Re: ip.h & tcp.h

2002-04-08 Thread Wu Yongwei
ChangeLog: BSD-style header files ip.h, tcp.h, and udp.h are added, which include definitions for IP, TCP, and UDP packet header structures. Positions: * ip.h.diff is against /usr/include/netinet/ip.h * tcp.h.diff is against /usr/include/netinet/tcp.h * udp.h should be added to /usr/include

Re: ip.h & tcp.h

2002-04-08 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 05:14:27PM +0800, Wu Yongwei wrote: >>You should just adapt whatever you need from the Single UNIX >>Specification. > >Sorry but SUSv2 says nothing about the struct definitions. Or at least >I cannot get any meaningful search results. Ok. In that case we'll have to make

Re: ip.h & tcp.h

2002-04-08 Thread Wu Yongwei
But I am not here to argue. I ask. Should I simply supply the ip.h, tcp.h, >>and udp.h here? I did not because I am not sure about the licence issue. >>And I asked first. > >You DO NOT "simply supply" anything. I suggested that you supply a >patch, as I have done rep

Re: ip.h & tcp.h

2002-04-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:00:58AM +0800, Wu Yongwei wrote: >Thank you for all the responses, even the one telling me not to SHOUT. A >message is better than nothing, and I shouted because it seemed no one >noticed my message. > >But I am not here to argue. I ask. Should I simply

Re: ip.h & tcp.h

2002-04-07 Thread Wu Yongwei
Thank you for all the responses, even the one telling me not to SHOUT. A message is better than nothing, and I shouted because it seemed no one noticed my message. But I am not here to argue. I ask. Should I simply supply the ip.h, tcp.h, and udp.h here? I did not because I am not sure about the

Re: ip.h & tcp.h

2002-04-05 Thread Jason Tishler
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 09:57:31AM -0500, Robinow, David wrote: > Well, I'm somewhat to blame for this situation. >See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2000-09/msg00010.html > > Is the suggestion of "include " reasonable? No. IIRC, this caused problems. See the following: http:

Re: ip.h & tcp.h

2002-04-05 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 04:34:42PM +0800, Wu Yongwei wrote: >Um, no one willing to answer? > >OK, I am changing my request now. CAN CYGWIN DROP IP.H AND TCP.H IN >DISTRIBUTION FOR NOW? http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-03/msg01461.html http://cygwin.com/contrib.html cgf -- Unsubscribe info:

Re: ip.h & tcp.h

2002-04-05 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 04:34:42PM +0800, Wu Yongwei wrote: > Um, no one willing to answer? > > OK, I am changing my request now. CAN CYGWIN DROP IP.H AND TCP.H IN > DISTRIBUTION FOR NOW? No reason to shout. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to C

Re: ip.h & tcp.h

2002-04-05 Thread Wu Yongwei
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:59 AM Subject: ip.h & tcp.h > I noticed that these two header files in /usr/include/netinet is really > missing. I have been using the ones from FreeBSD and that fit very well. I > just need t

ip.h & tcp.h

2002-04-02 Thread Wu Yongwei
I noticed that these two header files in /usr/include/netinet is really missing. I have been using the ones from FreeBSD and that fit very well. I just need to add the following lines to the beginning of ip.h: /* Added by Wu Yongwei */ #ifndef LITTLE_ENDIAN #define LITTLE_ENDIAN 1234 #define BI