--- "Dr. Volker Zell" ha scritto:
> > Marco Atzeri writes:
>
> Also the cygwin README mentions:
>
> compiled with
>
> BLAS libraries: -llapack -lblas
> FFTW libraries: -lfftw3
> GLPK libraries: -lglpk
> UMFPACK libraries:-lumfpack
> AMD libraries:-la
Mark Harig schrieb:
Reini Urban wrote:
New is to build only a subset of the modules
cygmake "MODULES=${MODULES}"
And build the rest for the three seperate packages extra with the
clisp-linkkit.
Just so I understand, this will allow clisp to be built without the GUI
modules?
Off-topic: No
Reini Urban wrote:
New is to build only a subset of the modules
cygmake "MODULES=${MODULES}"
And build the rest for the three seperate packages extra with the
clisp-linkkit.
Just so I understand, this will allow clisp to be built without the GUI
modules?
Off-topic: Not to be picky, but 's
Mark Harig schrieb:
I wrote:
There appears to be a contradiction between the Cygwin announcement
and the upstream clisp announcement. The upstream announcement states
that the configuration option '--with-dynamic-ffi' has been replaced by
the option '--with-ffcall', but the Cygwin announcement
Mark Harig schrieb:
In the file /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/clisp-xx.README is the
following information:
> Runtime recommendations: (-k full)
> fgci
> libdb4.5
> libgdbm4
> libpq4
Is the 'libpq4' run-time recommendation going to be changed
to 'libpq5'?
Yes. But the file will still be /bin
Mark Harig schrieb:
Mark Harig wrote:
> Build requirements:
> libsigsegv
> and the usual build tools
I attempted to generate the Cygwin clisp package using:
$ cygport /usr/src/clisp-2.xx.cygport prep compile
This required multiple passes (using 'cygport ... finish' to
remove each earli
> Marco Atzeri writes:
> Dear All,
> as it is my first tentative to adopt a package
> I hope to have understood cleary the rules
> :-o
> I ported Octave to cygport build and simplified
> the packages to just octave and octave-devel.
> Previous split was:
> o
> Uploaded with a minor change. You left a single quote in the ldesc
> accidentally:
>
> ldesc: "'atool [...]
> ^
> here.
>
> I removed it. If that was wrong, I'll revert it. If it was ok, please
> fix in your local copy.
Yes, that's correct. Thanks. Andrew.
Dear Corinna,
thanks very much for the feedback.
--- Corinna Vinschen ha scritto:
> On Feb 7 10:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> > The packaging looks basically ok to me. I like
> the simplification into
> > base and devel package. However,
> >
> > - the setup.hint file of the -devel pack
On Feb 7 12:50, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> Corinna approved my atool package, subject to one correction in setup.hint,
> which I've made. Please upload. Thanks, Andrew.
>
> wget \
> http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/atool/setup.hint \
> http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/atool/atool-0
Corinna approved my atool package, subject to one correction in setup.hint,
which I've made. Please upload. Thanks, Andrew.
wget \
http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/atool/setup.hint \
http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/atool/atool-0.33.0-1.tar.bz2 \
http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/c
> Packaging looks fine to me, just your setup.hint file has a quoting
> problem in the ldesc field (single instead of double quotes, double
> quotes within).
I was hoping that by single-quoting the field contents, I'd be able to keep the
double quotes within it. The web site isn't explicit about
Mark Harig wrote:
> Build requirements:
> libsigsegv
> and the usual build tools
I attempted to generate the Cygwin clisp package using:
$ cygport /usr/src/clisp-2.xx.cygport prep compile
This required multiple passes (using 'cygport ... finish' to
remove each earlier pass) because addi
I wrote:
There appears to be a contradiction between the Cygwin announcement
and the upstream clisp announcement. The upstream announcement states
that the configuration option '--with-dynamic-ffi' has been replaced by
the option '--with-ffcall', but the Cygwin announcement states that the
no-l
In the file /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/clisp-xx.README is the
following information:
> Runtime recommendations: (-k full)
> fgci
> libdb4.5
> libgdbm4
> libpq4
Is the 'libpq4' run-time recommendation going to be changed
to 'libpq5'?
> Build requirements:
> libsigsegv
> and the usual build to
On Feb 7 10:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> On Feb 4 15:03, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > http://matzeri.altervista.org/cygwin/octave/setup.hint
> > http://matzeri.altervista.org/cygwin/octave/octave-3.0.0-1-src.tar.bz2
> > http://matzeri.altervista.org/cygwin/octave/octave-3.0.0-1.tar.bz2
Hi Andrew,
On Feb 5 13:29, Andrew Schulman wrote:
>
> sdesc: "Script for managing file archives of various types"
> ldesc: 'atool is a script for managing file archives of various types
> (tar, tar+gzip, zip, bzip2, rar, 7zip, ...). atool is called under
> several names:
>
> * aunpack extracts
Hi Marco,
On Feb 4 15:03, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> http://matzeri.altervista.org/cygwin/octave/setup.hint
> http://matzeri.altervista.org/cygwin/octave/octave-3.0.0-1-src.tar.bz2
> http://matzeri.altervista.org/cygwin/octave/octave-3.0.0-1.tar.bz2
> http://matzeri.altervista.org/cygwin/octave/octave
18 matches
Mail list logo
