>
> Please verify that you actually have mingw64-i686 installed. Telling us
> what you have done doesn't really help. We need to know what's on your
> system.
>
> http://cygwin.com/problems.html
I do not see any single mingw64-i686 package...
Does the following represent what you are talking abou
On Jun 25 13:09, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 01:37:02PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >since 1.7 we don't use the registry for mount points anymore.
> >Nevertheless, setup.exe, as well as the cygwin package postinstall
> >script 000-cygwin-post-install.sh still
On Jun 26 08:46, d_h...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >
> > Please verify that you actually have mingw64-i686 installed. Telling us
> > what you have done doesn't really help. We need to know what's on your
> > system.
> >
> > http://cygwin.com/problems.html
>
> I do not see any single mingw64-i686 package
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 02:47:15PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Jun 26 08:46, d_h...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> >
>> > Please verify that you actually have mingw64-i686 installed. Telling us
>> > what you have done doesn't really help. We need to know what's on your
>> > system.
>> >
>> > http://c
> I worked around our older mingw-w64 toolchain in setup by changing the
> inclusion order in the affected source file. This makes sure that stdio.h
> is only included after the usual C++ suspects.
OK, I have verified that a build of HEAD I just obtained will (now) build under
recent cygwin and r
eanly.
>
> Patches need to be against CVS head.
>
Provided as attachments, HEAD as of some point 20130626...
include_source_D20120430_R2.774.patch.diff
Description: Binary data
include_source_patch_HEAD_circa20130626.diff
Description: Binary data
t;>>
>>>It will almost apply to head around 20130619, but a second version is
>>>provided to do that cleanly.
>>
>> Patches need to be against CVS head.
>>
>
>Provided as attachments, HEAD as of some point 20130626...
>
>>Provided as attachments, HEAD as of some point 20130626...
>
> Again, we don't care about patches against old versions and you should
> include a ChangeLog:
initial attempt at ChangeLog entry (diff attached)
(Original
