
No font complaints, but it evidently won't run with the standard VGA
display driver. /tmp/XWin.log says:
winInitializeDefaultScreens () - w 640 h 480
_XSERVTransmkdir: Owner of /tmp/.X11-unix should be
Chris,
Btw, the new version of 'upset' does the right thing with things
like this.
If you have a directory called 'XFree86-fonts-100dpi' it will no longer
assume that 100dpi is part of the version string. It just uses
the directory
name as a prefix for the .tar.bz2 files.
That's good for
Robert,
Hmm. What happens if you supply a (say) 16Kb subset
of the wininit.ini
file to windows ME - does it process it correctly?
Rob
Hi Rob,
Renaming is done - but now renamed file haved 8.3
names with ~ and are unusable, I think, by X,
since names are incorrect - too bad.
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 08:01:12PM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
Btw, the new version of 'upset' does the right thing with things like
this. If you have a directory called 'XFree86-fonts-100dpi' it will no
longer assume that 100dpi is part of the version string. It just uses
the directory name as a
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 12:59:26PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
What's your prognosis on this? Is this a problem that is
specific to Sylvain's machine or is this going to be a
problem because Cygwin/XFree86 has over 4000 files in the
font directories?
I haven't come to a root cause yet.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 1:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: xfree86 install makes wininit not working
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 12:59:26PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
What's your prognosis on
I don't know that the Windows 95 CD will be of help, but
I found Trident's page for the card:
http://www.tridentmicro.com/drivers/download/tgui9440.html
The Windows 95 driver is here:
http://www.tridentmicro.com/drivers/download/tgui_tvga/w95-9440.exe
Hope that helps. Let me know if
We've got a problem folks:
From MSDN
===
To rename or delete a file on Windows 95/98/Me
Check for the existence of the WININIT.INI file in the Windows
directory.
If WININIT.INI exists, open it and add new entries to the existing
[rename] section. If the file does not exist, create the file
Greetings,
I had posted earlier about some undefined references to InitCommonControls.
I seem to be having a problem trying to link with the comctl32 library, I
link to it but it still can't find it. I realize that this isn't directly
related to cygwin so I am asking if anyone has had any
I realize that at one time setup.exe might not have been all that it was
thought to be. And that now it may be better. But once burned many people
do not jump back in the flames. Well I decided I would stick my little toe
in again and see the results. I really thought there would be manual
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 02:51:45AM -0400, George Hester wrote:
Suggestion. Let's consider a Manual Install Direction for us weenies
that lost a few toes trying to install this software in the past.
You're making things way too hard for yourself. Just run setup.exe
and select Install rather
Could you give the CVS commands to get the source of the setup? I am
thinking this is the only way I can do what this post is asking. At least
that is my understanding. Thanks.
--
George Hester
_
Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
-Original Message-
From: George Hester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 4:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I am not going to let Cygwin BSOD my Windows 2000 Server
Consider this: A BSOD is equivalent to a unix kernel panic - usermode
software should
Do you have all your toes?
--
George Hester
_
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 02:51:45AM -0400, George Hester wrote:
Suggestion. Let's consider a Manual Install Direction
http://cygwin.com/cvs.html
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
In the cygwin-apps I have seen some messages
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-01/msg00340.html about a
killall
util, which was going to be part of the cygutils packages but was waiting
because of licensing problems.
For killall I'm using a good working script for about a
Eduado wrote:
I am running the bash shell, and somehow, even though the SHELL variable is
set, Oine does not pick it up.
Although bash sets the SHELL variable, it does not export it. This has been
discussed on this list before. The correct solution is to explicitly export
it yourself from
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 02:51:45 -0400 George Hester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realize that at one time setup.exe might not have been all that it was
thought to be. And that now it may be better. But once burned many
people
do not jump back in the flames. Well I decided I would stick my
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 03:19:40AM -0400, George Hester wrote:
Do you have all your toes?
Sure. My toes are not so sensitive that they become burned off if
I encounter a problem with my system.
I'm also the kind of guy who thinks that if something is working for 99%
of the people out there and
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Heribert Dahms wrote:
Hi Richard,
if it's that important for your company's project
(that you work like me 50% of each 25h day 8-)
why don't you pay Red Hat per hour or day,
so Corinna or Chris work for you in their prime time?
Hi Heribert,
Yes, that's a
IMHO, cygwin setup works like a champ. I've install cygwin on 4
machiness in the past year, nary a BSOD.
Stick your toes back in. The water was never that bad in the first
place.
;-)
David
On Sat, 2002-04-20 at 12:35, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 03:19:40AM -0400,
Hi All,
So, I'm trying to get started with implementing the honoring of the suid
bit by cygwin. I've downloaded the source and performed a build (which
failed - the tail of make.log is below). So, I jumped into the source
directory and looked at what was there. I started with the cygserver*
BTW, did it occur to anyone that the rapid and multiple responses to
this email -- which, given its tone and lack of specific content
qualifies as a troll by any objective measure -- serve to ENCOURAGE this
sort of insistent, badgering, and rude behavior?
I mean, geez -- it worked,
Sort of. Maybe it does work for 99% of the people out there. I know
nothing of that. And yes, my toes are sensitive to things such as this. If
I lose my op sys it takes me months to get it back to the condition I had
before its destruction. You may not believe me but I assure you that is the
Thanks Robert. I went there. But it looks as though I have to have Cygwin
installed to do this. Let me give you an example:
On this page:
http://www.iol.ie/~locka/mozilla/plugin.htm
you will see an example how to get files using CVS. That worked just fine
for me.
But on this page:
Michael A Chase wrote:
I'm having trouble understanding how setup.exe became the source of all
evil in the universe. You had one BSOD months ago which may or may not
have been caused by setup.exe and as a result you are unwilling to try
another version of it ever again.
A client level
At 01:51 PM 4/20/2002, George Hester wrote:
Sort of. Maybe it does work for 99% of the people out there. I know
nothing of that. And yes, my toes are sensitive to things such as this. If
I lose my op sys it takes me months to get it back to the condition I had
before its destruction. You may
At 02:02 PM 4/20/2002, George Hester wrote:
Thanks Robert. I went there. But it looks as though I have to have Cygwin
installed to do this. Let me give you an example:
On this page:
http://www.iol.ie/~locka/mozilla/plugin.htm
you will see an example how to get files using CVS. That worked
At 06:35 PM 4/19/2002, Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
Hi,
while looking for the new Xfree86 packages in my
local package directory (in my case D:\cyg-install),
I see that packages are saved in a curious directory
since March 22th.
Its name is :
At 04:23 AM 4/20/2002, Bryan Siever wrote:
Greetings,
I had posted earlier about some undefined references to InitCommonControls.
I seem to be having a problem trying to link with the comctl32 library, I
link to it but it still can't find it. I realize that this isn't directly
related to
At 01:42 PM 4/20/2002, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
BTW, did it occur to anyone that the rapid and multiple responses to
this email -- which, given its tone and lack of specific content
qualifies as a troll by any objective measure -- serve to ENCOURAGE this
sort of insistent,
George Hester wrote:
The information I have garnered here has helped to maybe stick my toes in
the fire again. I will wait a while and see if there is any good soul that
can explain the procedures for a manual setup. And if that is pie in the sky
then at that point I will decide if walking
The TechMail Anti-Virus Scanner found a potentially dangerous file
(bootstrap.bat) sent from Charles Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
The file was discovered attached to an email message addressed to you with a
subject of Re: I am not going to let cygwin BSOD my Windows 2000 Server.
The attachment
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s) or
blocked a file matching the blocking rules.
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject = Re: I am not going to let cygwin BSOD my Windows 2000 Server
Scanning Time = 04/20/2002
ROTFLMAO
George Hester was the one who wanted all this stuff -- and I just got
four (count 'em, FOUR) Message not delivered, virus/sensitive content
found bounce messages from HIS account. Apparently, George's email
account is paranoid about .README files .zip files, in addition to
The TechMail Anti-Virus Scanner found a potentially dangerous file
(bootstrap.bat) sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
The file was discovered attached to an email message addressed to you with a
subject of cygwin Digest 20 Apr 2002 21:36:41 - Issue 1886.
The attachment has
Charles Wilson wrote:
ROTFLMAO
George Hester was the one who wanted all this stuff -- and I just got
four (count 'em, FOUR) Message not delivered, virus/sensitive content
found bounce messages from HIS account. Apparently, George's email
account is paranoid about .README files
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 17:39:15 -0400 Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ROTFLMAO
George Hester was the one who wanted all this stuff -- and I just got
four (count 'em, FOUR) Message not delivered, virus/sensitive content
found bounce messages from HIS account. Apparently,
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 01:51:36PM -0400, George Hester wrote:
Sort of. Maybe it does work for 99% of the people out there. I know
nothing of that. And yes, my toes are sensitive to things such as this. If
I lose my op sys it takes me months to get it back to the condition I had
before its
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 08:40:52AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 4:14 AM
(*) has anybody ported GnuPG to cygwin? Would you mind supporting it
and adding it to the cygwin dist?
If
George,
What I see is that both pages instruct the user to do a cvs login and
that's to be expected, since that part of CVS.
You don't need to use the Cygwin port of CVS to retrieve file from the
cygwin.com CVS server. You can use a Windows native CVS command line or
something like WinCVS or
Christopher Faylor wrote on Saturday, April 20, 2002 11:38 PM:
... You might also want to invest in
something like Norton Systemworks which has diagnostic tools that may
help narrow down what's wrong with your system.
Hmm. Recently we had an NT system which was frequently BSOD'ing
(not
Hi,
Our names are Larry Dawn Froncek and I would like to
share a genuine, NO RISK opportunity with you.
Skeptical already? Good!
Unlike other internet opportunities that you might have seen,
what I have to share with you invites close scrutiny
even with a skeptical eye.It is first and
The source code I put here:
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/vcd-src/
to help you guys get compliant with the GPL is going away in 48 hours.
I can't keep that much stuff up there indefinitely...
--Chuck
Charles Wilson wrote:
cygwin-1.1.8
cygwin-1.3.6
zlib
Hi,
I'm tryong to compile cygwin for the first time and am getting the
following errors on my system. I was hoping someone could explain the
conflict here and why my system is failing when every other one in the
world works.
make[2]: Leaving directory
Theres a bug in the cinstall directory which I will be resolving
shortly. For now, you can ignore that directories failure.
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:
-Original Message-
From: Richard Troy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 3:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The Server Daemon
Hi All,
So, I'm trying to get started with implementing the honoring
of the suid bit by cygwin. I've downloaded the
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 03:46:38PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
Yes, I could write the individuals mentioned in the source, but Corinna
dictated that we should keep our dialogues here. In deference to her,
I'm posting here...
I appreciate this too.
And, see also: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
60 matches
Mail list logo
