On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 11:29:02AM +0100, J?rg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Bob and Pierre
>
> thanks for your analysis so far.
>
> As Pierre already stated, the trace just has this difference of
> 120 vs. 64 read bytes in line 4538 and the following call for
> the debug output. :(
Do you have access
Hi Bob and Pierre
thanks for your analysis so far.
Bob Byrnes wrote on Friday, November 19, 2004 5:49 PM:
> I spent a little time looking at these straces and scp -v
> output. I still don't understand what's going on, but it
> seems to be unrelated to the recent pipe changes. I say that
> becau
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 11:48:37AM -0500, Bob Byrnes wrote:
> I spent a little time looking at these straces and scp -v output.
> I still don't understand what's going on, but it seems to be unrelated to
> the recent pipe changes. I say that because those changes only affected
> select for writes
I spent a little time looking at these straces and scp -v output.
I still don't understand what's going on, but it seems to be unrelated to
the recent pipe changes. I say that because those changes only affected
select for writes on pipes, and the problem seems to be on the read side.
It looks lik
Hi Pierre,
Pierre A. Humblet wrote on Friday, November 19, 2004 6:14 AM:
> I had a second look at this. It's easy to correlate the trace
> with the -v outputs you provided in
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-11/msg00637.html
> The debug outputs correspond to lines such as "N = write (2,
> xxx)",
At 09:00 PM 11/18/2004 +0100, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>>
>> 109 is "The pipe has been ended". Isn't that strange when reading a pipe?
>> Unfortunately fd 4 was opened in a part of the trace that we don't have.
>
>I'll have a look tomorrow in the office, where fd 4 came from
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 09:00:38PM +0100, J?rg Schaible wrote:
>>I'll have a look tomorrow in the office, where fd 4 came from (thought I
>>posted all related stuff, but trace is hard).
>
> Which is why unsolicited traces are almost always useless.
Point taken.
- J
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 08:57:15PM +0100, J?rg Schaible wrote:
>> If this is a problem with the new pipe code then maybe Bob Byrnes could
>> offer some insight.
>
>As said, I'll take any further action to isolate it. Would you expect a
>difference using the current snapshot?
No.
cgf
--
Unsubscri
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 09:00:38PM +0100, J?rg Schaible wrote:
>I'll have a look tomorrow in the office, where fd 4 came from (thought I
>posted all related stuff, but trace is hard).
Which is why unsolicited traces are almost always useless.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#u
Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 12:27:29PM -0500, Bob Byrnes wrote:
>> > If this is a problem with the new pipe code then maybe Bob Byrnes could
>> > offer some insight.
>>
>> Offhand, I can't think of any way that the new pipe stuff could cause
>> this behavior, but I'll add t
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 09:15:49AM +0100, J?rg Schaible wrote:
[snip]
>>Well, this *is* the list for reporting problems with Cygwin. Sorry,
>>that I missed among all the other 450 mail per month, the one Chris
>>stated, that he don't want straces sent to list without f
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 12:27:29PM -0500, Bob Byrnes wrote:
> > If this is a problem with the new pipe code then maybe Bob Byrnes could
> > offer some insight.
>
> Offhand, I can't think of any way that the new pipe stuff could cause
> this behavior, but I'll add this to my list of (potential) pip
> If this is a problem with the new pipe code then maybe Bob Byrnes could
> offer some insight.
Offhand, I can't think of any way that the new pipe stuff could cause
this behavior, but I'll add this to my list of (potential) pipe-related
things to investigate and think about.
We use scp with the
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 09:15:49AM +0100, J?rg Schaible wrote:
>Dave Korn wrote on Wednesday, November 17, 2004 7:20 PM:
>>So basically what you've done is say to yourself "I'll just send tons
>>and tons of stuff (which I know will be of no use or interest to 99.9%
>>of the recipients) to absolutel
Dave Korn wrote on Wednesday, November 17, 2004 7:20 PM:
[snip]
> So basically what you've done is say to yourself "I'll just
> send tons and tons of stuff (which I know will be of no use
> or interest to 99.9% of the recipients) to absolutely
> everyone in the hopes that it might be relevant t
Reini Urban wrote on Wednesday, November 17, 2004 7:21 PM:
> Hi Jörg :)
>
>> So, if you can't or won't help, I prefer no answer.
>
> Downgrading to cygwin-1.3.11 should help.
Hmmm. My old cygwin.dll was not *that* old. 1.5.9 or so (unfortunately I
deleted my download cache to be sure to gain t
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 07:20:56PM +0100, Reini Urban wrote:
>or if you like living on the edge there's a new experimental "noparent"
>branch for cygwin1.dll
Sigh. Do not use this branch. It is not intended for anyone but me.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Pr
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible
> Sent: 17 November 2004 17:41
> Dave Korn wrote on Wednesday, November 17, 2004 6:24 PM:
> > *Mine* contained more useful info and was a fraction of the size.
>
> Well, nonetheless, none of your comments really help w
Jörg Schaible schrieb:
I know, that there were massive changes handling fork() and the
pipes. So what shall I do, if a the problem now only manifests
regularly if scp is called by Java calling a dos batch calling a
shell script ? Using strace the problem is going to happen much more
unlikely. So wh
Dave Korn wrote on Wednesday, November 17, 2004 6:24 PM:
> I beg to differ.
>
> My post contained the useful information that dumping a
> couple of hundred Kb of unsolicited strace output on the list
> is a pointless waste of time.
>
> Yours contained a couple of hundred Kb of unsolicited
> -Original Message-
> From: Jörg Schaible
> Sent: 17 November 2004 17:22
> Dave Korn wrote on Wednesday, November 17, 2004 6:18 PM:
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible
> >> Sent: 16 November 2004 17:39
> >
> > Sure. How about 200k of
Dave Korn wrote on Wednesday, November 17, 2004 6:18 PM:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible
>> Sent: 16 November 2004 17:39
>
> Sure. How about 200k of unintelligible gibberish? I'm
> sure we'd all _love_ to see it.
At least it contained more usefu
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible
> Sent: 16 November 2004 17:39
> Hi folks,
>
> after upgrading to latest cygwin1.dll and openssh I have
> massive problems with ssh/scp. Using e.g. the same scp
> command it fails from time to time called from the comm
Hi folks,
after upgrading to latest cygwin1.dll and openssh I have massive problems with
ssh/scp. Using e.g. the same scp command it fails from time to time called from
the command line. Unfortunately it fails more often when called from a shell
script and quite every time when this shell scrip
24 matches
Mail list logo