Re: bash problem after restarting computer (cygwin 1.7.17-1)

2013-01-02 Thread Sean Murphy
New James Bond movie: You Only Reboot Twice. -Sean P Murphy On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Ryan Johnson wrote: > On 02/01/2013 11:24 AM, Aaron Schneider wrote: >> >> On 02/01/2013 19:21, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> >>> But most likely you need to run rebaseall. >> >> >> It was solved with ju

Re: bash problem after restarting computer (cygwin 1.7.17-1)

2013-01-02 Thread Ryan Johnson
On 02/01/2013 11:24 AM, Aaron Schneider wrote: On 02/01/2013 19:21, Christopher Faylor wrote: But most likely you need to run rebaseall. It was solved with just restarting the computer. The Windows motto: "when in doubt, reboot" FYI, it may be that you just hit a mintty session that had a p

Re: bash problem after restarting computer (cygwin 1.7.17-1)

2013-01-02 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 07:24:09PM +0100, Aaron Schneider wrote: >On 02/01/2013 19:21, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> But most likely you need to run rebaseall. > >It was solved with just restarting the computer. So, the lesson learned is that you always have to restart your computer twice. -- Prob

Re: bash problem after restarting computer (cygwin 1.7.17-1)

2013-01-02 Thread Aaron Schneider
On 02/01/2013 19:21, Christopher Faylor wrote: But most likely you need to run rebaseall. It was solved with just restarting the computer. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html

Re: bash problem after restarting computer (cygwin 1.7.17-1)

2013-01-02 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 07:17:32PM +0100, Aaron Schneider wrote: >-bash: fork: retry: Resource temporarily unavailable > 0 [main] bash 8080 child_info_fork::abort: >C:\cygwin\bin\cyggcc_s-1.dll: Loaded to different address: >parent(0x3D) != child(0x3E) >-bash: fork: retry: Resource

Re: Bash problem

2009-04-30 Thread Mark J. Reed
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Ken Brown > A build script I was running failed because it had a command of > the form > 'eval foo=bar time '. That won't work because time is a special shell keyword, and as such only recognized when it's the first word on the command line. The same is true of al

Re: Bash problem

2009-04-30 Thread Ken Brown
On 4/30/2009 7:56 AM, Eric Blake wrote: time is a special case. It is BOTH a bash reserved word and an external command (assuming you've installed the external package). The difference is what syntax you use. Thanks for the explanation. My problem, obviously, is that I hadn't installed the

Re: Bash problem

2009-04-30 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Ken Brown on 4/30/2009 5:27 AM: > A build script I was running failed because it had a command of the form > 'eval foo=bar time '. Here's a simple test case: This is not cygwin specific. > > $ eval foo=bar time true > -bash: time: comm

Re: Bash problem

2009-04-30 Thread david sastre
2009/4/30 Ken Brown : > A build script I was running failed because it had a command of the form > 'eval foo=bar time '.  Here's a simple test case: > > $ eval foo=bar time true > -bash: time: command not found > > It works fine without foo=bar: > > $ eval time true > > real    0m0.060s > user    0

Re: Bash problem - v3.1.17(8) - syntax error

2006-09-26 Thread mwoehlke
Arun Biyani wrote: I just upgraded to the current bash. Now I am getting an error. I reinstalled, rebooted the machine. Still get the same error. The variable $HOME is set correctly. > bash: /c/home/abiyani/.bash_login: line 7: syntax error: unexpected end of file > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~

Re: [Fwd: Re: Bash problem - v3.1.17(8) - syntax error]

2006-09-26 Thread Arun Biyani
Igor Peshansky wrote: Is there any particular reason you post the output of od on .bashrc when the error was reported in .bash_login? BTW, for the future, you might want to run "od -c" instead -- its output is a bit more readable. Igor Igor & Dave, Thx. It is a CR/LF problem. I had

Re: [Fwd: Re: Bash problem - v3.1.17(8) - syntax error]

2006-09-26 Thread Igor Peshansky
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Arun Biyani wrote: > Original Message > Subject: Re: Bash problem - v3.1.17(8) - syntax error > Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:17:34 -0700 > From: Arun Biyani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

[Fwd: Re: Bash problem - v3.1.17(8) - syntax error]

2006-09-26 Thread Arun Biyani
Original Message Subject:Re: Bash problem - v3.1.17(8) - syntax error Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:17:34 -0700 From: Arun Biyani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dave Korn wrote: On 26

RE: Bash problem - v3.1.17(8) - syntax error

2006-09-26 Thread Dave Korn
On 26 September 2006 20:11, Arun Biyani wrote: > I just upgraded to the current bash. Now I am getting an error. I > reinstalled, rebooted > the machine. Still get the same error. The variable $HOME is set correctly. Wrong line-ends most likely. Run d2u on it. cheers, DaveK -- Can'

Re: Bash problem

2002-11-06 Thread jblazi
thank you all. There was an incredible reason for the problem: ActiveTcl manipulated the TEXPATH variable and .exe was not reckognized eny more. Even when I reinstalled Tcl, their uninstaller did not restore this variable. After I restored the variable, everything worked again. So this was not a

RE: Bash problem

2002-11-06 Thread Harig, Mark A.
As requested at http://cygwin.com/bugs.html: o Please describe how to reproduce the problem, including a test case, if possible. o Please include at least the version number of the Cygwin release you are using along with the operating system name and its version number, for example, "cy

Re: Bash problem

2002-11-06 Thread Randall R Schulz
Janos, A hint about how to diagnose this problem is to open a CMD.exe window an enter the command to launch BASH there so you can see the diagnostics (instead of having them displayed in a window that vanishes immediately). If you have not modified the shortcut that Cygwin Setup adds to the Pr

Re: Bash problem

2002-11-06 Thread Randall R Schulz
Janos, A very general hint is that installing one or both of those other applications changed your system's PATH environment variable in a way that's causing some of BASH's start-up processing to fail. Possibly the BASH startup processing is invoking a program or script whose name is that of a