setup - inilint & building on cygwin

2002-05-04 Thread Robert Collins
Just an update: 1) inilint, the setup.ini validator is coming along. It can be enabled via --enable-inilint on the configure line. It doesn't do anything just yet though, but will build successfully. 2) I had a configure.in syntax error that was breaking on-cygwin builds. That has been corrected.

Re: new cygwin package: cgoban

2002-05-04 Thread Charles Wilson
Earnie Boyd wrote: >> Bad example, Earnie. The current rxvt package is, itself, in a >> single binary, BOTH Win32 AND X11. It is fine right where it is >> (--prefix=/usr). > No, it's a good example. And you're correct the existing rxvt > package is fine right where it is. It's the one t

Re: new cygwin package: cgoban

2002-05-04 Thread Earnie Boyd
Charles Wilson wrote: > Earnie Boyd wrote: > > > I see it's time for me to chime in. We the cygwin-apps developers must > > insist that all X11 packages use --prefix=/usr/X11R6 because it's possible > > for an X11 package to be both Win32 and X11, E.G.: rxvt. And I the user > > could want to us

Re: new cygwin package: cgoban

2002-05-04 Thread Charles Wilson
Earnie Boyd wrote: > I see it's time for me to chime in. We the cygwin-apps developers must > insist that all X11 packages use --prefix=/usr/X11R6 because it's possible > for an X11 package to be both Win32 and X11, E.G.: rxvt. And I the user > could want to use either depending on the moode (

RE: RFP: boost libraries

2002-05-04 Thread Robert Collins
> -Original Message- > From: Robert Collins > Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 12:44 AM ... for clarity: > > * Most of these libraries are just C++ templates in header files > > Ah. I wasn't aware of that. Just dumb luck I guess - picking > the regex library, which does have a .a component

RE: RFP: boost libraries

2002-05-04 Thread Robert Collins
> -Original Message- > From: David Abrahams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:11 AM > * Most of these libraries are just C++ templates in header files Ah. I wasn't aware of that. Just dumb luck I guess - picking the regex library, which does have a .a componen

Re: new cygwin package: cgoban

2002-05-04 Thread Earnie Boyd
Robert Collins wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 5:04 AM > > > Volker Zell agreed. Nobody else responded. I kinda like it, but FHS > > has moved away from that; now on Red Hat systems it appears that ONLY >

new logging structure for setup

2002-05-04 Thread Robert Collins
I've turned the global log() function into a C++ stream. For a new binary, the method LogSingleton::SetInstance() must be called with a concrete object to setup logging. After that, you can log with == log (LOG_TIMESTAMP) << "foo bar " << anInt << aString << endLog; == The log() and the endLog;

RE: new cygwin package: cgoban

2002-05-04 Thread Robert Collins
Get a new setup.exe from http://www.cygwin.com/setup.exe. Rob > -Original Message- > From: Teun Burgers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 5:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: new cygwin package: cgoban > > > I see the original message has led > to qui

Re: new cygwin package: cgoban

2002-05-04 Thread Teun Burgers
I see the original message has led to quite some discussion and even a decree. What is the status on the upload? My setup.exe seems to crash on an increasing number of mirrors right after download of setup.ini. This is the message: SETUP heeft een algemene beschermingsfout veroorzaakt in