[PATCH] Logging output of post-install scripts in setup

2002-10-17 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
I changed the subject line to something more appropriate and resent to the (hopefully) correct list. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-. ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCH] Logging output of post-install scripts in setup

2002-10-17 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 00:02, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: I changed the subject line to something more appropriate and resent to the (hopefully) correct list. Igor Ok, some feedback. Firstly, does this all work happily on win95? With both .bat and .sh scripts? Secondly, please don't pass

Re: xwinclip problem/puzzle

2002-10-17 Thread luke . kendall
On 15 Oct, Chris Twiner wrote: Thanks for the referal Jehan, And maybe Chris has a newer version now. Unfortunately not. The version most recently posted had the ctrl+c and server reset code in place but nothing much else. Oh. This I had planned to do: - get the windows

Re: Invoking rootless mode

2002-10-17 Thread Uwe Schmidtmann
Hi! The rootless mode is much more interesting than the real one from other products (at least for me). One of the reasons for this is cygwins capability of still being able to use an X11 window manager (e.g. icewm) instead of the dump windows user interface (oh how I miss the focus follows

Re: Invoking rootless mode

2002-10-17 Thread Sam Edge
You wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED] in gmane.os.cygwin.xfree on Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:13:10 +0200: oh how I miss the focus follows mouse function within windows, just to mention one At the expense of being somewhat off topic and sounding like a Microsoft UI aficionado you can get this behaviour out

Re: Invoking rootless mode

2002-10-17 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Bradey, Thanks for pointing that out. I added the -rootless command-line arg to the patch that Matsuzaki sent in, so Test66 and XFree86-xserv-4.2.0-13 are different than the release that Thomas Chadwick made. This version of a rootless mode is precisely what I was aiming for: something

Re: Rootless mode revisited...

2002-10-17 Thread Thomas Chadwick
FYI - I've taken down the binary I posted to avoid any confusion with Harold's test release of XWin -rootless. From: Thomas Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Rootless mode revisited... Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:52:56 -0400 By the way, my

[PATCH] fix segv in pthread_mutex::init

2002-10-17 Thread Thomas Pfaff
This patch should fix the segfault in pthread_mutex::init by changing the test order for a valid object and checking for valid initializer object first.. Thomas 2002-10-17 Thomas Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] * thread.cc (verifyable_object_isvalid): Test for static object first.

Re: [PATCH] fix segv in pthread_mutex::init

2002-10-17 Thread Thomas Pfaff
Stripped the patch a little. Changelog remains unchanged. Thomas 2002-10-17 Thomas Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] * thread.cc (verifyable_object_isvalid): Test for static object first. (pthread_mutex::init): Add test for valid initializer object. On Thu, 17 Oct 2002,

Re: [PATCH] fix segv in pthread_mutex::init

2002-10-17 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 18:11, Thomas Pfaff wrote: This patch should fix the segfault in pthread_mutex::init by changing the test order for a valid object and checking for valid initializer object first.. I'm happy with the verifyable_object change. I'm not happy with the pthread_mutex::init

Re: [PATCH] fix segv in pthread_mutex::init

2002-10-17 Thread Thomas Pfaff
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Robert Collins wrote: On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 18:11, Thomas Pfaff wrote: This patch should fix the segfault in pthread_mutex::init by changing the test order for a valid object and checking for valid initializer object first.. I'm happy with the verifyable_object

RE: starting a cygwin app from a Windows Service

2002-10-17 Thread Dan Vasaru
I think you're missing my point, Chris. I am trying to convince software authors to make their Unix software compatible with text files creates in the DOS world, at least until libc on all Unixes of the world implement text translation (which they currently don't). This is not a CYGWIN issue,

new gdb interface

2002-10-17 Thread Thomas Mellman
I'm not sure if this is a cygwin issue, but... I just ran gdb for the first time on CYGWIN to debug a little program I'm writing All of a sudden up pops a graphics window. Now, I've used gdb for many years, enjoy it, and can operate it. I can't operate this graphical interface and don't want

RE: new gdb interface

2002-10-17 Thread Al Slater
try gdb --help Al -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Mellman Sent: 17 October 2002 08:02 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: new gdb interface I'm not sure if this is a cygwin issue, but... I just ran gdb for the first

Re: Setup and recovering from mistakes.

2002-10-17 Thread Max Bowsher
Last week I downloaded and used setup for the minimal cygwin system. I used the 'download from internet' and 'install from download' options ... There is no such option 'install from download'. Do you mean 'install from internet' or 'install from local directory'? Max. -- Unsubscribe

Re: new gdb interface

2002-10-17 Thread egor duda
Hi! Thursday, 17 October, 2002 Thomas Mellman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TM I had to power down my box - neither kill(-9) on either the process under test, TM the debugger or the debugger window, nor even the task manager were able TM to kill the two processes, and even windows-shutdown hung.

Re: new gdb interface

2002-10-17 Thread CBFalconer
Thomas Mellman wrote: Thank you, that helped. Nevertheless, let me re-iterate my plea: particularly in the CYGWIN world, fancy do-dads should be optional, rather than standard Unix command line behaviour (IMHO) being optional. Amen. -- Chuck F ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: Setup and recovering from mistakes.

2002-10-17 Thread CBFalconer
Max Bowsher wrote: Last week I downloaded and used setup for the minimal cygwin system. I used the 'download from internet' and 'install from download' options ... There is no such option 'install from download'. Do you mean 'install from internet' or 'install from local directory'?

Re: Re: new gdb interface

2002-10-17 Thread Thomas Mellman
egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 17.10.02 10:10:39: Hi! Thursday, 17 October, 2002 Thomas Mellman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TM I had to power down my box - neither kill(-9) on either the process under test, TM the debugger or the debugger window, nor even the task manager were able

Re: new gdb interface

2002-10-17 Thread Roland Schwingel
Hi... Cygwin uses insight, the gnu gdb frontend (which when you got used to it, can help a lot) and which is included in newer gdb versions.It is *NOT* a cygwin extenstion. To start in traditional mode run gdb with the -nw option. Roland Thomas Mellman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL

RE: help about TERM type in new cygwin version

2002-10-17 Thread Kris Thielemans
Shizhu Pan wrote: I have upgrade my cygwin 1.3.2 to 1.3.12, and when I start Vim 6.1 it said that the TERM 'cygwin' not supported, only four 'builtin-xxx' term type is supported. I assume you mean 1.3.13-2 (the current version). Vim gives me no such message here and works fine with

BUG in CYGWIN's implementation of GDB?

2002-10-17 Thread Thomas Mellman
I think I've encountered a bug in GDB. Although help run says the following: (gdb) help run Start debugged program. You may specify arguments to give it. Args may include *, or [...]; they are expanded using sh. Input and output redirection with , , or are also allowed. if you say:

Another problem using GDB

2002-10-17 Thread Thomas Mellman
I'm having another problem with GDB. Normally, one would debug a core file as follows (correct?): gdb -nw gtl.exe gtl.exe.stackdump Unfortunately, I get the following in response: GNU gdb 5.0 (20010428-3) Copyright 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by

Re: Setup and recovering from mistakes.

2002-10-17 Thread CBFalconer
Max Bowsher wrote: CBFalconer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Max Bowsher wrote: There is no such option 'install from download'. Do you mean 'install from internet' or 'install from local directory'? From local. IIRC running setup only gives the three options, including 'download'.

rsh with different user

2002-10-17 Thread LE GALLO Pierre OF/DSI/EXT
Hello, I want to rsh to servers where the .rhosts just has the + central line. On NT, I am plegallo user. Ok, I know I can not login from the command line to central (I saw thread from Bjoern Kahl AG Resy) ... But how can I do rsh -l central host? Thanks. -- Unsubscribe info:

RE: starting a CYGWIN app from a Windows Service

2002-10-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You'll probably want to check out the user's guide on this. mounts only come into play if you don't specify a mode to read and write in explicitly. user mounts apply to a particular user. system mounts apply to any user. The mode specified by a mount will only be consulted if the mode of the

Re: errno issue with cross gcc using newlib

2002-10-17 Thread Earnie Boyd
Wrong list, redirected. Please remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the distribution in responses. Earnie. Anurag Sharma wrote: Hi All, I have come across a strange behaviour using gcc cross compiler (host: linux, target: cygwin). I am using the cygwin header files and lib files while making

Re: Python support for Tcl 8.0

2002-10-17 Thread Jason Tishler
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:45:40PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:15:31PM -0400, Robinow, David wrote: The following post from the Python-Dev mailing list seems to have ramifications for Cygwin Python. Comments, anyone? Thanks for the heads up. I will post the

Re: Another problem using GDB

2002-10-17 Thread Pavel Holejsovsky
Cygwin normally does not produce core dumps, but only simple textual stack backtraces (try to look at gtl.exe.stackdump using your text editor). However, you can have full core dumps using dumper utility; see http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-utils.html#DUMPER for details. Pavel [EMAIL

Re: new gdb interface

2002-10-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As mentioned, the behavior of gdb is driven by the developers of gdb and insight. You should address your questions and concerns in this area to the gdb list. Larry Original Message: - From: Thomas Mellman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:31:03 +0200 To: [EMAIL

m4: add an option to specify an output file for stdout

2002-10-17 Thread Ralf Hauser
Otherwise, if only pipe redirection () is possible, the interaction for example with jakarta ant becomes very complicated. see http://www.seindal.dk/forum/read.php?f=2i=76t=76 and and http://www.mail-archive.com/ant-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg21085.html -- Unsubscribe info:

Strange packaging of gawk-3.1.1-4 results in Illegal instructionswhen called from cmd.exe

2002-10-17 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Hi The latest gawk-3.1.1-4 packaging is kind of strange: drwxrwxrwx cgf/group 0 2002-10-07 22:08:31 usr/ drwxrwxrwx cgf/group 0 2002-10-07 22:08:31 usr/bin/ lrwxrwxrwx cgf/group 0 2002-10-07 22:08:31 usr/bin/awk - gawk -rwxrwxrwx cgf/group240640 2002-10-07 22:08:31