m and it produces an binary that can be used
from windows on that win32 machine.
So my question to the list: what is the meaning of w64 in the name?
Well, I don't know but I'd really like to know what is the replacement
these days for
gcc -mno-cygwin -mwindows x.c
I tried
i686-w64-m
32. However with a 64 bit windows
>> you can produce win32 applications.
>> However, I just tried to use i686-w64-mingw32-g++ on my win32 machine
>> with a hello world program and it produces an binary that can be used
>> from windows on that win32 machine.
>> So my
win32 machine.
So my question to the list: what is the meaning of w64 in the name?
Well, I don't know but I'd really like to know what is the replacement
these days for
gcc -mno-cygwin -mwindows x.c
I tried
i686-w64-mingw32-gcc -mwindows -m32 x.c
but get
x.c:35:13: error: ex
running on a 32 bit windows, it is
not possible to cross compile to win32. However with a 64 bit windows
you can produce win32 applications.
However, I just tried to use i686-w64-mingw32-g++ on my win32 machine
with a hello world program and it produces an binary that can be used
from windows on
Am 17.12.2010 15:56, schrieb Rance Hall:
> Over the last several days I've been reading the thread that
> eventually migrated to a discussion of combining rebase and perlrebase
> as one.
>
> I've largely ignored it because I have never had a problem with cygwin
> that wasn't my fault.
>
> It seem
Over the last several days I've been reading the thread that
eventually migrated to a discussion of combining rebase and perlrebase
as one.
I've largely ignored it because I have never had a problem with cygwin
that wasn't my fault.
It seems more and more this rebase deal is coming up and I'm sta
On 12/16/2010 7:55 AM, NightStrike wrote:
> 2010/12/16 Frédéric Bron <...>:
>>> I checked the Make file, it used this flag:
>>> gcc -mno-cygwin -g -Wl,--add-stdcall-alias -Wl,--export-all-symbols ...
>>
>> replace gcc by gcc-3
>> gcc 4 is now the default on cygwin but the cross compiler is not
>> s
2010/12/16 Frédéric Bron :
>> I checked the Make file, it used this flag:
>> gcc -mno-cygwin -g -Wl,--add-stdcall-alias -Wl,--export-all-symbols ...
>
> replace gcc by gcc-3
> gcc 4 is now the default on cygwin but the cross compiler is not
> supported for that version.
> Frédéric
What do you mean
> I checked the Make file, it used this flag:
> gcc -mno-cygwin -g -Wl,--add-stdcall-alias -Wl,--export-all-symbols ...
replace gcc by gcc-3
gcc 4 is now the default on cygwin but the cross compiler is not
supported for that version.
Frédéric
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.h
>
> make JAVA_HOME="C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.5.0_22"
>
> or
>
> JAVA_HOME="C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.5.0_22"
> export JAVA_HOME
> make
correction:
JAVA_HOME='C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.5.0_22'
JAVA_HOME=`cygpath -m ${JAVA_HOME}`
export JAVA_HOME
make CC=x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc
--
Chiheng
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 6:03 AM, gviewer wrote:
>
> Yes, That problem got solved. But now I got a new problem:
> "fatal error, jni.h, no such file or directory"
>
> The jni.h is included in a .h c file.
>
> What's going on?
>
>
make JAVA_HOME="C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.5.0_22"
or
JAVA_HOME="C:
t; Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/mingw-targeted-cross-compiler-question-tp30467239p30468379.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Problem reports:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:10 PM, gviewer wrote:
>
> Thanks for explanation. I checked the Make file, and here it is:
>
> CFLAGS = -O3 -Wimplicit
> ...
> gcc -mno-cygwin -g -Wl,--add-stdcall-alias -Wl,--export-all-symbols
> ${BRILL_INCLUDES} -I ${JAVA_HOME}/include/ -I ${JAVA_HOME}/include/win32
>
em reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:50 PM, gviewer wrote:
>
> My cygwin may already install that package, then how to modify the flag in
> Makefile to compile.
That depends on the makefile. Usually, there's a user-settable
variable called CFLAGS that you can use to customize things. But
basically, with t
http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/mingw-targeted-
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:41 PM, gviewer wrote:
>
> Hello, I downloaded a software and tried to compile it on cygwin, I got an
> error message:
>
> "gcc: The -mno-cygwin flag has been removed; use a mingw-targeted
> cross-compiler."
>
> I checked the Make file, it used this flag:
> gcc -mno-cygwin
...
What should I use exactly to replace the '-mno-cygwin' flag? Thanks a lot.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/mingw-targeted-cross-compiler-question-tp30467239p30467239.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Problem reports:
cannot create regular file `/home/Vincent/.inputrc': No such file
>> or direry
>> bash: cd: /home/Vincent: No such file or directory
>
> Then you don't have permissions to write to that folder.
>
>> It means I usually have to run my application using administ
On 2010-09-16 Saxon, Will wrote:
I am trying to copy files from a Linux machine to Windows using rsync. I am
using rsync 3.0.7 and cygwin 1.7.5.
The source files on the linux machine are all owned by root:root with mode
0755. When I copy them with the following command:
rsync -clrtv -
usually have to run my application using administrator
>> rights but I don't like to do this.
>> Cygwin seems to allow user to create folder inside its installation
>> path so I would like to know how it's possible.
>
>Sorry my, is this question regarding Cygwin, o
No such file or directory
Then you don't have permissions to write to that folder.
> It means I usually have to run my application using administrator
> rights but I don't like to do this.
> Cygwin seems to allow user to create folder inside its installation
> path so I
>> wrote:
>> > Greetings, Marco Atzeri!
>> >
>> >> run setup and choose the directory you want
>> >
>> >> the default proposal is c:\cygwin
>> >
>> > To add:
>> > Strongly advised against paths with spaces or national
>> letters.
>> >
>>
>> Again I was not very clear I don't want to know how to
>>
--- Dom 28/11/10, Vincent Richomme ha scritto:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 01:07:44 +0300,
> Andrey Repin
>
> wrote:
> > Greetings, Marco Atzeri!
> >
> >> run setup and choose the directory you want
> >
> >> the default proposal is c:\cygwin
> >
> > To add:
> > Strongly advised against paths with s
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 01:07:44 +0300, Andrey Repin
wrote:
> Greetings, Marco Atzeri!
>
>> run setup and choose the directory you want
>
>> the default proposal is c:\cygwin
>
> To add:
> Strongly advised against paths with spaces or national letters.
>
Again I was not very clear I don't want to
Greetings, Marco Atzeri!
> run setup and choose the directory you want
> the default proposal is c:\cygwin
To add:
Strongly advised against paths with spaces or national letters.
--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdae...@freemail.ru) 28.11.2010, <1:06>
Sorry for my terrible english...
--
Problem rep
--- Sab 27/11/10, Vincent Richomme ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> First I am sorry to ask this question but I would like to
> know if some cygwin developers
> could give me some advice about the way of installing a
> software at the root drive
> (ex c:\mysoftware) on Windows Vist
Hi,
First I am sorry to ask this question but I would like to know if some
cygwin developers
could give me some advice about the way of installing a software at
the root drive
(ex c:\mysoftware) on Windows Vista/7 operating systems.
Indeed normally on those systems application are installed
Hello,
I am trying to run gvim via Cygwin using run.exe and a shell script. The reason
I am doing this is so that I can assign the command to a button vs. opening
gvim from a shell.
My script works, but if I do run it from a command window it generates a stack
dump:
Exception: STATUS_GUARD_PA
2010/9/16 Saxon, Will :
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to copy files from a Linux machine to Windows using rsync. I am
> using rsync 3.0.7 and cygwin 1.7.5.
>
> The source files on the linux machine are all owned by root:root with mode
> 0755. When I copy them with the following command:
>
> rsy
Hello,
I am trying to copy files from a Linux machine to Windows using rsync. I am
using rsync 3.0.7 and cygwin 1.7.5.
The source files on the linux machine are all owned by root:root with mode
0755. When I copy them with the following command:
rsync -clrtv --chmod=ugo=rwX rsync://@lin
On 12.09.2010 08:51, Ilya Basin wrote:
AK> On 11 September 2010 18:48, Ilya Basin wrote:
AK> On Saturday, September 11, 2010, Ilya Basin wrote:
Hi. My default LANG is C.UTF-8. If I change it to ru.UTF-8, all
non-ascii characters in man pages are displayed as question
AK> On 11 September 2010 18:48, Ilya Basin wrote:
>> AK> On Saturday, September 11, 2010, Ilya Basin wrote:
>>>> Hi. My default LANG is C.UTF-8. If I change it to ru.UTF-8, all
>>>> non-ascii characters in man pages are displayed as question marks.
>>
&g
AK> On Saturday, September 11, 2010, Ilya Basin wrote:
>> Hi. My default LANG is C.UTF-8. If I change it to ru.UTF-8, all
>> non-ascii characters in man pages are displayed as question marks.
AK> ru.UTF-8 isn't a valid locale setting; you need a territory in there
AK>
On Saturday, September 11, 2010, Ilya Basin wrote:
> Hi. My default LANG is C.UTF-8. If I change it to ru.UTF-8, all
> non-ascii characters in man pages are displayed as question marks.
ru.UTF-8 isn't a valid locale setting; you need a territory in there
as well, e.g. ru_RU.UTF-8, ot
Hi. My default LANG is C.UTF-8. If I change it to ru.UTF-8, all
non-ascii characters in man pages are displayed as question marks.
I found that on Linux before going to nroff, the unzipped man page is
first piped through /usr/bin/preconv that escapes non-ascii chars:
vim \- Vi IMproved
(\[u0423
On 9/8/2010 7:32 AM, mike marchywka wrote:
On 9/8/10, Corinna Vinschen<> wrote:
On Sep 7 09:00, mike marchywka wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to copy of bunch of files from debian over to windoze using scp
-r.
This was working fine except for one error where it complains foo is
not a directory
and app
On 9/8/10, Corinna Vinschen <> wrote:
> On Sep 7 09:00, mike marchywka wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'm trying to copy of bunch of files from debian over to windoze using scp
>> -r.
>> This was working fine except for one error where it complains foo is
>> not a directory
>> and apparently I have foo and foo.
On Sep 7 09:00, mike marchywka wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to copy of bunch of files from debian over to windoze using scp -r.
> This was working fine except for one error where it complains foo is
> not a directory
> and apparently I have foo and foo.exe in one dir but foo is a directory.
This is
Hi,
I'm trying to copy of bunch of files from debian over to windoze using scp -r.
This was working fine except for one error where it complains foo is
not a directory
and apparently I have foo and foo.exe in one dir but foo is a directory.
I think this replicates the problem. It seems that ".exe"
Thanks again for thinking about this Steven,
I was able to get it working by going into services on windows and
changing the Log On option for rsync from "Local System account" to
"This account" and entering my logon and password there.
Dan
On 9/4/2010 10:48 AM, Steven Monai wrote:
On 2010/
Hi Steven,
Thanks for taking the time to think about this. You are correct the
rsync daemon is running locally, and the network share is mounted
locally, my thought (which as you say could be entirely wrong) was that
the local rsync daemon doesn't seem to have the correct permissions to
modif
On 2010/09/04 9:30 AM, Dan Miller wrote:
> I'm running windows XP
> Cygwin with latest updates
>
> I have a bash script that sets up a directory structure for rsync to
> perform incremental backups. It all works fine locally.
>
> I'd like to use the same approach to backup my local files to a win
I'm running windows XP
Cygwin with latest updates
I have a bash script that sets up a directory structure for rsync to
perform incremental backups. It all works fine locally.
I'd like to use the same approach to backup my local files to a windows
network share on a server.
I have the window
On 2010-08-30 20:31, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/30/2010 11:27 AM, Oleksandr Gavenko wrote:
$ /bin/test -d && echo ok
ok
$ /bin/test -d '' && echo ok || echo must_be_error
must_be_error
Both of these results match POSIX. Remember, POSIX describes different
behaviors for one argument than for two a
On 08/30/2010 11:27 AM, Oleksandr Gavenko wrote:
$ /bin/test -d && echo ok
ok
$ /bin/test -d '' && echo ok || echo must_be_error
must_be_error
Both of these results match POSIX. Remember, POSIX describes different
behaviors for one argument than for two arguments (for the one-argument
case
$ /bin/test -d && echo ok
ok
$ /bin/test -d '' && echo ok || echo must_be_error
must_be_error
POSIX require argument for -d, so behavior implementation
depend.
I can not check another 'test' implementation now.
For me get error is more convenient,
because this not break this code if $dir no
-Original Message-
>From: cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com [mailto:cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com] On
Behalf Of >denise
>Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 12:17 AM
>To: cygwin@cygwin.com
>Subject: dvd has korean file names that are now question marks
>
>hi,
>im not a programmer, i k
hi,
im not a programmer, i know very little MSDOS, i know windows xp well.
i have some dvds that i used to back up some files but unfortunately
all the files with korean names were then changed as the disk was
burned. so now they are all question marks (bad file naming according
to windows) so i
cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com wrote on 07/30/2010 04:43:46 PM:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 13:55 -0500, Ernest Mueller wrote:
> > We are trying to launch some Java apps from within Cygwin. The problem
> > we're having is that then Java file IO operations want to use Windows
paths
> > and use \ as the defaul
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 13:55 -0500, Ernest Mueller wrote:
> We are trying to launch some Java apps from within Cygwin. The problem
> we're having is that then Java file IO operations want to use Windows paths
> and use \ as the default path separator. (This is different from classpath
> problems o
On 7/30/2010 2:55 PM, Ernest Mueller wrote:
>
> We are trying to launch some Java apps from within Cygwin. The problem
> we're having is that then Java file IO operations want to use Windows paths
> and use \ as the default path separator. (This is different from classpath
> problems or using cy
On 7/30/2010 2:16 PM, Ernest Mueller wrote:
> Am trying to use Java file.io without shelling out all the time. To use
> cygpath you basically have to spawn shells to do any IO commands, which is
> not a best practice.
http://www.cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR :-)
With that out of the way, wh
Subject:Re: Question on Java and Cygwin
On 7/30/2010 1:55 PM, Ernest Mueller wrote:
>
> We are trying to launch some Java apps from within Cygwin. The problem
> we're having is that then Java file IO operations want to use Windows paths
> and use \ as the default path separator. (This is different from classpath
> problems or using cy
We are trying to launch some Java apps from within Cygwin. The problem
we're having is that then Java file IO operations want to use Windows paths
and use \ as the default path separator. (This is different from classpath
problems or using cygpath to convert stuff you're passing in on the comman
On 07/22/2010 06:09 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 21/07/2010 22:54, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Is there any sane reason that:
>>
>> gcc -E -dD -o - foo.c
>>
>> generates ./-.exe on cygwin, rather than outputting to stdout like on
>> every other platform? This tripped up an autoconf test. Fortunately,
>> re
On 21/07/2010 22:54, Eric Blake wrote:
> Is there any sane reason that:
>
> gcc -E -dD -o - foo.c
>
> generates ./-.exe on cygwin, rather than outputting to stdout like on
> every other platform? This tripped up an autoconf test. Fortunately,
> removing '-o -' appears to be portable.
I've se
Is there any sane reason that:
gcc -E -dD -o - foo.c
generates ./-.exe on cygwin, rather than outputting to stdout like on
every other platform? This tripped up an autoconf test. Fortunately,
removing '-o -' appears to be portable.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682
Libvirt
Please don't #http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU
On Jul 21 14:06, Adi B Treiner wrote:
> Hello Pierre,
>
> sorry for the delay. I determined your post only now.
>
> I performed 'rebaseall' but it seems not to solve the issue.
> I still get same error message.
>
> 203950 [main] cron 2808 C:\cyg
Hello Pierre,
sorry for the delay. I determined your post only now.
I performed 'rebaseall' but it seems not to solve the issue.
I still get same error message.
203950 [main] cron 2808 C:\cygwin\usr\sbin\cron.exe: *** fatal error -
could not load user32, Win32 error 1114
thanks in advance, Adi
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 03:34:20PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
>Eric Blake wrote:
>>> Isn't this inconsistent? Any plans to fix this?
>---
>Given the difficulting in building the cygin executable, I doubt it.
>
>Most projects, I get the tarball, or check it out. Do a configure, or
>run the bootstra
Eric Blake wrote:
Isn't this inconsistent? Any plans to fix this?
---
Given the difficulting in building the cygin
executable, I doubt it.
Most projects, I get the tarball, or check it out.
Do a configure, or run the bootstrap.sh/autogen.sh script, then configure,
then make --
alias for
backslash, then submit a patch - but as I don't use user names in file
name contexts, it doesn't bother me enough for me to want to write a
patch. So, the question is back at you - any plans for you to submit a
patch to fix this?
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com
Consistent with unix names, where we use forward slash
instead of backslash (both in file and registry names),
why do I get an error when I try to use /user as
a user arg when \\user is allows? Should I get a
warning about using a Windows style identifier by using
backslash? I mean there's be
gt; An: xxx...@xx.xxx
>> Betreff: [bulk] - Re: Question on setup.exe
>>
>> On 6/14/2010 9:20 AM, DEWI - N. Zacharias wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> assume I had a cygwin installation on one computer with the local package
>> directory
On 6/14/2010 9:20 AM, DEWI - N. Zacharias wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> assume I had a cygwin installation on one computer with the local package
> directory located in c:\mylocalpackage.
>
> Is it possible to copy this directory to a other computer and use the -L
> flag (local install) to instal
On 14.06.2010 17:20, DEWI - N. Zacharias wrote:
Hi there,
assume I had a cygwin installation on one computer with the local package
directory located in c:\mylocalpackage.
Is it possible to copy this directory to a other computer and use the -L flag
(local install) to install a identical c
Hi there,
assume I had a cygwin installation on one computer with the local package
directory located in c:\mylocalpackage.
Is it possible to copy this directory to a other computer and use the -L flag
(local install) to install a identical copy of my Cygwin installation without
access to
- Original Message -
From: "Adi B Treiner"
To: Cygwin
Cc: Pierre.Humblet
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 10:43
Hello Pierre,
thanks fort the response.
> Did you upgrade from 1.5 to 1.7.5 or did you go through some 1.7.X?
I think I upgraded from 1.5 to 1.7.5 directly.
> This problem may
Hello Pierre,
thanks fort the response.
> Did you upgrade from 1.5 to 1.7.5 or did you go through some 1.7.X?
I think I upgraded from 1.5 to 1.7.5 directly.
> This problem may be due to the way the groups are computed in Cygwin
> 1.7 but there must be something special about your install, oth
At 08:57 AM 6/3/2010, Adi B Treiner wrote:
Hello,
After upgrading to version 1.7.5 running cron tasks for normal local
users doesnt work anymore.
For those users cron always reports the following error:
cron.exe: *** fatal error - could not load user32, Win32 error 1114
This seems to be relate
-Original Message-
> From: cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com [mailto:cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com] On Behalf Of
> Eric Blake
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 2:51 PM
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: bash - command - PATH question
>
> On 05/19/2010 01:42 PM, Rockefeller, Ha
g on the first invocation being from ~. That way, bash will hash
the absolute name in the first place.
At which point, this is no longer a cygwin-specific question - you would
get the same behavior on Linux.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library ht
On 05/19/2010 12:45 PM, Rockefeller, Harry wrote:
> After more testing, where
>
> "export PATH=$PATH:~/bin" only exists in .bash_login.
>
> If I run 'foo' from my login directory it works.
> If I then cd to a different place I get the error
>
> bash: ./bin/foo: No such file or directory
Eric B
[please don't top-post]
On 05/19/2010 12:45 PM, Rockefeller, Harry wrote:
> After more testing, where
>
> "export PATH=$PATH:~/bin" only exists in .bash_login.
>
> If I run 'foo' from my login directory it works.
> If I then cd to a different place I get the error
>
> bash: ./bin/foo: No such f
m] On Behalf Of
Rockefeller, Harry
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 11:22 AM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: RE: bash - command - PATH question
I double and triple checked for DOS things \r, ^M, etc.
I use emacs to edit and so it's pretty clear about DOS things.
Anyway, I ran od -c on files and
gwin.com] On Behalf Of
Rockefeller, Harry
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 10:38 AM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: RE: bash - command - PATH question
I found that if I give the simple 'bash' command to create a new
shell then type 'foo' it does work.
[quote on]
-Original Messa
On 5/19/2010 10:37 AM, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> On 05/19/2010 08:31 AM, Rockefeller, Harry wrote:
>>> Again, have you tried dos2unix foo?
>> Yes this didn't help.
> That's funny because this is the usual cause. Are you sure there is no
> extra carriage return line endings. I usually check by going i
On 5/19/2010 10:16 AM, Rockefeller, Harry wrote:
>> On 5/19/2010 8:50 AM, Rockefeller, Harry wrote:
>>> Given that 'foo' is a bash script, why is it that:
>>>
>>> $ foo
>>>
>>> returns the error:
>>>
>>> bash: ./bin/foo: No such file or directory
>
>> What happens when you directly run ./bin/foo?
o: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: bash - command - PATH question
Again, have you tried dos2unix foo?
On 05/19/2010 08:16 AM, Rockefeller, Harry wrote:
>> On 5/19/2010 8:50 AM, Rockefeller, Harry wrote:
>>
>>> Given that 'foo' is a bash script, why is it that:
&g
On 05/19/2010 08:31 AM, Rockefeller, Harry wrote:
Again, have you tried dos2unix foo?
Yes this didn't help.
That's funny because this is the usual cause. Are you sure there is no
extra carriage return line endings. I usually check by going into vim
and seeing if it says [DOS} at the bottom (
> Again, have you tried dos2unix foo?
Yes this didn't help.
[snip]
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Again, have you tried dos2unix foo?
On 05/19/2010 08:16 AM, Rockefeller, Harry wrote:
On 5/19/2010 8:50 AM, Rockefeller, Harry wrote:
Given that 'foo' is a bash script, why is it that:
$ foo
returns the error:
bash: ./bin/foo: No such file or directory
What happens when yo
> On 5/19/2010 8:50 AM, Rockefeller, Harry wrote:
> > Given that 'foo' is a bash script, why is it that:
> >
> > $ foo
> >
> > returns the error:
> >
> > bash: ./bin/foo: No such file or directory
> What happens when you directly run ./bin/foo?
I get exactly the same error. The error is cor
On 05/19/2010 06:50 AM, Rockefeller, Harry wrote:
Given that 'foo' is a bash script, why is it that:
$ foo
returns the error:
bash: ./bin/foo: No such file or directory
BUT since foo is *really in* PATH, e.g.,
$ `which foo`
runs correctly?
Usually this means that foo is in "DOS" mode and co
On 5/19/2010 8:50 AM, Rockefeller, Harry wrote:
> Given that 'foo' is a bash script, why is it that:
>
> $ foo
>
> returns the error:
>
> bash: ./bin/foo: No such file or directory
What happens when you directly run ./bin/foo? What is the shebang
(first line) of foo?
> BUT since foo is *real
Given that 'foo' is a bash script, why is it that:
$ foo
returns the error:
bash: ./bin/foo: No such file or directory
BUT since foo is *really in* PATH, e.g.,
$ `which foo`
runs correctly?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/fa
On 03/26/2010 07:02 AM, mike marchywka wrote:
> Apparently it had some problems with the 1.5 links,
> I deleted those and that was ok- should links be compatible?
1.7 can read symlinks created by 1.5, although if the 1.5 link contained
filenames with 8-bit characters, it might not do what you wan
In the last episode of this saga, I was trying to build
QtWebkit without using the cygwin package and using
1.5. Having been illuminated about how stupid this was,
I installed 1.7 and 1.7 and 1.5 do seem to coexist.
I opened a 1.7 windoh and started to rebuild the project.
Apparently it had some p
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> On 3/17/2010 3:33 PM, Gregg Levine wrote:
>>
>> Hello!
>> I see an appropriate amount of traffic concerning these snapshots. And
>> I know that the rest of the group is largely appreciative of them.
>> This is all well and good, except
On 3/17/2010 3:33 PM, Gregg Levine wrote:
Hello!
I see an appropriate amount of traffic concerning these snapshots. And
I know that the rest of the group is largely appreciative of them.
This is all well and good, except when I looked at the pages for them
I did not see any instructions for use.
Hello!
I see an appropriate amount of traffic concerning these snapshots. And
I know that the rest of the group is largely appreciative of them.
This is all well and good, except when I looked at the pages for them
I did not see any instructions for use. Do I just grab the relevant
one from the sit
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Jeremy Bopp wrote:
> On 3/16/2010 2:44 PM, Gregg Levine wrote:
>> Hello!
>> Where would I find out what the version of LibUSB that is supplied with
>> Cygwin?
>
> http://cygwin.com/packages/
>
> -Jeremy
Hello!
An excellent response. Thank you Jeremy. However it d
On 3/16/2010 2:44 PM, Gregg Levine wrote:
> Hello!
> Where would I find out what the version of LibUSB that is supplied with
> Cygwin?
http://cygwin.com/packages/
-Jeremy
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:
Hello!
Where would I find out what the version of LibUSB that is supplied with Cygwin?
-
Gregg C Levine gregg.drw...@gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Docume
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 12:02:52AM -0500, Paul McFerrin wrote:
>I discovered a read-only filesystem called /proc/mounts which is
>symbolically linked from /etc/mtab.
>
>My question is: who populates this data??
I'm going with magical Cygwin elves who look vaguely like hippos.
I discovered a read-only filesystem called /proc/mounts which is
symbolically linked from /etc/mtab.
My question is: who populates this data??
I got a cyclic-loop caused by drive C being mounted twice. as /c and
/cygdrive/c I would like to get rid of the cygdrive one but it is
special
On 27/02/2010 18:19, Vincent Richomme wrote:
> $ gcc test.c
> gcc.exe: CreateProcess: No such file or directory
>
> If instead of putting gcc files inside a usr folder I put it directly the
> archive root it works fine.
Add '-v' to see how gcc is using relative paths to look for cc1.exe (and
p
I have a last question that might reminds you something (at least I hope
so)
and unfortunately that is beyond this mailing list but I chance it
I am working on a msys/mingw installer(EasyMingw) where instead of the
default crappy
toolchain(very personal opinion I encourage you to make yours) I am
601 - 700 of 2378 matches
Mail list logo
