Re: xargs completely broken under cygwin 3.6.0-0.108.gb7f5a33200a9

2024-04-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin
On Apr 2 08:38, Bruce Jerrick via Cygwin wrote: > 'xargs' is back to working with cygwin-3.6.0-0.109.ga0a25849f9dd . > > Thanks for the quick fix! > -- Bruce Thanks for the report and testing! Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ:

Re: xargs completely broken under cygwin 3.6.0-0.108.gb7f5a33200a9

2024-04-02 Thread Bruce Jerrick via Cygwin
'xargs' is back to working with cygwin-3.6.0-0.109.ga0a25849f9dd . Thanks for the quick fix! -- Bruce -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation:https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info:

Re: xargs completely broken under cygwin 3.6.0-0.108.gb7f5a33200a9

2024-04-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin
On Apr 2 12:44, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: > On Apr 2 01:42, Bruce Jerrick via Cygwin wrote: > > I just did binary-search regression tests on the available > > old test versions, and found this: > > > > OK:  cygwin-3.6.0-0.86.gbfe2790e7bc4.tar.xz > > BAD:

Re: xargs completely broken under cygwin 3.6.0-0.108.gb7f5a33200a9

2024-04-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin
On Apr 2 01:42, Bruce Jerrick via Cygwin wrote: > I just did binary-search regression tests on the available > old test versions, and found this: > > OK:  cygwin-3.6.0-0.86.gbfe2790e7bc4.tar.xz > BAD: cygwin-3.6.0-0.92.g8bd6ba8f16ec.tar.xz Thanks, I found the offending patch, but I have to

Re: xargs completely broken under cygwin 3.6.0-0.108.gb7f5a33200a9

2024-04-02 Thread Bruce Jerrick via Cygwin
I just did binary-search regression tests on the available old test versions, and found this: OK:  cygwin-3.6.0-0.86.gbfe2790e7bc4.tar.xz BAD: cygwin-3.6.0-0.92.g8bd6ba8f16ec.tar.xz - Bruce -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: xargs completely broken under cygwin 3.6.0-0.108.gb7f5a33200a9

2024-04-02 Thread Bruce Jerrick via Cygwin
Sorry, I missed the xargs.strace file; it's included as an attachment. --- Process 7020 created --- Process 7020 loaded C:\Windows\System32\ntdll.dll at 7ff99e03 --- Process 7020 loaded C:\Windows\System32\kernel32.dll at 7ff99ca4 --- Process 7020 loaded

Re: xargs completely broken under cygwin 3.6.0-0.108.gb7f5a33200a9

2024-04-02 Thread Bruce Jerrick via Cygwin
No need for attachments, the results are simply the same failure: > Could you please try running: > ...   $ xargs -t --show-limits < /dev/null   xargs: Unexpected suffix cmdline on cmdline > and it would be useful if you could run a failing command under strace e.g. > ...   $ strace -o

Re: xargs completely broken under cygwin 3.6.0-0.108.gb7f5a33200a9

2024-04-02 Thread Brian Inglis via Cygwin
On 2024-04-01 21:36, Bruce Jerrick via Cygwin wrote: 'xargs' (part of 'findutils') is completely broken if   3.6.0-0.108.gb7f5a33200a9 (test version) is installed: ^ Cygwin   $ xargs   xargs: Unexpected suffix cmdline on cmdline   $ xargs --version   xargs: Unexpected suffix cmdline

xargs completely broken under cygwin 3.6.0-0.108.gb7f5a33200a9

2024-04-01 Thread Bruce Jerrick via Cygwin
'xargs' (part of 'findutils') is completely broken if   3.6.0-0.108.gb7f5a33200a9 (test version) is installed:   $ xargs   xargs: Unexpected suffix cmdline on cmdline   $ xargs --version   xargs: Unexpected suffix cmdline on cmdline   $ echo narf | xargs echo   xargs: Unexpected suffix cmdline