Problem:
The mount -u command fails if a domain user's registry hive is not
downloaded from the domain controller and no local hive cache exists.
Solution:
Change cygwin1.dll/mount to
1. store mount information under HKLM/CYGWIN/MOUNTS/{USER-SID}, or
2. let mount succeed without persisting the
This is in reply to Christopher Faylor's message
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-09/msg01428.html. I hope it will show up
correctly in the mail list.
> .. I expect that, as time progresses, there will be more checks to
> ensure that doesn't happen. 1.3.13 has new checks for this, in fact.
Thi
This is in reply to Christopher Faylor's post
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-09/msg01430.html
> I am trying to set the mind set here. As the person responsible for
cygwin
> development, that's how we are progressing.
I totally agree and apreciate the openness.
> Actually, it doesn't work al
How about breaking free from using the windoze registry. There is
absolutely no special need to use it IMO. All the mount info can be stored
in a plain ASCII file like 'cygwin.cfg'. As part of its initialization the
cygwin1.dll can use GetModuleFileName() to figure out from where it was
loaded
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:38:21PM -0700, Doru Carastan wrote:
> How about breaking free from using the windoze registry. There is
> absolutely no special need to use it IMO.
I'll second that. Relying on a single monolithic binary file for system
critical information is an extraordinarily bad i
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Doru Carastan wrote:
> How about breaking free from using the windoze registry. There is
> absolutely no special need to use it IMO. All the mount info can be stored
> in a plain ASCII file like 'cygwin.cfg'. As part of its initialization the
> cygwin1.dll can use GetModu
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 23:15, Charles Krug wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:38:21PM -0700, Doru Carastan wrote:
> > How about breaking free from using the windoze registry. There is
> > absolutely no special need to use it IMO.
>
> I'll second that. Relying on a single monolithic binary file
> On the user mount in HKLM idea, it's a no-goer. Normal users don't
> have write access to most of HKLM, on any partly-secure install
> of NT (which is where the original posters issue arose).
I may be wrong, but couldn't setup, or whoever creates the original
HKLM/../cygwin key, set up the se
On Sat, 2002-09-28 at 00:19, Dan Vasaru wrote:
>
> > On the user mount in HKLM idea, it's a no-goer. Normal users don't
> > have write access to most of HKLM, on any partly-secure install
> > of NT (which is where the original posters issue arose).
>
> I may be wrong, but couldn't setup, or who
neous users. But we'll
go with it while waiting for a better mount.
Thanks, Dan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Robert Collins
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:28 PM
To: Dan Vasaru
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Proposal] Moving
On Sat, 2002-09-28 at 00:57, Dan Vasaru wrote:
>
> Robert,
>
> Your solution only works if the users are local administrators, as a domain
> user has no rights to HKLM (and hence to create a system mount). In our
> case, giving all users local administrator rights is an acceptable solution,
> b
Robert,
>FWIW the HKLM user mounts would have the same security
>ramification (which is why it's not a generically viable solution).
True, but one could fine-tune access rights to "HKLM/Software/Cygwin" such
that:
1) All users have "Create subkey" permission in "HKLM/./Cygwin/Users".
2) All
On 9/26/2002 9:38 PM, Doru Carastan wrote:
> How about breaking free from using the windoze registry. There is
> absolutely no special need to use it IMO. All the mount info can
> be stored in a plain ASCII file like 'cygwin.cfg'. As part of its
> initialization the cygwin1.dll can use GetM
u Carastan
- Original Message -
From: "Igor Pechtchanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Doru Carastan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 6:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Moving user mount information to HKLM
> On Thu
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 06:49:00PM -0700, Doru Carastan wrote:
>This is totally great news. I don't monitor the deloper list but it is great
>to hear that my http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-02/msg00805.html
>suggestion is being considered. I am totally sorry about the fact that I
>couldn't ge
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 07:47:28PM -0700, Doru Carastan wrote:
>>.. I expect that, as time progresses, there will be more checks to
>>ensure that doesn't happen. 1.3.13 has new checks for this, in fact.
>
>This makes sense only if RH views Cygwin as an Microsoft Windows OS
>UNIX extension and no
> This is in reply to Christopher Faylor's post
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-09/msg01430.html
>
> With this in mind I will like you to consider publishing in the Cygwin FAQ
> the guidlines one should use for distributing an (open source) application
> outside the official net release. I beli
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:50:28AM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
>>This is in reply to Christopher Faylor's post
>>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-09/msg01430.html
>>
>>With this in mind I will like you to consider publishing in the Cygwin
>>FAQ the guidlines one should use for distributin
18 matches
Mail list logo
