Is it time to move the two packages below out of test?
I've made an empty package for regex so that it will do nothing but
delete any previous installation.
Should the other two packages become curr? It's a little odd to have
a package with nothing but a test version.
cgf
- Forwarded
On Jan 5 10:22, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I've made an empty package for regex so that it will do nothing but
delete any previous installation.
Thanks!
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader
Christopher Faylor wrote:
bc is simple and problem-free enough that I don't mind maintaining
it. I'll upload a new version with readline support shortly.
Ahhh, I should've waited just a tiny bit longer =)
Lapo
--
Lapo Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP X.509 keys available)
Is it time to move the two packages below out of test?
I've made an empty package for regex so that it will do nothing but
delete any previous installation.
I had completely forgotten that nfs-server was only
in test. Yes, please - do move it into curr.
-Samrobb
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:21:02PM -0500, Robb, Sam wrote:
Is it time to move the two packages below out of test?
I've made an empty package for regex so that it will do nothing but
delete any previous installation.
I had completely forgotten that nfs-server was only
in test. Yes, please -
I've downloaded cygwin/x to my windows xp platform.
In /usr/X11R6/bin I see the following x clients: xhost, xdpyinfo, xclock,
xeyes ... but I don't see xterm. Shouldn't I have an xterm? I also don't see
a startx or startxwin.bat file anyplace in the cygwin/x freeware ... and I
don't see any
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Meadows, Marty wrote:
I've downloaded cygwin/x to my windows xp platform.
In /usr/X11R6/bin I see the following x clients: xhost, xdpyinfo, xclock,
xeyes ... but I don't see xterm. Shouldn't I have an xterm? I also don't see
a startx or startxwin.bat file anyplace in the
Meadows, Marty wrote:
I've downloaded cygwin/x to my windows xp platform.
In /usr/X11R6/bin I see the following x clients: xhost, xdpyinfo, xclock,
xeyes ... but I don't see xterm. Shouldn't I have an xterm? I also don't see
a startx or startxwin.bat file anyplace in the cygwin/x freeware ... and
Meadows, Marty wrote:
I've downloaded cygwin/x to my windows xp platform.
In /usr/X11R6/bin I see the following x clients: xhost, xdpyinfo, xclock,
xeyes ... but I don't see xterm. Shouldn't I have an xterm? I also don't see
a startx or startxwin.bat file anyplace in the cygwin/x freeware ... and
my main program 'mpsvcd.exe' dynamically loads a shared library using
dlopen(). one of the functions from this shared library calls popen() to
read the standard output from another executable - and this fails with the
error messages listed below! using system() instead of popen() to start
the
On Jan 4 17:17, Sam Steingold wrote:
* Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-12-23 10:35:16 +0100]:
My temporary fix for my developers is to remove coreutils `link' from
our systems,
that's what I had to do too.
but if it is reinstalled every time coreutils is
upgraded, this
On Jan 5 10:19, Rainer Hochreiter wrote:
my main program 'mpsvcd.exe' dynamically loads a shared library using
dlopen(). one of the functions from this shared library calls popen() to
read the standard output from another executable - and this fails with the
error messages listed below! using
On Jan 5 10:19, Rainer Hochreiter wrote:
my main program 'mpsvcd.exe' dynamically loads a shared library using
dlopen(). one of the functions from this shared library calls popen() to
read the standard output from another executable - and this fails with
the
error messages listed below!
On Jan 5 13:08, Rainer Hochreiter wrote:
See /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/rebase-2.3.README.
is this a new package?
Nope.
didn't find it in my installation, but now I have it ;-)
well, do i have to rebase all DLLs on my installation, or only that
one mentioned by the error message?
won't
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:43:36PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
well, do i have to rebase all DLLs on my installation, or only that
one mentioned by the error message? won't destroy my installation
if doing the wrong thing;-)
I'd try to rebase only your own dll first.
IMO, rebasing
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:02:54AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
The bottom line is, you can complain, but the better solution is to
make your environment more foolproof against changes in one part of it.
In case of MSDEV tools I suggest to put the MSDEV tool path in front of
the Cygwin paths.
I can install and run cygwin, but (at least) one application won't work either
under cygwin or cygwin/x. When I run perl, I get the message
C:\cygwin\bin\perl.exe (2208): *** cygheap version mismatch detected - 0x6179000
0/0xBF.
You have multiple copies of cygwin1.dll on your system.
Search
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C:\cygwin\bin\perl.exe (2208): *** cygheap version mismatch detected - 0x6179000
0/0xBF.
You have multiple copies of cygwin1.dll on your system.
[...]
I'm rather puzzled -- any clues, anyone?
http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
--
Unsubscribe info:
I have been working with this versions of Subversion
1.0.6-1
1.1.1-1
1.1.2-1
snv+ssh doesn't work for me since 1.1.1-1
This is my test case:
svnadmin create /repotest
svn list file:///repotest
svn list file://localhost/repotest
svn list svn+ssh://localhost/repotest
chmod -R 777 /repotest
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:02:54AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
The bottom line is, you can complain, but the better solution is to
make your environment more foolproof against changes in one part of
it. In case of MSDEV tools I suggest to put the MSDEV tool path in
cygcheck.out
Description: cygcheck -s output
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gerrit has admonished me, and I am abashed -- I've run cygcheck (below).
You have actually read the website I quoted?
I.e. this:
Run cygcheck -s -v -r cygcheck.out and include that file as an
attachment in your report. Please do not compress or otherwise encode
the
For reasons I don't understand, the text content of the referenced
message does not show up in my mailreader (gnus) or the archive [1],
so here it is again. See the archive [1] for cygcheck output.
./configure --without-x11 --pdump --with-modules=no
. . .
make
. . .
./xemacs -nd -batch -l
Sorry -- my email client must have de-attached the text file upon sending. It
does show up as an attachment in my sent directory, fwiw (nothing, I know).
Anyway, I did check hidden and system directories -- no other cygwin1.dll's.
(Incidentally, I find the old DOSish command
dir /s /a-d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Henry S. Thompson) writes:
[see subject]
Suggestions? I tried using Jason Tishler's rebase on xemacs.exe, but
it refused. . .
Ah, but rebasing cygwin1.dll _did_ fix the problem (once I had tracked
down cygserver and cygrunsrv in the Process Manager and nuked them).
ht
--
Diego Ernesto Malpica Chauvet wrote:
I have been working with this versions of Subversion
1.0.6-1
1.1.1-1
1.1.2-1
snv+ssh doesn't work for me since 1.1.1-1
This is my test case:
svnadmin create /repotest
svn list file:///repotest
svn list file://localhost/repotest
svn list
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, fbartlet wrote:
Anyway, I did check hidden and system directories -- no other
cygwin1.dll's. (Incidentally, I find the old DOSish command
dir /s /a-d cygwin1.dll
easier to deal with than the Windows GUI. The result's the same, too.)
I did a complete reinstallation of
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Max Bowsher wrote:
Diego Ernesto Malpica Chauvet wrote:
I have been working with this versions of Subversion
1.0.6-1
1.1.1-1
1.1.2-1
snv+ssh doesn't work for me since 1.1.1-1
This is my test case:
svnadmin create /repotest
svn list file:///repotest
svn
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Emil Rojas wrote:
I am providing grep with a long list of files, e.g. 1200 files with
about 80K characters.
I get the following
bash: /bin/grep: Argument list too long
If I reduce the total characters to less then 32K it works fine. This
list is a list of the source
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Would adding a /etc/profile.d/subversion.sh with
export PATH=/usr/lib/subversion/bin:$PATH
be a good solution, or was the whole point to not have the executables in
the PATH?
Already exists!
But for an ssh single command, no login shell is ever executed, so profile
is not
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Isaac Foraker
Sent: 04 January 2005 22:27
I'll be plain. I try to contribute feedback to open source projects
that I use.
How apposite that, in audio terms, feedback is synonymous with a loud
whining noise!
cheers,
So, I recently updated all my Cygwin stuff. I wanted to play around
with a few of the KDE apps, especially the Konsole application, as I
like the idea of a tabbed terminal window.
Anyways, now that everything has been updated, I'm seeing some very
strange behavior.
When I run random Windows
Igor,
Did you reboot since then?
Yes.
Do you have any Cygwin services running?
No -- I've even run listDLLs
http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/listdlls.shtml
to double-check.
What's the output of cygcheck /bin/perl.exe?
$ cygcheck /bin/perl.exe
C:/cygwin/bin/perl.exe
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Emil Rojas wrote:
At 10:26 AM 1/5/2005, you wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Emil Rojas wrote:
I am providing grep with a long list of files, e.g. 1200 files with
about 80K characters.
I get the following
bash: /bin/grep: Argument list too long
If I
Hughes, Bill wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:02:54AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
The bottom line is, you can complain, but the better solution is to
make your environment more foolproof against changes in one part of
it. In case of MSDEV tools I suggest to put the
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:30:50AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can install and run cygwin, but (at least) one application won't work
either under cygwin or cygwin/x. When I run perl, I get the message
C:\cygwin\bin\perl.exe (2208): *** cygheap version mismatch detected -
0x6179000
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:51:09AM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:30:50AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can install and run cygwin, but (at least) one application won't work
either under cygwin or cygwin/x. When I run perl, I get the message
Rodrigo de Salvo Braz writes:
The point would be to bring this to the attention of the people
being negative. By seeing that not just one person feels like that,
people may decide to stop and think whether their ways are
constructive. Hopefully this would effect a change for the better.
A clue, perhaps.
The error from perl is
C:\cygwin\bin\perl.exe (1692): *** cygheap version mismatch detected - 0x6179000
0/0xBF.
You have multiple copies of cygwin1.dll on your system.
Search for cygwin1.dll using the Windows Start-Find/Search facility
and delete all but the most recent
Sharma, Pallavi (GE Healthcare) wrote:
The problem is not with killing the xinetd process. I can kill it by running /etc/rc.d/init.d/xinetd stop.
Killing xinetd ist not the problem, but...?
Now i am facing a new problem.
telnet/ftp service is hanging. :-(
xinetd process is running but telnet and
Christopher Warth wrote:
Wow! You're not kidding - cygwin cvs performance is comparable to
native performance on local drives.
I wonder if you could try running a cvs pserver on the machine hosting
the CVS repository. In other words, it might be faster to go through
pserver than through
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 03:15:31PM -0500, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Rodrigo de Salvo Braz writes:
The point would be to bring this to the attention of the people
being negative. By seeing that not just one person feels like that,
people may decide to stop and think whether their ways are
Henry,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 05:22:48PM +, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
Suggestions? I tried using Jason Tishler's rebase on xemacs.exe,
but it refused. . .
Ah, but rebasing cygwin1.dll _did_ fix the problem (once I had tracked
down cygserver and cygrunsrv in the Process Manager and
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 03:05:12PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:51:09AM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:30:50AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can install and run cygwin, but (at least) one application won't work
either
Same programme compiled under Cygwin writes output which differs form its
LINUX-compiled version
I apologise in advance if the question is too trivial but I am a simple user
and not a programmer.
I have written a small FORTRAN programme which reads and writes numbers in a
file:
program toto
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:05:27PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 03:05:12PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
[blah]
Thanks for correcting me.
Wow. You're welcome.
Can you think of some wording in the error message which would make this
clearer?
cgf
--
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 04:16:46PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:05:27PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 03:05:12PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
[blah]
Thanks for correcting me.
Wow. You're welcome.
Can you think of some
Chris Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When I run random Windows applications, Cygrunsrv.exe starts
consuming almost all the CPU.
Yes, I saw the same thing last night, after having updated my Cygwin
installation over the weekend. In my case I was toying around with
Exact Audio Copy, with bash,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:23:35PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 04:16:46PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:05:27PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 03:05:12PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
[blah]
I'd like to build the supporting Cygwin DLLs to be renamed to something
other than cyg*.dll (e.g. cygwin1.dll to foo.dll), what is the best way to
build the DLLs with different names?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
Jason Tishler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Henry,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 05:22:48PM +, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
Suggestions? I tried using Jason Tishler's rebase on xemacs.exe,
but it refused. . .
Ah, but rebasing cygwin1.dll _did_ fix the problem (once I had tracked
down cygserver
I have similar problem than the one posted a while ago in
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-02/msg00842.html
Using cygwin/g77, in a PC with 1024 Mb of physical memory.
After compiling and running the following test program
the limit of 160 Mb cannot be surpassed.
implicit double precision
I want to reinstall the cygwin utilities on my computer,
but am confused by thev list of packages.
Can i find some place which gives a good description of them?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Dante Chialvo wrote:
I have similar problem than the one posted a while ago in
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-02/msg00842.html
Using cygwin/g77, in a PC with 1024 Mb of physical memory.
After compiling and running the following test program
the limit of 160 Mb cannot be surpassed.
- Original Message -
From: bytemaster1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dave Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: GDB (no debugging symbols found)
Dave Korn wrote:
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of bytemaster1
Sent: 03 January
Dear emailer.
I am barely checking this email address this month.
If this is a time sensitive Gen Art related matter - please email me at [EMAIL
PROTECTED] or call me at 212.255.7300 x205. If it is personal email me at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (I check on weekends) or 917.225.9251.
If this is
Using the 20050104 snapshot, running cygcheck -c from bash in a
console window with tty set and hitting control-C or kill'ing the
process (from another window) results in a burst of garbage to the
screen, and cygcheck -c continues on.
Cygwin Configuration Diagnostics
Current System Time: Wed Jan
At 02:22 PM 1/5/2005, you wrote:
If those 'experienced' users are that fed up with participating in the project
then perhaps they should just take a deep breath and avoid sending a response
to those questions at all. Sometimes silence is better.
And there's the rub. Sometimes silence is
Hi all,
Not sure if the highly obscene limericks (/usr/share/fortune/limerick)
are meant to be in the cygwin distro...
Kalman Dee
Canberra, OZ
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:
Hi all,
Not sure if the highly obscene limericks
(/usr/share/fortune/limerick) are meant to be in the cygwin distro...
Kalman Dee
Canberra, OZ
Um, yeah, I have to second that. And I don't even want to know what the
French ones say. A little on the blue side, Powers That Be, and by a
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:36:02PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
Using the 20050104 snapshot, running cygcheck -c from bash in a
console window with tty set and hitting control-C or kill'ing the
process (from another window) results in a burst of garbage to the
screen, and cygcheck -c
Dave Korn wrote:
How apposite that, in audio terms, feedback is
synonymous with a
loud whining noise!
Except that in audio, negative feedback is the kind you want. :)
...until you're READY TO ROCK!
--
Gary R. Van Sickle
--
Unsubscribe info:
At 02:22 PM 1/5/2005, you wrote:
If those 'experienced' users are that fed up with
participating in the project then perhaps they should just
take a deep breath and avoid sending a response to those
questions at all. Sometimes silence is better.
And there's the rub. Sometimes silence
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 02:36:53PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure if the highly obscene limericks (/usr/share/fortune/limerick)
are meant to be in the cygwin distro...
Wow. I think I vaguely recall that something like this was in fortune
but, if I thought it was a good idea a couple of
On Wednesday, January 05, 2005 10:58 PM [EST], Gary R. Van Sickle
wrote:
Hi all,
Not sure if the highly obscene limericks
(/usr/share/fortune/limerick) are meant to be in the cygwin
distro...
Kalman Dee
Canberra, OZ
Um, yeah, I have to second that. And I don't even want to know
what
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:32:14PM -0500, Brian Bruns wrote:
Remember, alot of these have been in the fortunes package for god
knows how long, and Cygwin isn't the only one thats going to have
them. I'm betting that any distro that has the Fortunes package has
them too.
Right. The README of the
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:26:08PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 02:36:53PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure if the highly obscene limericks (/usr/share/fortune/limerick)
are meant to be in the cygwin distro...
Wow. I think I vaguely recall that something
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:05:13PM -0500, Christopher Faylor [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:36:02PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
Using the 20050104 snapshot, running cygcheck -c from bash in a
console window with tty set and hitting control-C or kill'ing the
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 08:40:16PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:26:08PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 02:36:53PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure if the highly obscene limericks (/usr/share/fortune/limerick)
are meant to be in
On Wednesday, January 05, 2005 10:58 PM [EST], Gary R. Van Sickle
wrote:
Hi all,
Not sure if the highly obscene limericks
(/usr/share/fortune/limerick) are meant to be in the
cygwin distro...
Kalman Dee
Canberra, OZ
Um, yeah, I have to second that. And I don't even want to
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:32:14PM -0500, Brian Bruns wrote:
Remember, alot of these have been in the fortunes package
for god knows
how long, and Cygwin isn't the only one thats going to have
them. I'm
betting that any distro that has the Fortunes package has them too.
Right. The
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 03:15:31PM -0500, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Rodrigo de Salvo Braz writes:
The point would be to bring this to the attention of the people
being negative. By seeing that not just one person feels
like that,
people may decide to stop and think whether
I agree. As a Christian I find such fortune comments disgusting and
they should be burned.
Zach
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:54:16 -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:32:14PM -0500, Brian Bruns wrote:
Remember, alot of these have been in the fortunes
Maybe the package maintainer could consider building two packages : a
'clean' fortune and rename the current package to 'fortune-xxx'. I have no
idea how easy or difficult this is, but it would satisfy both camps.
Steve
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:54:16 -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
My write-in candidate:
[x] Not offended. Clean it up anyway. It's unprofessional in the extreme
and can only result in embarassment and trouble.
As a Christian, I agree with Gary. :)
I actually think it's an upstream bug. The
rant
Maybe we should all wear helmets and seatbelts when at the keyboard
too, just so nobody gets hurt. This political correctness makes me
think of what it must have been like in the USSR in 1955.
Remember what Bobby Slaton says, If you can't laugh at yourself...
...make fun of other people!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ ] Offended. Think about the children!
[x] Not offended. Stop bothering me with your Puritanical values.
[ ] Don't care. Can we go back to talking about how negative this list is
now?
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:47:35PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 08:40:16PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:26:08PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 02:36:53PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure if the
78 matches
Mail list logo
