Re: Different commands give different groups

2011-10-01 Thread Eric Blake
On 09/30/2011 09:49 PM, gsingh93 wrote: Why do these two commands give different groups? It's the same user. Because the effective gid set for the existing process differs from the recorded groups in /etc/groups - most likely, you've changed /etc/groups but haven't logged out and back in to

Re: [TESTING] Updated: subversion-1.7.0rc4-1

2011-10-01 Thread Reini Urban
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:07 PM, David Rothenberger wrote: > IMPORTANT: This release has a new working copy format. To use this > release, you must manually upgrade your working copy format, > rendering it unusable with previous major releases. > > Please see the release notes >  http://subversion.

Re: tic0 dependency, was: urxvt-X terminfo and Bash readline

2011-10-01 Thread Tom Roche
Charles Wilson Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:27:05 -0400 >>> Note that in most cases (e.g. cygwin installations that were "in >>> service" prior to 2-3 months ago, and had installed rxvt-unicode >>> "back then") already had the "old" database entry installed -- and >>> so only need the "new" one which *does

Re: tic0 dependency, was: urxvt-X terminfo and Bash readline

2011-10-01 Thread Charles Wilson
On 10/1/2011 8:53 PM, Tom Roche wrote: > Charles Wilson Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:28:05 -0400 >> This. info.exe is linked to cygncurses-8.dll, which is the last >> version of ncurses on cygwin that used the old database > > So ... given that (correct me if wrong) `info` is part of the base > cygwin dist

OpenSSH - sshd logon failure

2011-10-01 Thread gsingh93
I had set this up a while ago on a different computer, but I can't get it running now. I've followed the directions at http://pigtail.net/LRP/printsrv/cygwin-sshd.html and I'm getting the following error. Gulshan@GSJK-PC ~ $ cygrunsrv -S sshd cygrunsrv: Error starting a service: StartService: Wi

Re: Different commands give different groups

2011-10-01 Thread gsingh93
That makes sense, but I've completely restarted my computer and yet it still shows the old groups. So a new process that uses the new groups hasn't started. Any idea why? eblake wrote: > > On 09/30/2011 09:49 PM, gsingh93 wrote: >> >> Why do these two commands give different groups? It's the sam