Updated fvwm-2.4.16

2003-06-06 Thread Joakim Erdfelt
This is my first time doing this. (so be kind) ;-) I have made a new package for fvwm v2.4.16 It can be found at ... http://joakim.erdfelt.net/cygwin/fvwm/fvwm-2.4.16-1.tar.bz2 http://joakim.erdfelt.net/cygwin/fvwm/fvwm-2.4.16-1-src.tar.bz2 http://joakim.erdfelt.net/cygwin/fvwm/setup.hint Didn't

Re: Updated patchutils...I made a booboo

2003-06-06 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 05:46:43PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > >I ended up building patchutils and libxml2 under 1.5.0 and am about to upload > >fixed packages.. Corrina, if you have a minute, could you replace the current > >binary package with

Re: Updated patchutils...I made a booboo

2003-06-06 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > Bump the release number - otherwise setup won't notice the change, and will > throw md5 errors on local package caches which have an updated setup.ini, > but old tarball. > > > Max. Will do. Thanks. Elfyn -- Elfyn McBratney (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sy

Re: Updated patchutils...I made a booboo

2003-06-06 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 05:46:43PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > >I ended up building patchutils and libxml2 under 1.5.0 and am about to upload > >fixed packages.. Corrina, if you have a minute, could you replace the current > >binary package with

Re: Updated patchutils...I made a booboo

2003-06-06 Thread Max Bowsher
Elfyn McBratney wrote: > I ended up building patchutils and libxml2 under 1.5.0 and am about to upload > fixed packages.. Corrina, if you have a minute, could you replace the current > binary package with > > > > this one? Or would it be b

Re: Updated patchutils...I made a booboo

2003-06-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 05:46:43PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: >I ended up building patchutils and libxml2 under 1.5.0 and am about to upload >fixed packages.. Corrina, if you have a minute, could you replace the current >binary package with > >

Updated patchutils...I made a booboo

2003-06-06 Thread Elfyn McBratney
I ended up building patchutils and libxml2 under 1.5.0 and am about to upload fixed packages.. Corrina, if you have a minute, could you replace the current binary package with this one? Or would it be better if I bump the release number

Re: [Updated package] mc-4.6.0-4 (fwd)

2003-06-06 Thread Elfyn McBratney
-- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 15:06:49 +0100 From: Elfyn McBratney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Pavel Tsekov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Updated package] mc-4.6.0-4 On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Elfyn McB

Re: [Updated package] mc-4.6.0-4

2003-06-06 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > PS- Shall I remove 4.6.0-3 ? Ooops! Kill everything except 4.6.0-4. 4.5.xx is too old to be useful. All 4.6.0-x up to -4 have this ftpfs bug.

Re: [Updated package] mc-4.6.0-4

2003-06-06 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > Here are the links: > http://ptsekov.gamersrevolt.it/cygwin/release/mc/mc-4.6.0-4.tar.bz2 > http://ptsekov.gamersrevolt.it/cygwin/release/mc/mc-4.6.0-4-src.tar.bz2 Uploaded. Please send an annoucement in a couple of hours Thanks, Elfyn PS- Shall I remov

[Updated package] mc-4.6.0-4

2003-06-06 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Hello, An updated Midnight Commander package is available. It addresses this problem: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-04/msg02119.html As I've already indicated on the main list this is a bug introduced by me and it is specific to the Cygwin version of MC. This version does *NOT* add

Re: Setup auto-dependency generation?

2003-06-06 Thread Max Bowsher
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > I'll just throw this out there to see if it's more burger than bun. This came > to mind when I read the "libpcre setup.hint is BROKEN" thread: Would it be > possible for upset or something to automatically generate the > setup.hint/setup.ini dependencies, or at least ch

Re: [root@sources.redhat.com: Cron cd/sourceware/ftp/anonftp/pub/cygwin; /sourceware/infra/bin/cygwin/upset -C-u setup.ini; /usr/local/bin/upx -q -q -q setup.exe || exit 0]

2003-06-06 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I've fixed this. > > cgf Oops, Sorry. Thanks. Elfyn -- Elfyn McBratney (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Systems Administrator ABCtales.com / Ubertales.co.uk

[root@sources.redhat.com: Cron cd /sourceware/ftp/anonftp/pub/cygwin; /sourceware/infra/bin/cygwin/upset -C -u setup.ini; /usr/local/bin/upx -q -q -q setup.exe || exit 0]

2003-06-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
I've fixed this. cgf - Forwarded message from Cron Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cd /sourceware/ftp/anonftp/pub/cygwin; /sourceware/infra/bin/cygwin/upset -C -u setup.ini; /usr/local/bin/upx -q

RFC: Setup auto-dependency generation?

2003-06-06 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
I'll just throw this out there to see if it's more burger than bun. This came to mind when I read the "libpcre setup.hint is BROKEN" thread: Would it be possible for upset or something to automatically generate the setup.hint/setup.ini dependencies, or at least check them? Seems to me that, since