Re: For package maintainers: dlls which use fdopen

2003-07-29 Thread Charles Wilson
Christopher Faylor wrote: cygXpm-X4.dll cygXpm-noX4.dll cygbz2-1.dll cygz.dll done. cygbz21.0.dll this is a compatibility library. It won't be re-compiled; no new apps should be using it. cygncurses7.dll stay tuned. -- Chuck

Re: [ITP] wtf

2003-07-29 Thread Marcel Telka
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:17:11PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: As per John Morrison's suggestion, I would like to contribute and maintain wtf (http://cronus.comp.utas.edu.au/~thsutton/computing/wtf.html). wtf(6) is a utility provided by some UNIX and UNIX-like systems including Slackware

Re: Proposal: psutils (again)

2003-07-29 Thread Volker Quetschke
Hi Daniel, I got my source archive from a server in France, but I just noticed, that the author's original site is up again: http://knackered.knackered.org/angus/psutils/ Here you can download the source, and it does *not* contain the Makefile. You probably have the Debian patched version.

RE: [ITP] wtf

2003-07-29 Thread Morrison, John
Igor Pechtchanski wrote: As per John Morrison's suggestion, I would like to contribute and maintain wtf (http://cronus.comp.utas.edu.au/~thsutton/computing/wtf.html). wtf(6) is a utility provided by some UNIX and UNIX-like systems including Slackware Linux and NetBSD. It translates

RE: For package maintainers: dlls which use fdopen

2003-07-29 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Robert McNulty Junior wrote: I thought Cygwin1.dll was the main dll. Should it not have already been rebuilt? I'll check out the sources tonight and look into this. Could have sworn you built the 1.5.1 cygwin1.dll. Robert McNulty Junior It has been re-built and Chris is

Re: [setup PATCH] next_dialog micropatch (2)

2003-07-29 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 06:50, Max Bowsher wrote: You realise that *all* I am doing with this patch is to change how data is passed between a function and it's caller? Yes, and its that aspect I objected to. I don't understand what was so unclear. Rob -- GPG key available at:

Re: Er I mean... (was: RE: [PATCH] next_dialog micropatch (3)(was: RE: [setup PATCH] next_dialog micropatch (2)))

2003-07-29 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 13:47, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: ...this straightforward patch: 2003-07-28 Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] * dialog.h (do_fromcwd): Change function declaration. * fromcwd.cc (do_fromcwd): Change return type to bool. Eliminate use of

RE: [setup PATCH] next_dialog micropatch (2)

2003-07-29 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 11:11, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: Seems like a lot of work to go to just to eliminate a global variable. Getting the direction right gives huge long term benefits. This is precisely why I want small patches, as it lets me evaluate each chunk. Note the commits I got done

Re: Proposal: psutils (again)

2003-07-29 Thread Daniel Bößwetter
Hi Volker, You are right, I forgot these lines. What's next? Will someone upload the package? Bye, Daniel Volker Quetschke wrote: Hi Daniel, I got my source archive from a server in France, but I just noticed, that the author's original site is up again:

Re: [setup PATCH] next_dialog micropatch (2)

2003-07-29 Thread Max Bowsher
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: Robert Collins wrote: On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 02:13, Max Bowsher wrote: If we do add a class, it should probably be a thread class from which all of our threaded tasks can derive. Regardless, I don't see that any

Re: [setup PATCH] next_dialog micropatch (2)

2003-07-29 Thread Max Bowsher
Robert Collins wrote: On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 06:50, Max Bowsher wrote: You realise that *all* I am doing with this patch is to change how data is passed between a function and it's caller? Yes, and its that aspect I objected to. I don't understand what was so unclear. I'm unclear on why

Re: Er I mean... (was: RE: [PATCH] next_dialog micropatch (3)(was: RE: [setup PATCH] next_dialog micropatch (2)))

2003-07-29 Thread Max Bowsher
Robert Collins wrote: On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 13:47, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: ...this straightforward patch: 2003-07-28 Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] * dialog.h (do_fromcwd): Change function declaration. * fromcwd.cc (do_fromcwd): Change return type to bool. Eliminate use of

Re: [setup PATCH] next_dialog micropatch (2)

2003-07-29 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 19:32, Max Bowsher wrote: Robert Collins wrote: On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 06:50, Max Bowsher wrote: You realise that *all* I am doing with this patch is to change how data is passed between a function and it's caller? Yes, and its that aspect I objected to. I

gcj file input problem, available incorrect

2003-07-29 Thread Jørgen Nørgaard
Hi, while using the gcj component of gcc (java compiler frontemd for gcc) we have found a peculiar problem with FileInputStreams on Windows (XP). Given Freader.java: import java.io.*; public class Freader { static public void main(String arg[]) { try {

Re: [setup PATCH] next_dialog micropatch (2)

2003-07-29 Thread Max Bowsher
Robert Collins wrote: On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 19:32, Max Bowsher wrote: I'm also extremely puzzled, since you seem to be objecting to the use of a return value to communicate from a callee to a caller function. Any other method *must* be more complicated, and I do believe in avoiding unnecessary

Re: [setup PATCH] next_dialog micropatch (2)

2003-07-29 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 20:13, Max Bowsher wrote: I.e., I'm working on the global variable ugliness, not the returns program flow decisions ugliness. The fact that I am solving the former should not compel me to solve the latter simultaneously. cheekyAfter all, patches should be modular, and as

Re: [setup PATCH] OnAcceptActivation

2003-07-29 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 08:36, Max Bowsher wrote: Here at last... OnAcceptActivation! Extracted from the bulk of Gary's changes, bugfixed (the DWL_MSGRESULT logic was inverted), and also removing the bumper code in SplashPage and SourcePage which was substituting for this functionality.

Please upload: docbook-xsl-1.61.3-2

2003-07-29 Thread Marcel Telka
Hi. Please upload updated docbook-xsl packages: http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.61.3-2-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.61.3-2.tar.bz2 and remove obsolete 1.61.2-1 files. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka

[setup PATCH] Rework do_ini [next_dialog removal (2a)]

2003-07-29 Thread Max Bowsher
Let's see if this approach is more satisfactory... +2003-07-29 Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] + + * ini.cc (do_ini_thread): Return bool. + (do_ini_thread_reflector): Put returned bool in lParam. + * threebar.cc (WM_APP_SETUP_INI_DOWNLOAD_COMPLETE): Rework for new + meaning of lParam. + Index:

Re: Proposal: psutils (again)

2003-07-29 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Daniel Bößwetter wrote: Hi Volker, You are right, I forgot these lines. What's next? Will someone upload the package? Not yet, I'm afraid. The binaries in usr/bin (in the package) are not stripped. Please strip them. Also, you have 'TCM Port' at the end of your

Re: [setup PATCH] OnAcceptActivation

2003-07-29 Thread Max Bowsher
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: and also removing the bumper code in SplashPage and SourcePage which was substituting for this functionality. DOH! How the heck did I miss those?!?! Easily, apparently, since I only just noticed the similar arrangements for skipping RootPage in a download-only

Re: Please upload: docbook-xsl-1.61.3-2

2003-07-29 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Marcel Telka wrote: Hi. Please upload updated docbook-xsl packages: http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.61.3-2-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.61.3-2.tar.bz2 Uploaded. Please send an announcement in a couple of hours. Thanks,

Re: TEST: patch-2.5.8-5

2003-07-29 Thread David Rothenberger
Christopher Faylor writes: I've rebuilt Corinna's version of patch using 1.5.1 import libraries so it should now work correctly with a 1.5.1 or greater DLL. It still doesn't work for me. I get $ date | patch --dry-run patch: write error : Illegal seek It works if I recompile from

Re: Proposal: psutils (again)

2003-07-29 Thread Daniel Bößwetter
Hi Elfyn, Elfyn McBratney wrote: On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Daniel Bößwetter wrote: Hi Volker, You are right, I forgot these lines. What's next? Will someone upload the package? Not yet, I'm afraid. The binaries in usr/bin (in the package) are not stripped. Please strip them. Also, you

Re: gcj file input problem, available incorrect

2003-07-29 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
Wrong list, redirecting. Please use the cygwin at cygwin dot com list for all further discussion. Igor On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Jørgen Nørgaard wrote: Hi, while using the gcj component of gcc (java compiler frontemd for gcc) we have found a peculiar problem with FileInputStreams on

Re: Proposal: psutils (again)

2003-07-29 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Daniel Bößwetter wrote: Hi Elfyn, Elfyn McBratney wrote: On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Daniel Bößwetter wrote: Hi Volker, You are right, I forgot these lines. What's next? Will someone upload the package? Not yet, I'm afraid. The binaries in usr/bin

XFree86 Build for 1.5.0/1

2003-07-29 Thread Harold L Hunt II
I have never subscribed to this mailing list before, but it looks like this is where the real business of Cygwin takes place. I started reading the archives of the 1.5.0/1 discussion today and realized that some other people might be waiting for me to release an updated build of XFree86 for

Re: XFree86 Build for 1.5.0/1

2003-07-29 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: I have never subscribed to this mailing list before, but it looks like this is where the real business of Cygwin takes place. I started reading the archives of the 1.5.0/1 discussion today and realized that some other people might be waiting

tetex-bin-2.0.2 for 1.3 and 1.5.1

2003-07-29 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
I've built tetex-bin for 1.3 and 1.5.1. Previous tetex-bin releases must be removed. Applications that link to libkpathsea3 must be rebuilt. Jan. http://lilypond.org/cygwin/uploads/tetex/tetex-bin/setup.hint sdesc: The TeX text formatting system (binaries). test: 2.0.2-11 curr: 2.0.2-2

lilypond-1.6.11 for 1.3 and 1.7.29 for 1.5.1

2003-07-29 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
I've built lilypond for 1.3 and 1.5.1. Previous releases must be removed. Jan. http://lilypond.org/cygwin/uploads/lilypond/setup.hint sdesc: A program for printing sheet music test: 1.7.29-11 curr: 1.6.11-1 category: Publishing requires: bash cygwin fileutils findutils ghostscript

Re: XFree86 Build for 1.5.0/1

2003-07-29 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, David Rothenberger wrote: Harold L Hunt II wrote: I have never subscribed to this mailing list before, but it looks like this is where the real business of Cygwin takes place. I started reading the archives of the 1.5.0/1 discussion today and realized that some

Re: XFree86 Build for 1.5.0/1

2003-07-29 Thread David Rothenberger
Elfyn McBratney wrote: On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, David Rothenberger wrote: Harold L Hunt II wrote: I have never subscribed to this mailing list before, but it looks like this is where the real business of Cygwin takes place. I started reading the archives of the 1.5.0/1 discussion

Re: XFree86 Build for 1.5.0/1

2003-07-29 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Elfyn, I know we have a dependency on ncurses... and possibly jpeg, png, and/or tiff. However, I think all of those have been updated, no? Harold Elfyn McBratney wrote: On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, David Rothenberger wrote: Harold L Hunt II wrote: I have never subscribed to this mailing list

Re: guile-1.6.4 for 1.3 and 1.5.1

2003-07-29 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On 29 Jul 2003, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: http://lilypond.org/cygwin/uploads/guile/guile-doc/setup.hint sdesc: The GNU extension language and Scheme interpreter (documentation) test: 1.6.4-11 curr: 1.6.4-2 category: doc requires: texinfo external-source: guile ldesc: The GNU extension

Re: tetex-bin-2.0.2 for 1.3 and 1.5.1

2003-07-29 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On 29 Jul 2003, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: sdesc: The TeX text formatting system (binaries). test: 2.0.2-11 curr: 2.0.2-2 category: Text Publishing # There's no need to require a texmf tree, although not doing so # might be confusing. requires: bash clear cygutils cygwin ed diffutils

Re: guile-1.6.4 for 1.3 and 1.5.1

2003-07-29 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Elfyn McBratney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: category: doc requires: texinfo external-source: guile ldesc: The GNU extension language and Scheme interpreter (documentation) This package contains the documentation for guile, including both a reference manual (via `info guile'), and a

Re: [setup PATCH] OnAcceptActivation

2003-07-29 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 23:59, Max Bowsher wrote: What is the rationale for the lowercase wants? http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00750.html It should be fairly clear from the context, but I can enlarge: With C++ it can be hard to tell if you are calling a static or non static

Re: tetex-bin-2.0.2 for 1.3 and 1.5.1

2003-07-29 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote: On 29 Jul 2003, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: sdesc: The TeX text formatting system (binaries). test: 2.0.2-11 curr: 2.0.2-2 category: Text Publishing # There's no need to require a texmf tree, although not doing so # might be confusing.

Re: tetex-bin-2.0.2 for 1.3 and 1.5.1

2003-07-29 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Elfyn McBratney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: requires: bash clear cygutils cygwin ed diffutils fileutils findutils gawk grep libjpeg6b libjpeg62 libkpathsea3abi13 libkpathsea3 libncurses6 libncurses7 libpng12 libtiff3 libtiff4 perl sed sh-utils textutils termcap zlib zlib is on the

Error in termcap setup.hint

2003-07-29 Thread Max Bowsher
There is an error in the termcap setup.hint. The listed curr version doesn't exist, and the 20020930-1 version isn't published to setup.ini at all. The result is that a [test] termcap is installed, since it is in Base. Max.

Re: Error in termcap setup.hint

2003-07-29 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: There is an error in the termcap setup.hint. The listed curr version doesn't exist, and the 20020930-1 version isn't published to setup.ini at all. The result is that a [test] termcap is installed, since it is in Base. I hope I'm not tredding on

Re: XFree86 Build for 1.5.0/1

2003-07-29 Thread Charles Wilson
Harold L Hunt II wrote: Elfyn, I know we have a dependency on ncurses... and possibly jpeg, png, and/or tiff. However, I think all of those have been updated, no? jpeg, png, tiff, and zlib have been updated to 1.5.0 zlib has been updated to 1.5.1 ncurses has been updated to 1.5.0 -- and

Re: XFree86 Build for 1.5.0/1

2003-07-29 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Charles Wilson wrote: Harold L Hunt II wrote: Elfyn, I know we have a dependency on ncurses... and possibly jpeg, png, and/or tiff. However, I think all of those have been updated, no? jpeg, png, tiff, and zlib have been updated to 1.5.0 zlib has been updated to 1.5.1 ncurses has been

Re: Who's who of packagers?

2003-07-29 Thread Frédéric L. W. Meunier
I think cygwin-apps is more appropriate for what I wrote. How does one check who the maintainer of a package is; e.g. to make sure it is not oneself? And how does one check who the maintainer of a package is ? I was looking for the Links one. I had to check the January 2002 cygwin-announce