Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 02:10:14PM +0200, Angelo Graziosi wrote: >I have observed with recent snapshots (20050922, 20050923 19:07:57 but >also with some previous snaps) that when one closes the Emacs window >(after the work is finished), in the xterm window, appear a lot of of >lines like these: >

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

I have observed with recent snapshots (20050922, 20050923 19:07:57 but also with some previous snaps) that when one closes the Emacs window (after the work is finished), in the xterm window, appear a lot of of lines like these: -- 2638536 [sig]

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

> I pulled the 0919, and 0920 snapshots and both don't run .bat files correctly. > > With the 0901 snapshot and with 1.5.18-1, when I run duh.bat (which > contains the following > and is attached), I see: > REM AHA > echo "AHAHAHA" > > With either the 0919, 0920 snapshot I see the following: > > du

A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

Greetings, I pulled the 0919, and 0920 snapshots and both don't run .bat files correctly. With the 0901 snapshot and with 1.5.18-1, when I run duh.bat (which contains the following and is attached), I see: REM AHA echo "AHAHAHA" With either the 0919, 0920 snapshot I see the following: duh.bat:

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:32:17PM -0700, David Rothenberger wrote: >On 9/19/2005 1:28 PM, David Rothenberger wrote: >>I've attached a sample Windows program that just invokes Sleep() as >>well as a driver script. Compile the Windows program with: > >The driver script didn't come through for some r

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

On 9/19/2005 1:28 PM, David Rothenberger wrote: I've attached a sample Windows program that just invokes Sleep() as well as a driver script. Compile the Windows program with: The driver script didn't come through for some reason. Here it is. --[ sleep.sh ]--

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

I'm seeing a regression with the 20050919 snapshot. I have a bash script that invokes a Windows program (Sun's Java JDK to be exact). I used to be able to press Ctrl-C to kill the Windows program. Now, Ctrl-C doesn't terminate the Windows program or the bash script. I can press Ctrl-Z and then "kil

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 08:29:38PM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote: >>However, I *really* do appreciate all of the testing that we've seen so >>far. I hope everyone who has tested previous snapshots will continue to >>test this one and any other snapshots up until I eventually release 1.5.19. > >I s

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

P.P.S: Yes, JAVA_HOME must be posix format, and uses cygpath --^^^ ANT and converts it into DOS style. -- PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) available from wwwkeys.de.pgp.net key-fingerprint 550D F17E B082 A3E9 F913 9E53 3D35 C9BA 9F8A 785D s

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

However, I *really* do appreciate all of the testing that we've seen so far. I hope everyone who has tested previous snapshots will continue to test this one and any other snapshots up until I eventually release 1.5.19. I saw that 20050915 was out and started the OOo testsuite again ;) The att

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:41:06PM -0500, Brian Ford wrote: > >Regression from 1.5.18. It seems gethostbyname is not working > >correctly from secondary threads: > > This should be fixed in the latest snapshot from 2005-Sep-14. It is. Thanks! >

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 10:39:22AM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote: >>>$ ./loop.csh >>>loop >>>Thu Sep 15 00:28:01 2005 >>>(nothing, no output) . >>> >>>You will see in the windows task manager that cppumaker is doing something >>>but then it will hang. cppumaker will vanish from task manager

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

$ ./loop.csh loop Thu Sep 15 00:28:01 2005 (nothing, no output) . You will see in the windows task manager that cppumaker is doing something but then it will hang. cppumaker will vanish from task manager but a "zombie" perl will remain. This perl will not be mentioned in the ps output. I

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

$ ./loop.csh loop Thu Sep 15 00:28:01 2005 (nothing, no output) . You will see in the windows task manager that cppumaker is doing something but then it will hang. cppumaker will vanish from task manager but a "zombie" perl will remain. This perl will not be mentioned in the ps output. I

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 12:55:20AM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote: >>>Can you duplicate this hang at will or does it take a full run of an >>>OpenOffice >>>build to tickle it? >> >>So far (two cases) it hang in different places. It happened a few hours >>into the build :( But I'll try to reproduce

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Christopher Faylor on 9/14/2005 11:01 AM: > It would be particularly nice if package maintainers would test their packages > with a snapshot. This is particularly important for Cygwin/X. Historically, > we often seem to find about proble

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

Can you duplicate this hang at will or does it take a full run of an OpenOffice build to tickle it? So far (two cases) it hang in different places. It happened a few hours into the build :( But I'll try to reproduce a small testcase tomorrow. I got a third hang in the same spot as the second

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

Funny thing is cppumaker is not a cygwin application, it should not even be listed in the "ps" output above. Non-cygwin apps should be listed in ps if they are started by a cygwin-app. You'd just basically see the cygwin stub in that case. Can you duplicate this hang at will or does it take a

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:06:01PM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote: >>Yes, I have another snapshot to test. >:) > >>Please report success or failure to this thread. Please don't change >>the subject. Please don't start a new discussion. If you have a >>problem please report it using the guidelines

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

Yes, I have another snapshot to test. :) Please report success or failure to this thread. Please don't change the subject. Please don't start a new discussion. If you have a problem please report it using the guidelines from . If you think you've found an er

RE: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

Ok, whatever snapshot this is: "1.5.19s(0.138/4/2) 20050914 20:32:51" Configures, builds, and installs a working wxWidgets here (same wxW's cvs as yesterday). -- Gary R. Van Sickle -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/pr

RE: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

> From: Christopher Faylor > Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 12:01 PM > To: cygwin@cygwin.com; cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com > Subject: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on > the road to 1.5.19 > > Yes, I have another snapshot to test. Sweeet! > I know

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:41:06PM -0500, Brian Ford wrote: >On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>I'm asking, once again, for people to test the latest cygwin snapshot. >>The snapshot that is currently available should be very close to an >>official release of cygwin version 1.5.19. > >

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:19:22PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:58:56AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 06:14:02PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>I'm asking, once again, for people to test the latest cygwin snapshot. > >>The sn

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:26:26PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>I'm asking, once again, for people to test the latest cygwin snapshot. >>The snapshot that is currently available should be very close to an >>official release of cygwin version 1.5.19. >> >>Please repor

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:58:56AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: >On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 06:14:02PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>I'm asking, once again, for people to test the latest cygwin snapshot. >>The snapshot that is currently available should be very close to an >>official rel

A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

Yes, I have another snapshot to test. I know that this is tedious but I thought it would be nice to have some concerted testing of cygwin before I make a new release. I know that in the long run, it will probably only have a limited effect because there are people waiting in the wings who are rel