RE: cygwin archive? (previous versions for fallback)

2003-03-12 Thread Polley Christopher W
From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Jason Tishler wrote: [snip] However, Cygwin setup.exe's cache should have all previous versions installed including PostgreSQL unless one deletes them. Hence, the old PostgreSQL version should still have been available

RE: Hello. (running programs as daemon)

2002-11-12 Thread Polley Christopher W
Hello. This is my first mail to the list. Well, for starters, you'll need to put a better subject line on your posts. You might want to peruse http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html for additional tips. I have this problem... ... it [Redir v.2.1] really works. but when i close my

RE: Alternate Cygwin download methods (was Re: NO hugepackages, please!)

2002-11-08 Thread Polley Christopher W
From: Max Bowsher [mailto:maxb;ukf.net] I thought I might as well mention my download method: I wrote a little script to get a setup.ini file from a mirror, and then use Michael Chase's clean_setup.pl to make a list of URLs to get, and pass that to wget. I then invoke clean_setup.pl again, which

RE: Alternate Cygwin download methods (was Re: NO hugepackages, please!)

2002-11-08 Thread Polley Christopher W
From: Max Bowsher [mailto:maxb;ukf.net] Polley Christopher W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Max Bowsher [mailto:maxb;ukf.net] I thought I might as well mention my download method: I wrote a little script to get a setup.ini file from a mirror, ... Sounds useful. :-) Care to share it? I

RE: how to set To: and Subject: with ssmtp

2002-10-29 Thread Polley Christopher W
You might also try formail, which is included in the procmail package. From: Marcos Lorenzo I'm unable to fill some fields in mail header with ssmtp: When I run: marcos@MOZART ~$ echo testing mail | ssmtp -f administrador@mozart -F Administrador [EMAIL PROTECTED] I get the following: ...

RE: Viruses being transported with Cygwin messages

2002-10-14 Thread Polley Christopher W
Robert, It's probably not your system that is infected -- Bugbear, like KLEZ, uses addresses harvested from the infected system in spoofed From headers. The only way I've been able to guess at the real identity for bugbear-infected mail that I've received (from friends/family) is to search

RE: Printing postscript file

2002-04-02 Thread Polley Christopher W
I don't use XP, so this is based on my NT/W2K/95/ME experience, but when used in conjunction with '//host', 'name' should be the name that it is shared as -- from the Sharing... menu option. Type \\JASON in your Start-Run dialog -- that will show you the shares that are exposed. HTH, Chris

strace on inetd (was RE: bash failed to initialize ontelnet/rsh/ rlogin server)

2002-03-27 Thread Polley Christopher W
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: bash failed to initialize on telnet/rsh/rlogin server On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:05:20AM -0600, Polley Christopher W wrote: So now that I know how to isolate the problem, is there a way to strace a daemon? strace -p pid cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http

bash failed to initialize on telnet/rsh/rlogin server

2002-03-26 Thread Polley Christopher W
I'm trying to get inetd set up for telnet/rsh/rlogin on my machine and have everything going up to the point that after login.exe gives the motd to the telnet client, a dialog window pops up on the server titled bash.exe - Application Error and says The application failed to initialize properly

RE: Debugging cygwin

2002-03-26 Thread Polley Christopher W
Bill, The debug_printf statements get printed when you run your program under strace. (see http://cygwin.com/faq/faq.html#TOC111 ) Also, here are some excellent tips that cgf has given on strace and debugging cygwin1.dll: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2000-11/msg01469.html (BTW, google is

RE: Setting up user mode cron

2002-01-10 Thread Polley Christopher W
You wrote: At 01:45 PM 1/10/2002, Andrew DeFaria wrote: Anyway, cron has no access to them. It's running under SYSTEM account which has only access to publicly available net drives, that is, drives which are available w/o any form of

RE: bootstrap/5149: gcc-20011217 reads beyond EOF on cygwin

2001-12-21 Thread Polley Christopher W
-Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 03:42:14PM +0100, Werner Tuchan wrote: Weird. The bytes after EOF are a mixture of NULs and 0xc0. Is 0xc0 of special significance in Windows? Is your version of cygwin the AFAIR, I once

RE: cygwin1.dll (file version 1003.6.0.0) dup problem with gcc

2001-12-17 Thread Polley Christopher W
I've been looking into this problem myself, (see last month's thread starting with http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2001-11/msg01217.html ) and have gotten to this point: at the point where vfork is duplicating the fhandler table and dup'ing open fh's it somehow isn't detecting that stdin isn't

RE: cygwin1.dll (file version 1003.6.0.0) dup problem with gcc

2001-12-17 Thread Polley Christopher W
it. If you can, debugging Cygwin via gdb would be the best way to go. Alternatively, if you can't do that, calling gcc indirectly through strace in your IDE environment would provide some trace information Here is a strace snippet right around the error's occurrence: