Eric Blake wrote:
>>I'd like to ask people to test the latest snapshot as of today. It contains
>>two patches, one of them with some impact on how timestamps are used.
>>
>>The first patch is less important, it should just stop floppy access when
>>sync is called on Win2K boxes.
>>
>>
>
>Does
Floppy access stopped. Thanks!
"Corinna Vinschen " wrote:
> The first patch is less important, it should just stop floppy access
> when sync is called on Win2K boxes.
--
Ken Shaffer
- - - - - - - Appended by Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. - - - - - - -
This e-mail and any attachments may
On Apr 12 23:22, Eric Blake wrote:
> The second patch caused a regression in the coreutils test suite:
>
> $ touch -c none
> touch: setting times of `none': Permission denied
Thanks for the report. That will be fixed in the next snapshot/release.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
Hi All...
It looks good on 98 and 2k. cvs and ssh were used on both machines with no
problems.
Thanks,
...Karl
From: Corinna VinschenSubject: Please test 2005-Apr-12 snapshot
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:33:03 +0200
I'd like to ask people to test the latest snapshot as of today. It
contains
two p
> I'd like to ask people to test the latest snapshot as of today. It contains
> two patches, one of them with some impact on how timestamps are used.
>
> The first patch is less important, it should just stop floppy access when
> sync is called on Win2K boxes.
Doesn't seem to be any problem with
5 matches
Mail list logo