RE: mhash-0.9.1-1

2004-10-06 Thread Jörg Schaible
Just to complete the list: http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/doc.html Gerrit P. Haase wrote on Wednesday, October 06, 2004 1:53 AM: Hello Lapo, Well I guess I will at least try harder porting djbdns, then, I really miss a local DNS resolver on my laptop 0=) 1. caching DNS server

Re: DJB licensing issues

2004-10-06 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hello Brian, (As for a local resolver, I use the win32 BIND9.) Works well? I don't like BIND very much, but I could use it as a fall-back in case I can't get dnscache to work... It works well, even has a nifty installer that installs it as a service. The command line binaries (host, dig,

Re: libgeotiff-1.2.1-2

2004-10-06 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Charles, +1 vote from me for libgeotiff (makes 3 IIRC, please upload). +1 vote for proj. Would you ming to included also GEOS in this set of packages? If so, +1 vote for geos. Where did THIS come from? I ITP'ed these over a year ago; surely there's a statute of limitations

GNOME - startup scripts needed

2004-10-06 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hello, Just read at the gnome website about the cross-desktop MIME-type system. As with GNOME 2.6, you must define the XDG_DATA_DIRS environment variable to the path at which your MIME database is installed, for instance prefix/share. Now I thought that things like this need to be handled, and

Openssh on Windows XP SP2 sshd service stops when attempting to connect.

2004-10-06 Thread koan
Hello, I have read what I can find, but am getting stuck with sshd. I am using Openssh 3.9p1-2. My service starts fine, and I am running it with -d -d -d -e parameters (set in registry), I used -v -v -v on the ssh command line. My key files are owned by SYSTEM:none, and are read-write for

Re: GNOME - startup scripts needed

2004-10-06 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Hello, Just read at the gnome website about the cross-desktop MIME-type system. As with GNOME 2.6, you must define the XDG_DATA_DIRS environment variable to the path at which your MIME database is installed, for instance prefix/share. Now I thought that things like this need

Re: DJB licensing issues [Was: [ITP] mhash-0.9.1-1]

2004-10-06 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian Dessent wrote: Still, I doubt it qualifies as OSI-approved by any stretch of the imagination. It doesn't even have a copyright notice in the source nor in the package, maybe it qualifies as Public Domani, but I guess an email to DJB could

Re: Please upload: postgresql-8.0.0cvs-1 [test] (gold star alert)

2004-10-06 Thread Jason Tishler
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 12:15:47PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: Igor, can we get two gold stars for Jason? One for his years of Postgres support, and another one for just being a long time contributor to Cygwin. [snip] Done. Thanks!

Re: DJB licensing issues [Was: [ITP] mhash-0.9.1-1]

2004-10-06 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 6 11:20, Lapo Luchini wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian Dessent wrote: Still, I doubt it qualifies as OSI-approved by any stretch of the imagination. It doesn't even have a copyright notice in the source nor in the package, maybe it qualifies as Public

Re: Openssh on Windows XP SP2 sshd service stops when attempting to connect.

2004-10-06 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 6 18:37, koan wrote: Hello, I have read what I can find, but am getting stuck with sshd. I am using Wrong mailing list. Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:[EMAIL

setup for all users

2004-10-06 Thread bertrand marquis
Hello, I'm running cygwin setup in quiet mode and i want to do it with all users options. i thought it was set by default as it is when you run the setup in standard mode but when i install cygwin as regular user under windows xp or 2000 the mount entry in the registry are set into

Resolvers (Re: mhash-0.9.1-1)

2004-10-06 Thread Reini Urban
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: Already ported: BIND. Why don't you use bind? http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/DNS/bind-9.2.2/ Because most of us don't like bind that much, I assume. There is the Lightweiht Resolver Daemon lwresd included with the bind-9 sources. 2. authoritative-only DNS server Powerdns:

Re: Resolvers (Re: mhash-0.9.1-1)

2004-10-06 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 6 12:48, Reini Urban wrote: Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: Already ported: BIND. Why don't you use bind? http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/DNS/bind-9.2.2/ Because most of us don't like bind that much, I assume. I guess using bind is some sort of a habit. The same goes for sendmail. You think

RFC: dodgy chere (aka cygwin prompt here) feature

2004-10-06 Thread Dave
Am in the process of adding functionality. I have a shiny new feature working locally: Context Menu item checks /etc/passwd for the preferred shell of the current user, and starts that as a login shell using the specified term. At the moment it has some quite horrible quoting going on, and I'm

Re: setup for all users

2004-10-06 Thread Jens Wilken
bertrand marquis wrote: Hello, I'm running cygwin setup in quiet mode and i want to do it with all users options. i thought it was set by default as it is when you run the setup in standard mode but when i install cygwin as regular user under windows xp or 2000 the mount entry in the registry

Re: GNOME - startup scripts needed

2004-10-06 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hello Yaakov, As with GNOME 2.6, you must define the XDG_DATA_DIRS environment variable to the path at which your MIME database is installed, for instance prefix/share. Now I thought that things like this need to be handled, and probably the best would be to do such initial settings in the

Re: Resolvers (Re: mhash-0.9.1-1)

2004-10-06 Thread Pierre A. Humblet
At 12:55 PM 10/6/2004 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Oct 6 12:48, Reini Urban wrote: Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: Already ported: BIND. Why don't you use bind? http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/DNS/bind-9.2.2/ Because most of us don't like bind that much, I assume. I guess using bind is some sort

Re: RFC: dodgy chere (aka cygwin prompt here) feature

2004-10-06 Thread Reini Urban
Dave schrieb: Comments appreciated. yes, this is perfect for handling -s optionally in chere: default shell from /etc/passwd chere [options...] [-s shell] -t terminal -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/

RE: dodgy chere (aka cygwin prompt here) feature

2004-10-06 Thread Hannu E K Nevalainen
Dave wrote on Wednesday, October 06, 2004 1:29 PM : Am in the process of adding functionality. I have a shiny new feature working locally: Context Menu item checks /etc/passwd for the preferred shell of the current user, and starts that as a login shell using the specified term. At the

update - ccdoc 08.41 is ready for experimentation

2004-10-06 Thread Joe Linoff
ccdoc 08.41 is ready for experimentation The distribution can be uploaded from: http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-08.41-1-src.tar.bz2 http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-08.41-1.tar.bz2 http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/setup.hint Thanks.

Re: update - ccdoc 08.41 is ready for experimentation

2004-10-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:40:32PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote: ccdoc 08.41 is ready for experimentation The distribution can be uploaded from: http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-08.41-1-src.tar.bz2 http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-08.41-1.tar.bz2

update: tetex 2.0.2-15

2004-10-06 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
A number of problems with 2.0.2-14 have been fixed, and I've also upgraded X and linked against the new X libraries. I'd like to remove 2.0.2-14 and have this new release replace it. Any ideas how to handle the setup hints? The new tetex-x11 hint file requires: x11-org-base (instead of

[ITP] sqlite-3.0.7

2004-10-06 Thread Jari Aalto+list.cygwin-apps
New port for review. sdesc: C library that implements an embeddable SQL database engine. ldesc: C library that implements an embeddable SQL database engine. Programs that link with the SQLite library can have SQL database access without running a separate RDBMS process. The distribution comes

Re: update: tetex 2.0.2-15

2004-10-06 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Any ideas how to handle the setup hints? The new tetex-x11 hint file requires: x11-org-base (instead of XFree86-base), but that would be a problem for 2.0.2-13. Well, you could require both (the new XFree86-base is a dummy package, which won't do

Re: [ITP] sqlite-3.0.7

2004-10-06 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Jari Aalto+list.cygwin-apps wrote: New port for review. sdesc: C library that implements an embeddable SQL database engine. ldesc: C library that implements an embeddable SQL database engine. Programs that link with the SQLite library can have SQL database access without

Re: update: tetex 2.0.2-15

2004-10-06 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Igor Pechtchanski writes: Well, you could require both (the new XFree86-base is a dummy package, Ok, that sounds like an acceptable option. I've fixed the xorg name and added XFree86-base. P.S. Does it really require xorg-x11-base, or xorg-x11-bin-dlls? I just mimicked ghostscript-x11.

Re: update - ccdoc 08.41 is ready for experimentation

2004-10-06 Thread Joe Linoff
I am afraid that I am not sure what you mean by beta-test but I don't think that the program needs to be tested at all. This version of ccdoc has been released to sourceforge and is already in the public domain. The reason I submitted it to this group for approval was because I was bit

Re: update - ccdoc 08.41 is ready for experimentation

2004-10-06 Thread Joe Linoff
I am afraid that I am not sure what you mean by beta-test but I don't think that the program needs to be tested at all. This version of ccdoc has been released to sourceforge and is already in the public domain. The reason I submitted it to this group for approval was because I was bit

Re: [ITP] sqlite-3.0.7

2004-10-06 Thread Reini Urban
Jari Aalto+list.cygwin-apps schrieb: New port for review. Ah, Jaari is back in business! Great. And a complete new building engine... and the same libtool problems as most of us... +1 for sqlite ./sqlite-3.0.7-1.sh conf builds into sqlite-3.0.7/.build/.build which seems to be odd. really

Re: [ITP] sqlite-3.0.7

2004-10-06 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Reini Urban wrote: Jari Aalto+list.cygwin-apps schrieb: New port for review. Ah, Jaari is back in business! Great. And a complete new building engine... and the same libtool problems as most of us... +1 for sqlite +1 vote from me too. ./sqlite-3.0.7-1.sh conf builds into

Re: [ITP] sqlite-3.0.7

2004-10-06 Thread Reini Urban
Reini Urban schrieb: Jari Aalto+list.cygwin-apps schrieb: Ah, Jaari is back in business! Great. And a complete new building engine... and the same libtool problems as most of us... +1 for sqlite ./sqlite-3.0.7-1.sh conf builds into sqlite-3.0.7/.build/.build which seems to be odd. really

Re: update - ccdoc 08.41 is ready for experimentation

2004-10-06 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Joe Linoff wrote: I am afraid that I am not sure what you mean by beta-test but I don't think that the program needs to be tested at all. This version of ccdoc has been released to sourceforge and is already in the public domain. The reason I submitted it to this group for approval was because

Re: [ITP] mhash-0.9.1-1

2004-10-06 Thread Reini Urban
Christopher Faylor schrieb: On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 08:44:40PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: I want to take over and maintain the cygwin version of mhash-0.9.1 It was probably just an oversight, because their DLL building instructions are from the CYGWIN FAQ, just wrongly applied. Builds out of the

Re: update - ccdoc 08.41 is ready for experimentation

2004-10-06 Thread Joe Linoff
Should I re-submit this with the ITP designation? Reini Urban wrote: Joe Linoff schrieb: I am afraid that I am not sure what you mean by beta-test but I don't think that the program needs to be tested at all. This version of ccdoc has been released to sourceforge and is already in the public

RE: libgeotiff-1.2.1-2

2004-10-06 Thread Norman Vine
Gerrit P. Haase writes: Hallo Charles, +1 vote from me for libgeotiff (makes 3 IIRC, please upload). +1 vote for proj. Would you ming to included also GEOS in this set of packages? If so, +1 vote for geos. Where did THIS come from? I ITP'ed these over a year ago;

Re: [ITP] mhash-0.9.1-1

2004-10-06 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Reini Urban wrote: Ah, and if you upload it please remove mhash-devel, since mhash-0.9.1-1 includes the devel stuff also. I already wrote it, but double is better. Or leave it as [prev]. As you want. (I don't think so) No, removed it and changed the setup.hint you included to reflect that the

Re: update - ccdoc 08.41 is ready for experimentation

2004-10-06 Thread Reini Urban
Joe Linoff schrieb: Should I re-submit this with the ITP designation? If you get 3 positive reviews IMHO not.

Re: update - ccdoc 08.41 is ready for experimentation

2004-10-06 Thread Joe Linoff
Reini Urban wrote: Reini Urban schrieb: You need a subject like: [ITP] ccdoc 08.41 Why this funny version number? It should be called ccdoc-0.8.41 imho. Or if MAJOR is 8 leave the 0 away = ccdoc-8.41 This is irritating. Thanks for the insight. I would strongly prefer ccdoc-0.8.41 but the cygwin

Re: update - ccdoc 08.41 is ready for experimentation

2004-10-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:06:21PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote: I am afraid that I am not sure what you mean by beta-test but I don't think that the program needs to be tested at all. Any reason for sending this multiple times? What everyone seems to be missing is this:

Re: [ITP] mhash-0.9.1-1

2004-10-06 Thread Reini Urban
Christopher Faylor schrieb: On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 03:01:16AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Reini Urban wrote: Ah, and if you upload it please remove mhash-devel, since mhash-0.9.1-1 includes the devel stuff also. I already wrote it, but double is better. Or leave it as [prev]. As you want. (I

Re: update - ccdoc 08.41 is ready for experimentation

2004-10-06 Thread Reini Urban
Christopher Faylor schrieb: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00270.html I'm thoroughly confused. You are the package maintainer but you, and everyone else are treating this like a new experience. Just me. Sorry, my fault. I thought I know all the packages by hard. -- Reini

Re: update - ccdoc 08.41 is ready for experimentation

2004-10-06 Thread Joe Linoff
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:06:21PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote: I am afraid that I am not sure what you mean by beta-test but I don't think that the program needs to be tested at all. Any reason for sending this multiple times? What everyone seems to be missing is

[PACKAGE UPDATE] ccdoc-0-8.41-2

2004-10-06 Thread Joe Linoff
Hi: Please upload the following to replace ccdoc-0.8.39-1: http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-0.8.41-2.tar.bz2 http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-0.8.41-2-src.tar.bz2 http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/setup.hint There are no cygwin related changes. Thanks, Joe

Re: update - ccdoc 08.41 is ready for experimentation

2004-10-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:33:50PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:06:21PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote: I am afraid that I am not sure what you mean by beta-test but I don't think that the program needs to be tested at all. Any reason for

Re: update: tetex 2.0.2-15

2004-10-06 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Igor Pechtchanski writes: Well, you could require both (the new XFree86-base is a dummy package, Ok, that sounds like an acceptable option. I've fixed the xorg name and added XFree86-base. P.S. Does it really require xorg-x11-base, or

Re: update: tetex 2.0.2-15

2004-10-06 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Igor Pechtchanski writes: Well, you could require both (the new XFree86-base is a dummy package, Ok, that sounds like an acceptable option. I've fixed the xorg name and added XFree86-base.

Re: update - ccdoc 08.41 is ready for experimentation

2004-10-06 Thread Joe Linoff
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:33:50PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:06:21PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote: I am afraid that I am not sure what you mean by beta-test but I don't think that the program needs to be

Re: [ITP] mhash-0.9.1-1

2004-10-06 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Reini Urban wrote: Christopher Faylor schrieb: On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 08:44:40PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: I want to take over and maintain the cygwin version of mhash-0.9.1 It was probably just an oversight, because their DLL building instructions are from the

Re: [ITP] mhash-0.9.1-1

2004-10-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:04:48PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Reini Urban wrote: Christopher Faylor schrieb: On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 08:44:40PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: I want to take over and maintain the cygwin version of mhash-0.9.1 It was probably just an

Re: update - ccdoc 08.41 is ready for experimentation

2004-10-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:51:33PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote: You are correct. I will be more vigilant in the future. Thanks for pointing this out. NP. Thanks for volunteering to maintain a package and put up with this grief. cgf

Re: Solaris X app crashes with Cygwin/X

2004-10-06 Thread Alexander Gottwald
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Maarten Boekhold wrote: Alexander, if this is because of missing fonts, why does it work when I run it from a CDE session started with XWin :1 -query remotehost? Doesn't is still use the fonts that are local to the X-Server? Solaris uses some magic in the xsession

Re: Items under Cygwin-X menu do not start.

2004-10-06 Thread Alexander Gottwald
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Alexander Gottwald wrote: On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Nick Longo wrote: Dear Cygwin Enthusiasts, Forgive me if I ask a newbie question, but I couldn't find an answer on the web, faq, or mailing list. So despite the dire warnings on the web page I just wanted to

RE: spelling correction

2004-10-06 Thread Phil Betts
Alexander Gottwald wrote: On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Thomas Munro wrote: Hi, On this page: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/cygwin-x-faq.html there is a heading: 11.4. Whom holds the copyright on the Cygwin/X source code? It should of course be Who. Sorry to send such trivial feedback to

Re: Solaris X app crashes with Cygwin/X

2004-10-06 Thread Maarten Boekhold
Alexander Gottwald wrote: check the fontpath with xset q|grep -A 1 Font Path: most likely you'll see something like tcp/solarishost:7100 in the line Right, that's it. I managed to start this app with -fn '-*-*-*-*-*-*-12-*-*-*-*-*-*-*, and it opens the main window. But when I open one of the sub

StartX and McAfee Firewall!

2004-10-06 Thread Andy
We run McAfee personal firewall on our laptops for security outside of the office. When startx is launched, the firesrvc pegs at near 90 and will stay there as long as it is used. The only way to bring it down is by disabling the service, which we prefer not to do. Any one have any ideas on

Re: Solaris X app crashes with Cygwin/X

2004-10-06 Thread Alexander Gottwald
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Maarten Boekhold wrote: Alexander Gottwald wrote: check the fontpath with xset q|grep -A 1 Font Path: most likely you'll see something like tcp/solarishost:7100 in the line Right, that's it. I managed to start this app with -fn

Re: spelling correction

2004-10-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:45:00PM +0100, Phil Betts wrote: Alexander Gottwald wrote: On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Thomas Munro wrote: Hi, On this page: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/cygwin-x-faq.html there is a heading: 11.4. Whom holds the copyright on the Cygwin/X source code? It should

Re: Solaris X app crashes with Cygwin/X

2004-10-06 Thread Maarten Boekhold
Alexander Gottwald wrote: The error message is not of much use. I figured.. I just wish it printed the real font name. Is there a way I can capture the xevent that tries to load the font? But you can always add the fontpath yourself: Yeah, but I'm running on a laptop, and I'm not always on the

Re: cygwin/x symantec antivirus conflict

2004-10-06 Thread Dick Repasky
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Jack Tanner wrote: Dick, what versions of Symantec Antivirus and scan enginge are you running? Do you get the delay if you're typing into a local shell? Do you get the delay if you're typing into a remote ssh-connected shell, but running under a local rxvt binary instead of

Re: Solaris X app crashes with Cygwin/X

2004-10-06 Thread Alexander Gottwald
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Maarten Boekhold wrote: Alexander Gottwald wrote: The error message is not of much use. I figured.. I just wish it printed the real font name. Is there a way I can capture the xevent that tries to load the font I know there is an protocol tracer for X11 but can't

Re: StartX and McAfee Firewall!

2004-10-06 Thread Andy
I am trying to find a way to disable scanning of the X11 connections The systems are secure locally, patched, and spy ware scanned weekly. This is a gov't security mandate that all laptops removed from the building have the PF running. -Andy Alexander Gottwald wrote: On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Andy

Re: Solaris X app crashes with Cygwin/X

2004-10-06 Thread Jack Tanner
Alexander Gottwald wrote: I figured.. I just wish it printed the real font name. Is there a way I can capture the xevent that tries to load the font I know there is an protocol tracer for X11 but can't find it on the web right now. Ethereal can read X11 packets, IIRC.

Re: cygwin/x symantec antivirus conflict

2004-10-06 Thread Jack Tanner
Dick Repasky wrote: I'm running Symantec 9.0.0.1400 with scan engine 1.2.0.13. Same as me. The two people that said they weren't having problems were running version 8.1.1.323 (Daniel) or 10.0.1.13 (Giampaolo). I think it's time to try an upgrade or a downgrade. I haven't tried it with rxvt

Re: cygwin/x symantec antivirus conflict

2004-10-06 Thread Philip Gladstone
Alexander Gottwald wrote: Jack Tanner wrote: A while back I mentioned I was experiencing slowdowns under X. http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2004-09/msg00010.html I think the slowdowns may have to do with Symantec Antivirus. The slowness that I see with Symantec Antivirus is due

Re: cygwin/x symantec antivirus conflict

2004-10-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:36:22PM -0400, Philip Gladstone wrote: Alexander Gottwald wrote: Jack Tanner wrote: A while back I mentioned I was experiencing slowdowns under X. http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2004-09/msg00010.html I think the slowdowns may have to do with Symantec

src/winsup/utils ChangeLog cygcheck.cc

2004-10-06 Thread corinna
CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 09:46:40 Modified files: winsup/utils : ChangeLog cygcheck.cc Log message: * cygcheck.cc (dump_sysinfo): Warn about empty path-components. Patches:

src/winsup/utils ChangeLog strace.cc

2004-10-06 Thread corinna
CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 09:51:11 Modified files: winsup/utils : ChangeLog strace.cc Log message: * strace.cc (_impure_ptr): Remove. Patches:

src/winsup/mingw ChangeLog include/math.h ming ...

2004-10-06 Thread dannysmith
CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 20:31:32 Modified files: winsup/mingw : ChangeLog winsup/mingw/include: math.h winsup/mingw/mingwex: Makefile.in Added files: winsup/mingw/mingwex/math: acosh.c

Re: [Patch] cygcheck: warn about empty path-components

2004-10-06 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 6 10:49, Bas van Gompel wrote: Op Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:46:49 +0200 schreef Corinna Vinschen in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [Empty path-components resolving to current dir.] : Oh, interesting. I never even thought about using an empty path. Nor I. Thw described behaviour makes the warning

Re: [Patch] cygcheck: warn about trailing (back)slash on mount entries

2004-10-06 Thread Pierre A. Humblet
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 03:12:45PM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote: Another (hopefully trivial) patch, to help in trouble-shooting. Wasn't there another problem where foo\/bar type of entries were showing up? Could you add a check for that, too? I while ago I have

Re: [Patch] cygcheck: warn about trailing (back)slash on mount entries

2004-10-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:30:17AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 03:12:45PM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote: Another (hopefully trivial) patch, to help in trouble-shooting. Wasn't there another problem where foo\/bar type of entries were

Re: [Patch] cygcheck: warn about trailing (back)slash on mount entries

2004-10-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 12:00:15PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:30:17AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 03:12:45PM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote: Another (hopefully trivial) patch,

Re: [Patch] cygcheck: warn about trailing (back)slash on mount entries

2004-10-06 Thread Bas van Gompel
Op Wed, 06 Oct 2004 12:00:15 -0400 schreef Pierre A. Humblet in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: : : : Christopher Faylor wrote: : : On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:30:17AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: : : Christopher Faylor wrote: : : On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 03:12:45PM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote: :

Re: [Patch] cygcheck: warn about empty path-components

2004-10-06 Thread Bas van Gompel
Op Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:49:39 +0200 schreef Corinna Vinschen in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: : On Oct 6 10:49, Bas van Gompel wrote: : Op Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:46:49 +0200 schreef Corinna Vinschen : in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: : : [Empty path-components resolving to current dir.] [...] : Are you applying the

Re: [Patch] cygcheck: warn about empty path-components

2004-10-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 04:05:14AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote: Op Wed, 6 Oct 2004 10:58:05 -0400 schreef Christopher Faylor in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: : On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:49:09AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote: [Empty path-components resolving to current dir.] : (Maybe the message could get

Problem with man

2004-10-06 Thread Alex Vinokur
Hi, I have a problem with man. $ man ps Unrecognized line in config file (ignored) JNROFF LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 /usr/bin/groff -Tnippon -mandocj Unrecognized line in config file (ignored) KNROFF /usr/bin/groff -Tkorean -mandoc Unrecognized line in config file (ignored) JNEQN

Re: Problem with man

2004-10-06 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Alex Vinokur writes: Hi, I have a problem with man. $ man ps Unrecognized line in config file (ignored) JNROFF LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 /usr/bin/groff -Tnippon -mandocj Unrecognized line in config file (ignored) KNROFF /usr/bin/groff -Tkorean -mandoc

Re: Problem with man

2004-10-06 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Alex Vinokur wrote: Hi, I have a problem with man. $ man ps Unrecognized line in config file (ignored) JNROFF LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 /usr/bin/groff -Tnippon -mandocj Unrecognized line in config file (ignored) KNROFF /usr/bin/groff -Tkorean -mandoc Unrecognized line in

RE: SSH + CVS But no login.

2004-10-06 Thread Michael Jervis
Do you Google: http://google.com/search?q=cvsonly+site%3Acygwin.com? Ah, yeah. Um. I have a nasty head cold and was in a rush. No idea why I didn't google but that works just lovely thank you. Next question: I've just deleted the various Guest/System accounts from my passwd file. This wont'

RE: setsockopt SO_REUSEADDR

2004-10-06 Thread Rainer Hochreiter
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 09:54:39 -0500, Brian Ford wrote: BTW to the OP, why are you printing the address of the socket function out? I think you meant to print s instead of socket? oops - you are right! i wanted to print the socket and not the address of the socket() function! ;-) rainer --

Re: g++ 3.4.x library issue

2004-10-06 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Steven, Am Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2004 um 02:23 schriebst du: Greetings! I tried downloading g++ version 3.4.1 (which I've been eagerly awaiting) from setup.exe. It had trouble with the following (minimal) program because the string header could not find cstddef where it expected to

How to make setup not look for external mirrors

2004-10-06 Thread Carlo Florendo
Hello great cygwin people! I have mirrored cygwin and made the installation accessible via http on our local web server. There are some boxes that may access only LAN resources and I want those boxes to have cygwin. When I start running setup on those boxes, I select download from internet

Re: How to make setup not look for external mirrors

2004-10-06 Thread bertrand marquis
Hello, there is an option to the setup in command line specifying the mirror site, perhaps could you try that. see http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00526.html for more info. bertrand Le mer 06/10/2004 09:50, Carlo Florendo a crit : Hello great cygwin people! I

RE: Mailing list redirection etiquette?

2004-10-06 Thread Dave Korn
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Brian Ford Sent: 05 October 2004 23:46 On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 04:37:35PM -0500, Fred Kulack wrote: Getting way off topic here, ...which makes it a better topic for the cygwin-talk mailing list... So what

RE: How to make setup not look for external mirrors

2004-10-06 Thread Dave Korn
-Original Message- From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Carlo Florendo Sent: 06 October 2004 08:51 Hello great cygwin people! I have mirrored cygwin and made the installation accessible via http on our local web server. There are some boxes that may access only LAN resources and

Re: [PATCH] cygrunsrv --recovery action

2004-10-06 Thread Rainer Hochreiter
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:15:45 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Sep 30 12:06, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote: And when you resubmit, please use diff -u instead of diff -c -- the patch is much more readable that way. ACK. well, are there any guidelines

Re: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole Cygwin release/ distribution

2004-10-06 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 5 22:19, Karl M wrote: Hi All... What about calling it B21? : *cough* Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info:

[SOLVED] Re: How to make setup not look for external mirrors

2004-10-06 Thread Carlo Florendo
Hello Dave and Bertrand, Great advice! Worked well. Thank you very much! Best Regards, Carlo Dave Korn wrote: -Original Message- From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Carlo Florendo Sent: 06 October 2004 08:51 Hello great cygwin people! I have mirrored cygwin and made the installation

Re: SSH + CVS But no login.

2004-10-06 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 6 07:52, Michael Jervis wrote: Do you Google: http://google.com/search?q=cvsonly+site%3Acygwin.com? Ah, yeah. Um. I have a nasty head cold and was in a rush. No idea why I didn't google but that works just lovely thank you. Next question: I've just deleted the various

Re: DLL rebase required?

2004-10-06 Thread Jason Tishler
Maarten, Please post instead of sending private email. On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 01:10:53PM +0400, Maarten Boekhold wrote: I wanted to run this by you before I hose my system with a potentially unnecessary rebaseall... I'm porting XFCE to cygwin/X, most of it is running perfectly now. One of

Re: [PATCH] cygrunsrv --recovery action

2004-10-06 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 6 11:57, Rainer Hochreiter wrote: well, are there any guidelines how to submit patches and describing ChangeLog syntax available? http://cygwin.com/contrib.html, section When you have finalized your changes Just ignore the hint to send patches to the cygwin-patches list. right! but

RE: [PATCH] cygrunsrv --recovery action

2004-10-06 Thread Dave Korn
-Original Message- From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Rainer Hochreiter Sent: 06 October 2004 10:57 well, are there any guidelines how to submit patches and describing ChangeLog syntax available? Check out http://cygwin.com/contrib.html, which includes a link to

Re: SSH + CVS But no login.

2004-10-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Urgh! SYSTEM is the account sshd is running under. Don't remove that. Various Guest/System accounts that weren't the SYSTEM account, I removed IUSR_MOTHER and IWAM_MOTHER, the ASP.NET user etc. I'm wondering why you *first* removed entries from passwd and *then* asked if that's right instead

Re: [PATCH] cygrunsrv --recovery action

2004-10-06 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 6 11:22, Dave Korn wrote: Oh. I should have said which includes a broken link. Try http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Change-Logs.html#Change-Logs instead. Ping webmaster! Changed. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding

Re: SSH + CVS But no login.

2004-10-06 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 6 06:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Urgh! SYSTEM is the account sshd is running under. Don't remove that. Various Guest/System accounts that weren't the SYSTEM account, I removed IUSR_MOTHER and IWAM_MOTHER, the ASP.NET user etc. Ah, ok. That makes it clearer. Without an entry in

Building plugin that is used from multiple executables

2004-10-06 Thread Maarten Boekhold
Hi, Suppose I have a plugin library that contains calls that reside in the executable that dlopen()'s that plugin. You can link such a plugin by using a .def file that contains something like: IMPORTS symbol = executable.exe.symbol Now if I need to be able to use the *same* plugin from *two*

Re: (De)activating network connection

2004-10-06 Thread Jani Tiainen
Brian Dessent wrote: Thiers Botelho wrote: I wish to use some command within a script to activate / deactivate an Ethernet connection. In WinXP this would normally be done thru Settings / Network Connections / Local Connection / right-click . I found _rasdial.exe_ but it seems to deal only with

Re: [PATCH] cygrunsrv --recovery action

2004-10-06 Thread Rainer Hochreiter
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 12:17:49 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Oct 6 11:57, Rainer Hochreiter wrote: well, are there any guidelines how to submit patches and describing ChangeLog syntax available? http://cygwin.com/contrib.html, section When you have finalized your changes thanks for the

Re: [PATCH] cygrunsrv --recovery action

2004-10-06 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 6 13:52, Rainer Hochreiter wrote: On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 12:17:49 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Erm?!? Of course you should write directly to the registry. That's how writing the description field is implemented to stay NT4 compatible. So just copy the behaviour for writing the

RE: [PATCH] cygrunsrv --recovery action

2004-10-06 Thread Dave Korn
-Original Message- From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen Sent: 06 October 2004 13:06 On Oct 6 13:52, Rainer Hochreiter wrote: On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 12:17:49 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Erm?!? Of course you should write directly to the registry. That's how

  1   2   >