On 4/22/2005 10:56 AM, David Rothenberger wrote:
On 4/22/2005 8:52 AM, David Rothenberger wrote:
I ran across a tool called Trader's Little Helper at [url removed
because it trips the cygwin spam filter] that includes the
cygwin1.dll, but doesn't provide source code. Even worse, it puts
I ran across a tool called Trader's Little Helper at
http://thor.prohosting.com/roh0205/ that includes the cygwin1.dll, but
doesn't provide source code. Even worse, it puts cygwin1.dll in C:\WINDOWS!
I then did a search of my hard drive for other copies and was surprised
to find a few more.
On 4/22/2005 8:52 AM, David Rothenberger wrote:
I ran across a tool called Trader's Little Helper at [url removed
because it trips the cygwin spam filter] that includes the
cygwin1.dll, but doesn't provide source code. Even worse, it puts
cygwin1.dll in C:\WINDOWS!
I succeeded in contacting the
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 05:58:24PM -0700, David Rothenberger wrote:
On 4/22/2005 10:56 AM, David Rothenberger wrote:
On 4/22/2005 8:52 AM, David Rothenberger wrote:
I ran across a tool called Trader's Little Helper at [url removed
because it trips the cygwin spam filter] that includes the
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 10:56:53AM -0700, David Rothenberger wrote:
On 4/22/2005 8:52 AM, David Rothenberger wrote:
I ran across a tool called Trader's Little Helper at [url removed
because it trips the cygwin spam filter] that includes the
cygwin1.dll, but doesn't provide source code. Even worse,
At 08:58 PM 4/22/2005, you wrote:
On 4/22/2005 10:56 AM, David Rothenberger wrote:
On 4/22/2005 8:52 AM, David Rothenberger wrote:
I ran across a tool called Trader's Little Helper at [url removed
because it trips the cygwin spam filter] that includes the
cygwin1.dll, but doesn't provide source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/23/05, Larry Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, of course I'm obliged to say IANAL.
Dunno that you're obliged to say it. ;) I-also-ANAL, but I am a
student, which means my information is probably even shakier than
anyone else's. I only chime in
beau wrote:
anyone else's. I only chime in because as best I understand it, once
having found a violator the rights holder must act to protect said
rights; failing to do so may be construed as similar to consent.
That applies only to trademarks, not copyright or patents.
Brian
--
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 06:59:36PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
beau wrote:
anyone else's. I only chime in because as best I understand it, once
having found a violator the rights holder must act to protect said
rights; failing to do so may be construed as similar to consent.
That applies only to
Christopher Faylor wrote:
anyone else's. I only chime in because as best I understand it, once
having found a violator the rights holder must act to protect said
rights; failing to do so may be construed as similar to consent.
That applies only to trademarks, not copyright or patents.
I
10 matches
Mail list logo
