gcc 3.3.3 builds corrupt lesstif-0.93.94

2004-10-22 Thread Harold L Hunt II
The lesstif package was last built and released (0.93.94) with gcc-3.3.1 (or earlier, not sure). Performing a rebuild of the lesstif source as released (or any lesstif version after that) results in a good build, but one that gives a status access violation *immediately* upon being loaded;

RE: gcc 3.3.3 builds corrupt lesstif-0.93.94

2004-10-22 Thread Billinghurst, David \(CALCRTS\)
From: Harold L Hunt II The lesstif package was last built and released (0.93.94) with gcc-3.3.1 (or earlier, not sure). Performing a rebuild of the lesstif source as released (or any lesstif version after that) results in a good build, but one that gives a status access violation

Re: gcc 3.3.3 builds corrupt lesstif-0.93.94

2004-10-22 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS) wrote: | I have seen this with a few packages I have tried to build recently. | One case I was looking at this week was octave with a home build shared | libstdc++. This used to work for me. I preume you mean the 2.0

Re: gcc 3.3.3 builds corrupt lesstif-0.93.94

2004-10-22 Thread Brian Ford
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Harold L Hunt II wrote: The lesstif package was last built and released (0.93.94) with gcc-3.3.1 (or earlier, not sure). Performing a rebuild of the lesstif source as released (or any lesstif version after that) results in a good build, but one that gives a status access

Re: gcc 3.3.3 builds corrupt lesstif-0.93.94

2004-10-22 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 09:58:32AM -0500, Brian Ford wrote: On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Harold L Hunt II wrote: The lesstif package was last built and released (0.93.94) with gcc-3.3.1 (or earlier, not sure). Performing a rebuild of the lesstif source as released (or any lesstif version after that)

Re: gcc 3.3.3 builds corrupt lesstif-0.93.94

2004-10-22 Thread Brian Ford
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 09:58:32AM -0500, Brian Ford wrote: You might also want to be aware of: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2004-09/msg01101.html Does this mean that I should generate a new version of binutils? Not necessarily, it

Re: what about LDAP support in GnuPG?

2004-10-22 Thread Volker Quetschke
Hi Lapo, Volker, did you think about adding it? That way, LDAP-based keyserver can be contacted. All that is required to have the support is to have openldap-devel installed at compile-time: GnuPG's configure will auto-detect and use it. I'm overdue with gnupg 1.2.6 anyway, yes it will contain

Re: Still hosed by setup problem

2004-10-22 Thread Bas van Gompel
Op Tue, 12 Oct 2004 18:55:25 -0400 schreef David A. Cobb in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: : Well, now I am completely out of business! : : This is more data regarding the URL Scheme Not Registered failure in : SETUP, last reports were around 9/18. : : In the last progress message posted before the