Re: mark-active (was: [1.7] Updated: {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1)

2009-05-18 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 03:11:52 -0700 (PDT) > From: Marc Girod > > > Two more changes I noticed with 23.0.92 (with respect to 21.2): These questions are not Cygwin-specific, so they are best asked on emacs-devel or help-gnu-emacs, but since you asked... > 1. mark-active stays t after use (e.

RE: mark-active (was: [1.7] Updated: {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1)

2009-05-18 Thread Phil Betts
Marc Girod wrote: > Two more changes I noticed with 23.0.92 (with respect to 21.2): > > 1. mark-active stays t after use (e.g. in the *shell* buffer), > with the result that the visual effect to mark the region gets > sticky. I can't help you here. I've not tried cygwin's 23.0.92 yet, but I can'

Re: mark-active (was: [1.7] Updated: {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1)

2009-05-18 Thread Marc Girod
Marc Girod wrote: > > Two more changes I noticed with 23.0.92 (with respect to 21.2): > A third one: 3. in the *shell* buffer, M-p (comint-previous-input) will not only affect the line at the prompt, but also remove anything below it in the buffer. I used to push with C-o (open-line) comman

mark-active (was: [1.7] Updated: {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1)

2009-05-18 Thread Marc Girod
Two more changes I noticed with 23.0.92 (with respect to 21.2): 1. mark-active stays t after use (e.g. in the *shell* buffer), with the result that the visual effect to mark the region gets sticky. 2. in a file buffer, doing C-x C-f (find-file) and RET will not read the file again, but instead

Re: [1.7] Updated: {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1

2009-05-17 Thread Marc Girod
Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > This means that an existing Emacs variable > `operating-system-release', whose value is derived from uts.release, > should hold either "1.5.SOMETHING" or "1.7.SOMETHING", and that can be > used to distinguish between the two Cygwin families. > Indeed. I found it on 23.0

Re: [1.7] Updated: {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1

2009-05-17 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 00:33:13 -0400 > From: Christopher Faylor > > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 06:12:04AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 02:52:22 -0700 (PDT) > >> From: Marc Girod > >> > >> Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> > > >> > ...if Emacs could know the Cygwin version. >

Re: [1.7] Updated: {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1

2009-05-16 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 06:12:04AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 02:52:22 -0700 (PDT) >> From: Marc Girod >> >> Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> > >> > ...if Emacs could know the Cygwin version. >> > >> uname -r >> >> this gives on 2 installations e.g.: >> >> 1.5.25(0.156/4/2)

Re: [1.7] Updated: {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1

2009-05-16 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 02:52:22 -0700 (PDT) > From: Marc Girod > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > ...if Emacs could know the Cygwin version. > > > uname -r > > this gives on 2 installations e.g.: > > 1.5.25(0.156/4/2) > 1.7.0(0.210/5/3) > > $ ./uname -s > CYGWIN_NT-6.0 I meant an Emacs func

Re: [1.7] Updated: {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1

2009-05-16 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Marc Girod on 5/16/2009 4:17 AM: > > Marc Girod wrote: >> uname -r >> this gives on 2 installations e.g.: >> >> 1.5.25(0.156/4/2) >> 1.7.0(0.210/5/3) >> >> $ ./uname -s >> CYGWIN_NT-6.0 > uname -s is wrong (you will get the same answe

Re: [1.7] Updated: {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1

2009-05-16 Thread Marc Girod
Marc Girod wrote: > > uname -r > Er... maybe you would object that this is part of coreutils, and thus not necessarily of every cygwin installation... Marc -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--1.7--Updated%3A-%7Bemacs%2Cemacs-X11%2Cemacs-el%7D-23.0.92-1-tp23559935p23

Re: [1.7] Updated: {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1

2009-05-16 Thread Marc Girod
I just noticed that my /usr/share/info/dir file was reduced to a bare minimum: 2 lines for libc and libm... I had just updated 1.7 to the latest... My setup.log.full has indeed: unlink C:\cygwin2/usr/share/info/dir unlink C:\cygwin2/usr/share/info/libc.info unlink C:\cygwin2/usr/share/info/libm.

Re: [1.7] Updated: {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1

2009-05-16 Thread Marc Girod
Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > ...if Emacs could know the Cygwin version. > uname -r this gives on 2 installations e.g.: 1.5.25(0.156/4/2) 1.7.0(0.210/5/3) $ ./uname -s CYGWIN_NT-6.0 Marc -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--1.7--Updated%3A-%7Bemacs%2Cemacs-X11%2Cemacs-

Re: [1.7] Updated: {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1

2009-05-16 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 09:29:37 -0400 > From: Ken Brown > CC: cygwin at cygwin dot com > > (concat ".newmail-" > (file-name-nondirectory >(if (memq system-type '(windows-nt cygwin ms-dos)) >;; cannot have colons in file name >(replace-r

Re: [1.7] Updated: {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1

2009-05-15 Thread Ken Brown
On 5/15/2009 9:09 AM, gustav wrote: Dear Ken, First, thank you so much for having taken care of Emacs! I enclose a patch to rmail.el, which I always have to apply, because version 21.2 normally attempts to create files with "po:", but neither Windows nor Cygwin tolerate that. Current rmail.el c

[ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1

2009-05-15 Thread Ken Brown
New experimental versions of the emacs, emacs-X11, and emacs-el packages are now available for download for those testing cygwin 1.7, replacing the previous experimental 22.1-3 packages. I have left 21.2-13 as current. CYGWIN NEWS: This is the first release in almost two years, af