On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Matthew O. Persico wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 20:27:36 -0400 (EDT), Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Brian Ford wrote:
Is it true that any application I compile under cygwin's
gcc/g++ is automatically under the GPL? Is so I've been doing some
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 04:03:06PM -0500, Brian Ford wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Matthew O. Persico wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 20:27:36 -0400 (EDT), Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
?On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Brian Ford wrote:
?Is it true that any application I compile under cygwin's
?gcc/g++ is
Hi!
Sorry, I just wanted a clarifcation of something I thought I read on
cygwin-apps...
Is it true that any application I compile under cygwin's gcc/g++ is
automatically under the GPL? Is so I've been doing some violating...
sorry.
Is this still true under -mno-cygwin?
--
Unsubscribe info:
Is it true that any application I compile under cygwin's gcc/g++ is
automatically under the GPL? Is so I've been doing some violating...
sorry.
This will link your binary to the cygwin DLL by default. Unless you have
purchased a buy out contract from Red Hat, yes.
Is this still true under
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Brian Ford wrote:
Is it true that any application I compile under cygwin's gcc/g++ is
automatically under the GPL? Is so I've been doing some violating...
sorry.
This will link your binary to the cygwin DLL by default. Unless you have
purchased a buy out contract from
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 20:27:36 -0400 (EDT), Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Brian Ford wrote:
Is it true that any application I compile under cygwin's
gcc/g++ is
automatically under the GPL? Is so I've been doing some
violating...
sorry.
This will link your binary to the
6 matches
Mail list logo