On Aug 2 09:56, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> On Aug 1 10:29, Brian Inglis via Cygwin wrote:
> > On 2023-07-31 15:12, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> > > Hi Bruno,
> > >
> > > On Jul 31 20:43, Bruno Haible via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > > there are more of
On Aug 1 10:29, Brian Inglis via Cygwin wrote:
> On 2023-07-31 15:12, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> > Hi Bruno,
> >
> > On Jul 31 20:43, Bruno Haible via Cygwin wrote:
> > > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > there are more of those expressions which are disabled on glibc and
> > > > fail on
On 2023-07-31 15:12, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
Hi Bruno,
On Jul 31 20:43, Bruno Haible via Cygwin wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
there are more of those expressions which are disabled on glibc and
fail on Cygwin, for instance in test-c32iscntrl.c. Maybe it's actually
the better idea
Brian Inglis wrote:
> It seems to me that most application developers needing to support
> non-Western-European languages might want a non-POSIX interpretation of
> digits.
Sure. GNU libunistring has dedicated API for this:
-
https://www.gnu.org/software/libunistring/manual/html_node/Object-o
On 2023-07-31 12:43, Bruno Haible via Cygwin wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
there are more of those expressions which are disabled on glibc and
fail on Cygwin, for instance in test-c32iscntrl.c. Maybe it's actually
the better idea to disable them on Cygwin, too, rather than to change
a working
Hi Bruno,
On Jul 31 20:43, Bruno Haible via Cygwin wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > there are more of those expressions which are disabled on glibc and
> > fail on Cygwin, for instance in test-c32iscntrl.c. Maybe it's actually
> > the better idea to disable them on Cygwin, too, rather than to
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> there are more of those expressions which are disabled on glibc and
> fail on Cygwin, for instance in test-c32iscntrl.c. Maybe it's actually
> the better idea to disable them on Cygwin, too, rather than to change
> a working system...
Sure. There is no standard how to ma
On Jul 31 19:46, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> On Jul 31 16:06, Bruno Haible via Cygwin wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > I have a problem with the c32isalpha function.
> > >
> > > c32isalpha fails for the character U+FF11 FULLWIDTH DIGIT ONE,
> > > because it expects the character t
On Jul 31 16:06, Bruno Haible via Cygwin wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > I have a problem with the c32isalpha function.
> >
> > c32isalpha fails for the character U+FF11 FULLWIDTH DIGIT ONE,
> > because it expects the character to be an alphabetic character.
>
> This is not a big problem. Yo
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I have a problem with the c32isalpha function.
>
> c32isalpha fails for the character U+FF11 FULLWIDTH DIGIT ONE,
> because it expects the character to be an alphabetic character.
This is not a big problem. You can see in the test-c32isalpha.c file
that this test is disa
10 matches
Mail list logo