> From: Sam Steingold
> Sent: Saturday, 6 September 2003 6:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: new package proposal: CLISP
> I created a new package: CLISP (http://clisp.cons.org)
I would like to see this included. I use clisp compiled maxima
under cygwin.
BTW: Does it pass it's regression
> From: Sam Steingold
> Sent: Saturday, 6 September 2003 6:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: new package proposal: CLISP
>
> I created a new package: CLISP (http://clisp.cons.org)
>
> ftp://ftp2.cons.org/pub/lisp/clisp/binaries/latest/cygwin/clisp-2.31-1.tar.bz2
> ftp://ftp2.cons.org/pub/li
> From: Sam Steingold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 18 September 2003 7:26 AM
> To: Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)
> Subject: Re: new package proposal: CLISP
> maybe you could be interested in maintaining cygwin packages of both
> CLISP and Maxima? it appear
> From: Harold L Hunt II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 3 December 2003 7:28 PM
>
> I would like to contribute and maintain ImageMagick:
>
> Question for other maintainers: ImageMagick defaults to building as a
> static library... I have not yet tried to build it as a shared library;
> From: Harold L Hunt II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 4 December 2003 5:26 AM
> To: cygapps
> Subject: Re: [ITP] ImageMagick
>
>
> David,
>
> Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS) wrote:
>> I have built ImageMagick-5.5.3 as a shared library. It worked
> I want to contribute/maintain libwmf, the library for reading vector
> images Windøws Metafile Format (WMF).
I'd like to see this. I have been using the command line utils from
libwmf for a while.
> Package: libwmf-0.2.8.3-1
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-06/msg00058.html
> Votes : 2
> From : David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This works for me.
I have downloaded the source package, built it and installed it.
Layout looks OK, but
> Oh no, it requires openjade..
>
> Is there someone out there who is able to build the current version of
> openjade / opensp.
>
> Gerrit
There is http://www.flett.org/archives/2004/06/09/10.49.58/
From: Gerrit P. Haase
>> NETCDF support:no
>
>Can this be added? Do we need another external library for this?
> Where can I get the source?
http://my.unidata.ucar.edu/content/software/netcdf/index.html
__
NOTICE
> From: Harold L Hunt II
>
> The lesstif package was last built and released (0.93.94) with gcc-3.3.1
> (or earlier, not sure). Performing a rebuild of the lesstif source as
> released (or any lesstif version after that) results in a good build,
> but one that gives a "status access violation"
> From: Dave Korn
> >>
> >> I'm wondering if Dave Korn or Brian Dessent would consider
> maintaining gcc?
>
> Well I didn't finish rolling the lot over the weekend owing
> to reasons I'll
> explain on the talk list, but I'm saying yes anyway. First
> thing I'll do will
> be reroll a 3.4.4-2
The current cygwin version of gmp is 4.1.4. This also contains an old version
of mpfr. The latest version of gmp is 4.2. It no longer contains it own
vestion of mpfr.
I have packaged gmp-4.2 and mpfr-2.2.0. The current gmp maintainer Lapo Luchini
is happy for me to offer these for review and t
> From: Charles Wilson
>
> Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS) wrote:
>
> > The new cygmpfr1.dll is not binary compatible with the current cygmpfr0.dll.
> > How should this be managed? Should I provide a libmpfr0 package that just
> > contains the existing cygmpfr
The current cygwin version of gmp is 4.1.4. This also contains an old version
of mpfr. The latest version of gmp is 4.2.1 It no longer contains it own
version
of mpfr. I have packaged gmp-4.2.1 and mpfr-2.2.0. The current gmp maintainer
Lapo Luchini is happy for me to offer these for review and
> From: Corinna Vinschen
> I'm not using this so I can't test. The packaging looks good. But I don't
> think
> the gmp package should have libgmp-devel in its requirements. This
> contradicts the
> purpose of differing between runtime and devel packages. The devel package
> should
> only b
15 matches
Mail list logo
