Re: TEST VERSION: chere-0.4-1

Hi Dave, Is the test version of 'chere' up on the mirror sites? I cannot seem to locate it through the setup program. BTW, I'm using ver 2.247 of setup.exe with ftp://mirrors.kernel.org as mirror with 'Exp'/'Current' mode. Thanks, Haro From: Dave Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:44:51 -0700 (PDT) ::

Re: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

Christopher Faylor wrote: On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 01:59:12PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: Does anyone know if there is source code available for the binary downloads from ? I've sent a message requesting that they provide source code for their programs but it seems like th

RE: ps -W displays timestamps oddly

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Cobb > Sent: 22 October 2004 03:14 > view_server.exe 18/10/2004 18:55:57 14:55:57 > D:\rational\ClearCase\bin\view_ser > view_server.exe 18/10/2004 18:55:57 14:55:58 > D:\rational\ClearCase\bin\view_ser >explorer.ex

Re: .bashrc not called for non-interactive ssh sessions: SOLUTION

Hi there, I solved similar problem by enabling line PermitUserEnvironment yes in /etc/sshd_config and copying my .bashrc as ~/.ssh/environment In man pages of sshd it says: " 6. Reads the file $HOME/.ssh/environment, if it exists, and users are allowed to change their enviro

Re: Is there a fix for IsBadWritePtr Segfault?

Well, I did find a post in the cygwin-xfree mailing list that had a patch for gdb. I applied the patch and it works well. If anyone knows of a better approach, please post it. http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2004-10/msg00158/segv.diff Thanks, Rich Christopher Faylor wrote: On Thu, Oct 21

Re: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

It looks like it is up to RedHat lawyers to decide if they wish to enforce their license. Bill On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:54:32 +0300, Jani Tiainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 01:59:12PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > >>Does anyone know

RE: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Doctor Bill > Sent: 22 October 2004 15:50 > To: cygwin > Subject: Re: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation? > > It looks like it is up to RedHat lawyers to decide if they wish to > enforce their license. > > Bill TITTLL, to coin a ph

Build/Linker question again (g++)

The error I'm getting now is: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.3.3/libgcc.a(_chkstk.o)(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `__alloca' /usr/lib/libcygwin.a(d85.o)(.text+0x0): first defined here /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.3.3/libgcc.a(_eprintf.o)(.text+0x0):

Re: Is there a fix for IsBadWritePtr Segfault?

On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 09:46:32AM -0400, Richard Schmitt wrote: >Well, I did find a post in the cygwin-xfree mailing list that had a >patch for gdb. I applied the patch and it works well. If anyone knows >of a better approach, please post it. > >http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2004-10/ms

RE: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Doctor Bill >> Sent: 22 October 2004 15:50 >> To: cygwin >> Subject: Re: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation? >> >> It looks like it is up to RedHat lawyers to decide if they wish to >> enforce their license.

RE: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Hannu E K Nevalainen > Sent: 22 October 2004 16:15 > >> -Original Message- > >> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Doctor Bill > >> Sent: 22 October 2004 15:50 > >> To: cygwin > >> Subject: Re: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

RE: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

Christopher Faylor wrote: > Does anyone know if there is source code available for the binary > downloads from ? > > I've sent a message requesting that they provide source code for their > programs but it seems like this is YA case of someone > assuming that they > get to us

RE: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Hughes, Bill > Sent: 22 October 2004 17:03 > To: 'cygwin > Subject: RE: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation? > > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > Does anyone know if there is source code available for the binary > > downloads from

error: `::acosl' undeclared : #INCLUDE and

Hello, I am compiling using the latest Cygwin. My main.cpp starts with: - - - - - - #include #include #include #include #include #include #include "ims/c4s/sa/tuf/Tracker.h" #include "ims/c4s/sa/tuf/TrackInformation.h" using namespace std; - - - - - - My Makefile has: - - - - - - OPTIONS = -

Re: error: `::acosl' undeclared : #INCLUDE and

At 12:28 PM 10/22/2004, you wrote: >Hello, > >I am compiling using the latest Cygwin. >My main.cpp starts with: >- - - - - - >#include >#include >#include >#include >#include >#include >#include "ims/c4s/sa/tuf/Tracker.h" >#include "ims/c4s/sa/tuf/TrackInformation.h" >using namespace std; >-

RE: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

Dave Korn wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Hughes, Bill ..snip.. >> Out of curiosity, what makes you think they are using cygwin code? > > Probably the link on the download page that says > "Precompiled binaries for cygwin on windows". They may have changed

Re: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

Dave Korn schrieb: Found: .\rateless-tunnel.exe rateless-tunnel.exe C:\cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll C:\WINDOWS\System32\ADVAPI32.DLL C:\WINDOWS\System32\ntdll.dll C:\WINDOWS\System32\KERNEL32.dll C:\WINDOWS\System32\RPCRT4.dll [EMAIL PROTECTED] /win/c/downloads/rateless> LOL. T

D0N'T WAIT TO F|ND 0UT...

http://V|Iaggar_CO000Ode1ne_Xanalx_...and___m0O000re http://V||aggar_CO0O00deIne_Xana1x_Va|lum_...and___m0O0O0re http://V||aggar_C00O0OdeIne_Xana1x_Va1lum_C|alIis_...and___m000O0re NOW C||CKING HERE http://posting.fdcngf.com/as#acknowledges -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com

RE: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Hughes, Bill > Sent: 22 October 2004 17:40 > Dave Korn wrote: > >> -Original Message- > >> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Hughes, Bill > ..snip.. > >> Out of curiosity, what makes you think they are using cygwin code? > > > >

RE: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Reini Urban > Sent: 22 October 2004 17:44 > Dave Korn schrieb: > > Found: .\rateless-tunnel.exe > > rateless-tunnel.exe > > C:\cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll > > C:\WINDOWS\System32\ADVAPI32.DLL > > C:\WINDOWS\System32\ntdll.dll >

Re: TEST VERSION: chere-0.4-1

I can see it on the mirror now. I assume it's either been taking awhile to get round to the mirrors, or somebody recently fixed something (probably with my setup.hint - Thanks). Dave. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Is the test version of 'chere' up on the mirror sites? > I cannot

Re: http://rateless.com/ GPL violation?

Dave Korn schrieb: -Original Message- From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Reini Urban Sent: 22 October 2004 17:44 Dave Korn schrieb: Found: .\rateless-tunnel.exe rateless-tunnel.exe C:\cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll C:\WINDOWS\System32\ADVAPI32.DLL C:\WINDOWS\System32\ntdll.dll C:\WINDOW

Cygwin SWIG package - who is using it, and for what?

I took over as packager of SWIG for Cygwin a while ago, and am now getting ready to produce a new package. SWIG seems to make incompatible changes with depressing frequency, so decisions on when to package a new version need to be made with much greater deliberation then other packages - to tha

Re: Cygwin SWIG package - who is using it, and for what?

Max Bowsher schrieb: I took over as packager of SWIG for Cygwin a while ago, and am now getting ready to produce a new package. SWIG seems to make incompatible changes with depressing frequency, so decisions on when to package a new version need to be made with much greater deliberation then ot

Re: snapshot 2004-Oct-10: pthread_cancel() for write() to full pipe

I have discovered that the file "winsup/cygwin/thread.cc" contains a list of which functions are currently cancellation points under cygwin. The comments indicate that read() and write() are not yet but should be. If this has been mentioned in a previous post, I apologize but I was not able to fin

Re: Cygwin SWIG package - who is using it, and for what?

Reini Urban wrote: Max Bowsher schrieb: I took over as packager of SWIG for Cygwin a while ago, and am now getting ready to produce a new package. SWIG seems to make incompatible changes with depressing frequency, so decisions on when to package a new version need to be made with much greater delib

wstring, how?

#include class{ std::wstring wstr; //<<== syntax error before ; token }; g++ -Wall -g -c program.exe -o filename.cpp Can someone tell me what I am dong wrong or why I get this error message? TIA _ MSN® Calendar keeps you organized