Re: Please test 2005-Apr-12 snapshot

2005-04-13 Thread 103571.1247
Eric Blake wrote: >>I'd like to ask people to test the latest snapshot as of today. It contains >>two patches, one of them with some impact on how timestamps are used. >> >>The first patch is less important, it should just stop floppy access when >>sync is called on Win2K boxes. >> >> > >Does

Re: Please test 2005-Apr-12 snapshot

2005-04-13 Thread Shaffer, Kenneth
Floppy access stopped. Thanks! "Corinna Vinschen " wrote: > The first patch is less important, it should just stop floppy access > when sync is called on Win2K boxes. -- Ken Shaffer - - - - - - - Appended by Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. - - - - - - - This e-mail and any attachments may

Re: Please test 2005-Apr-12 snapshot

2005-04-13 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 12 23:22, Eric Blake wrote: > The second patch caused a regression in the coreutils test suite: > > $ touch -c none > touch: setting times of `none': Permission denied Thanks for the report. That will be fixed in the next snapshot/release. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen

RE: Please test 2005-Apr-12 snapshot

2005-04-12 Thread Karl M
Hi All... It looks good on 98 and 2k. cvs and ssh were used on both machines with no problems. Thanks, ...Karl From: Corinna VinschenSubject: Please test 2005-Apr-12 snapshot Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:33:03 +0200 I'd like to ask people to test the latest snapshot as of today. It contains two p

Re: Please test 2005-Apr-12 snapshot

2005-04-12 Thread Eric Blake
> I'd like to ask people to test the latest snapshot as of today. It contains > two patches, one of them with some impact on how timestamps are used. > > The first patch is less important, it should just stop floppy access when > sync is called on Win2K boxes. Doesn't seem to be any problem with