Robert Collins wrote:
>
> This does not belong in setup. It belongs in a postinstall script for a
> package. One possible package is the one John Morrison put together that
> I'll be uploading realsoonnow. Another is cygwin itself.
I just wrote such a patch. See the patches-l. Further discussi
Hi,
I have problems with cygwin apache php.
The htdocs are well accessed.
But when I try:
/var/www/htdocs/test.php
It runs only one time, and then the server is dead.
The test.php page is well displayed until the
"APACHE_INCLUDE" title.
I get this error:
/var/log/apache/error_log
[Tue Sep 10
I just checked out procps that Chris January ported. At least "top",
"uptime" and "watch" work, so you have my vote for including this in Cygwin.
Joe Buehler
I can see only minor ploblems:
- setup.hint: I always seen people suggest to put new packages that can
do no real damane directly in current, and not test branch. but again
this could be better this way.
- binary package:
- docs are installed in /usr/doc/astyle_1.15.3/ instead of the more
usu
> [snip]
>
> > If the values you are seeing in the procps utilities don't look like
the
> > ones on your Linux box, this is probably an indication of a bug and
> > should be reported to the cygwin-apps mailing list.
>
> Chris, I've reported this to the cygwin-apps list but got no response
at
> a
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 11:19:00AM -0400, Robb, Sam wrote:
> > ...where are all the subscribers of this list? How should we ever
> > get enough positive votes for a package if nobody cares?
>
> ...and...
>
> > Please note, *all* maintainers are welcome to give his/her voice for
> > a new packag
Morrison, John wrote:
>>From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Update:
>>
>>procps (reviewed, 5 votes, John, Lapo, Nicholas, Robert and me,
>> discussion needed)
>>doxygen (reviewed, 3 votes, Lapo and Robert, package
>>cleanup needed(?))
>>astyle (reviewed,
> ...where are all the subscribers of this list? How should we ever
> get enough positive votes for a package if nobody cares?
...and...
> Please note, *all* maintainers are welcome to give his/her voice for
> a new package.
What about non-maintainers? I'd be perfectly happy to try out packag
> Hi,
>
> > >>/etc/hosts -> ${SYSTEMROOT}/system32/drivers/etc/hosts
> >
> > So, like all great ideas, all that it needs is an actual patch to make
> > it happen.
>
Uhh - what about just /windows/hosts (for those that are non NT based) ?
> Ok, I will have a go at this. As it involves mods to the
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 04:12:00PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > astyle (reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo, package cleanup needed))
>
> I also vote for astyle - i forgot to mention it in the previous post.
>
> > Btw., I'm under the impres
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> astyle (reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo, package cleanup needed))
I also vote for astyle - i forgot to mention it in the previous post.
> Btw., I'm under the impression that bookkeeping as above could be useful.
I like the idea and you hav
> From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Update:
>
> procps (reviewed, 5 votes, John, Lapo, Nicholas, Robert and me,
> discussion needed)
> doxygen (reviewed, 3 votes, Lapo and Robert, package
> cleanup needed(?))
> astyle (reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and La
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 06:56:59AM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
>
> --- Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > doxygen (reviewed, 0 votes)
>
> I actually voted for this as well as checked it out.
I saw your review but you didn't vote for it (hey, I'm German, I'm
the perfec
Update:
procps (reviewed, 5 votes, John, Lapo, Nicholas, Robert and me,
discussion needed)
doxygen (reviewed, 3 votes, Lapo and Robert, package cleanup needed(?))
astyle (reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo, package cleanup needed))
Btw., I'm under the impression that b
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:24:54AM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> >
> >procps (reviewed, 2 votes, John and me)
>
> I voted for this one, after reviewing it.
Ok, didn't see that.
> >ELFIO (reviewed, 2 votes, Joshua and Nicholas)
> >doxygen (reviewed, 0 votes)
>
> Again, I voted
--- Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> doxygen (reviewed, 0 votes)
I actually voted for this as well as checked it out.
__
Yahoo! - We Remember
9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost
http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribu
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 08:55:12AM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> > The Cygwin net distro isn't sort of a one man show, it's a community
> > effort. It's not Chris and me who are the responsible people for
> > reviewing a package and we are not the only people with the right
> > to upload packages.
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > astyle (NOT reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo)
One more thing - this time it is not a package issue.
According to 'astyle --help' the program searches for .astylerc in three
places:
1) environ
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> astyle (NOT reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo)
I did a review of the package itself, not of its feature. astyle contains
a lot of options and since I haven't used it in the past its not easy to
tell if specific options behaves as expected.
> The Cygwin net distro isn't sort of a one man show, it's a community
> effort. It's not Chris and me who are the responsible people for
> reviewing a package and we are not the only people with the right
> to upload packages.
This is one of the reasons I think that it might be better to:
1) M
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:40:53AM +, Gareth Pearce wrote:
>
>>Hmmm I was under the impression that for a package to be accepted it needed
>>a) - someone to check it for packaging.
>>b) - at least 3 votes saying that it is desired to be seen in the
>>distribution.
>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 11:37:45AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Ok, so the state is now:
Update:
procps (reviewed, 4 votes, John, Lapo, Robert and me,s
discussion needed)
doxygen (reviewed, 2 vote, Lapo and Robert)
astyle (NOT reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo)
C
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:55:20AM +0300, Serge Lamikhov-Center wrote:
> Updated packages located at the same place:
> http://elfio.sourceforge.net/ELFIO-1.0.0-1.tar.bz2
> http://elfio.sourceforge.net/ELFIO-1.0.0-1-src.tar.bz2
>
> Please review and vote!
> Thank you.
>
> Changes:
> 1. tutorial.c
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:18:16PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> Insanely busy at the moment.
This is a general problem I assume. I'm doing the same as you,
working just voluntarily on Cygwin. It's not a revenue generating
project.
> > least *some* reviewing of a package.
>
> I think t
>
>
> procps (reviewed, 2 votes, John and me)
>
That's a yes from me.
> ELFIO (reviewed, 2 votes, Joshua and Nicholas)
> doxygen (reviewed, 0 votes)
>
Ths is indeed useful, pro.
> astyle (NOT reviewed, 1 vote, Gareth)
>
>
Abuot ELFIO and astyle I know not what they
n Wed, 2002-09-11 at 19:06, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> ...where are all the subscribers of this list? How should we ever
> get enough positive votes for a package if nobody cares? I always
> see the same names if it comes to vote for a package and I see
> always the same (less) names if it comes
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:40:53AM +, Gareth Pearce wrote:
> Hmmm I was under the impression that for a package to be accepted it needed
> a) - someone to check it for packaging.
> b) - at least 3 votes saying that it is desired to be seen in the
> distribution.
>
> which so long as person i
27 matches
Mail list logo
