-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Dave Korn on 4/28/2005 12:41 PM:
Heh, actually we probably have to talk about that. The k should IIUIC be
swallowed by the %lf and the %c should fail; this is the production
described as NAN(n-char-sequence opt) in the C language
Original Message
From: Jean-Christophe Kablitz
Sent: 27 April 2005 00:22
Hello,
I have noticed, that, while parsing {a float_value immediately followed by
'n' or 'N'} with the %f%c format, the sscanf function of cygwin-1.5.16-1
behaves differently from the scanf function of
Hi Dave,
Thanks for looking into this. Your patch wasn't quite correct. It ended up
breaking nan-support which isn't tested in the accompanying testcase. It needed
to verify that x multiple_flags_ored_together == multiple_flags_ored_together.
Anyway, I have checked a patch in and
Original Message
From: Jeff Johnston
Sent: 28 April 2005 19:33
Hi Dave,
Thanks for looking into this. Your patch wasn't quite correct. It
ended up breaking nan-support which isn't tested in the accompanying
testcase. It needed to verify that x multiple_flags_ored_together ==
Heh, actually we probably have to talk about that. The k
should IIUIC be swallowed by the %lf and the %c should fail;
this is the production described as NAN(n-char-sequence opt)
in the C language spec, strtod documentation (that's
7.20.1.3.3 in WG14/N843 draft, I don't have the final
Original Message
From: Jean-Christophe Kablitz
Sent: 27 April 2005 00:22
Maybe I have been misusing sscanf. Or there is a relationship with the
NaN-parsing problem of the newlib.
Best regards.
Jean-Christophe K.
Almost certainly so; thanks for the test case, I'll get onto it
-
From: Jeff Johnston jjohnstn at redhat dot com
To: Dave Korn dave dot korn at artimi dot com
Cc: cygwin at cygwin dot com; newlib at sources dot redhat dot com
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 8:47 PM
Subject: Re: RFC: Fix partial NaN-parsing problem [was RE: sscanf problem]
Patch checked in. Thanks
Patch checked in. Thanks.
-- Jeff J.
Dave Korn wrote:
Original Message
From: Dave Korn
Sent: 04 April 2005 19:07
Original Message
From: Dave Korn
Sent: 04 April 2005 18:51
Original Message
From: Michael Hines
Sent: 04 April 2005 19:43
The following program prints
i=1
Original Message
From: Dave Korn
Sent: 04 April 2005 19:07
Original Message
From: Dave Korn
Sent: 04 April 2005 18:51
Original Message
From: Michael Hines
Sent: 04 April 2005 19:43
The following program prints
i=1 x=0
instead of
i=0 x=10
when using the
9 matches
Mail list logo
