$ d --version
d v1.2.0
From
info d
we can see that /usr/bin/d is supposed to honour a configuration file
~/.d.conf and that in this file, the boolean variable hidden-files-shown
corresponds to the --hidden-files flag in the d command line.
I have therefore put
hidden-files-shown=true
in
Dave Korn wrote:
On 10 August 2007 17:23, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
* Phil Betts (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:05:18 +0100)
[...]
As a matter of fact I stopped reading his article
after the line where he says d does not read ~/.d.conf because this
matched my own experience.
Bad practice. Stopping read
* Dave Korn (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:37:23 +0100)
> On 10 August 2007 16:22, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
>
>
> > The problem (/my/ problem and maybe Ronald's) is that d reads the home
> > directory from /etc/passwd and not from the environment variable
> > $HOME. In my setup these differ.
>
> Is that ev
On 10 August 2007 16:22, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> The problem (/my/ problem and maybe Ronald's) is that d reads the home
> directory from /etc/passwd and not from the environment variable
> $HOME. In my setup these differ.
Is that even valid? Hmmm. Posix does say:
http://www.opengroup.org/on
On 10 August 2007 14:21, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> * Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:09:11 -0500)
>> Ronald Fischer wrote:
>>> From
>>>
>>>info d
>>>
>>> we can see that /usr/bin/d is supposed to honour a configuration file
>>> ~/.d.conf and that in this file, the boolean variable h
* Dave Korn (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:02:03 +0100)
> On 10 August 2007 14:21, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> > * Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:09:11 -0500)
> >> Ronald Fischer wrote:
> >>> From
> >>>
> >>>info d
> >>>
> >>> we can see that /usr/bin/d is supposed to honour a configuration fil
* Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:09:11 -0500)
> Ronald Fischer wrote:
> > From
> >
> >info d
> >
> > we can see that /usr/bin/d is supposed to honour a configuration file
> > ~/.d.conf and that in this file, the boolean variable hidden-files-shown
> > corresponds to the --hidden-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ronald Fischer wrote:
> From
>
>info d
>
> we can see that /usr/bin/d is supposed to honour a configuration file
> ~/.d.conf and that in this file, the boolean variable hidden-files-shown
> corresponds to the --hidden-files flag in the d comma
* Dave Korn (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:49:31 +0100)
> On 10 August 2007 16:44, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> > Fact is that d under Cygwin ignores ~/.d.conf while under Linux it works
> > as expected.
>
> >> Thorsten, he may or may not know what you're talking about, but your
> >> statement
> >>
>
* Dave Korn (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:19:22 +0100)
> On 10 August 2007 16:09, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> > * Phil Betts (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:04:11 +0100)
> >> Thorsten Kampe wrote on Friday, August 10, 2007 2:21 PM::
>
> >>> These resources don't contradict the info file but state the same.
> >>> Fact is
On 10 August 2007 16:09, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> * Phil Betts (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:04:11 +0100)
>> Thorsten Kampe wrote on Friday, August 10, 2007 2:21 PM::
>>> These resources don't contradict the info file but state the same.
>>> Fact is that d under Cygwin ignores ~/.d.conf while under Linux i
* Phil Betts (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:04:11 +0100)
> Thorsten Kampe wrote on Friday, August 10, 2007 2:21 PM::
> > * Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:09:11 -0500)
> >> Ronald Fischer wrote:
> >>> From
> >>>
> >>>info d
> >>>
> >>> we can see that /usr/bin/d is supposed to honour a confi
Thorsten Kampe wrote on Friday, August 10, 2007 2:21 PM::
> * Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 07:09:11 -0500)
>> Ronald Fischer wrote:
>>> From
>>>
>>>info d
>>>
>>> we can see that /usr/bin/d is supposed to honour a configuration
>>> file ~/.d.conf and that in this file, the boolean
On 10 August 2007 16:44, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> Fact is that d under Cygwin ignores ~/.d.conf while under Linux it works
> as expected.
>> Thorsten, he may or may not know what you're talking about, but your
>> statement
>>
>> "d under Cygwin ignores ~/.d.conf "
>>
>> is demonstra
* Phil Betts (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:05:18 +0100)
> Thorsten Kampe wrote on Friday, August 10, 2007 4:09 PM::
> > Phil, please, you don't know what you're talking about and you don't
> > know what I and Ronald were talking about.
>
> If you re-read what was posted, you'll find I was totally correct
>
On 10 August 2007 17:23, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> * Phil Betts (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:05:18 +0100)
>> Thorsten Kampe wrote on Friday, August 10, 2007 4:09 PM::
>>> Phil, please, you don't know what you're talking about and you don't
>>> know what I and Ronald were talking about.
>>
>> If you re-read
Thorsten Kampe wrote on Friday, August 10, 2007 4:09 PM::
> Phil, please, you don't know what you're talking about and you don't
> know what I and Ronald were talking about.
I'm so sorry, but my telepathy module has a malfunction. Until it's
fixed, I can only respond to what is actually written
* Dave Korn (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:48:13 +0100)
> On 10 August 2007 17:23, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> > * Phil Betts (Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:05:18 +0100)
> >> Thorsten Kampe wrote on Friday, August 10, 2007 4:09 PM::
> >>> Phil, please, you don't know what you're talking about and you don't
> >>> know what
18 matches
Mail list logo
