Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.

mc -- GMX DSL = Maximale Leistung zum minimalen Preis! 2000 MB nur 2,99, Flatrate ab 4,99 Euro/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

Upload: mc-4.6.1-2

Hello, Yesterday, the MC developers (finally) released MC 4.6.1. I've prepared a new Cygwin package based on the official tarball. Please, upload. http://ptsekov.fixity.net/cygwin/mc-4.6.1-2-src.tar.bz2 http://ptsekov.fixity.net/cygwin/mc-4.6.1-2.tar.bz2 http://ptsekov.fixity.net/cygwin/setup.hin

Please upload: mc-4.6.1-1

Hello, MC 4.6.1-pre2 has been released. This will eventually become the official MC 4.6.1. Please, upload. http://ptsekov.gamersrevolt.it/cygwin/release/mc/mc-4.6.1-1-src.tar.bz2 http://ptsekov.gamersrevolt.it/cygwin/release/mc/mc-4.6.1-1.tar.bz2 http://ptsekov.gamersrevolt.it/cygwin/release/mc/

Re: [setup] [PATCH] Redirect stdin from /dev/null when running postinstall scripts

On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > Hi, > > The patch below redirects stdin from /dev/null when running postinstall > scripts, so that installation doesn't hang if a program called from a > postinstall script decides to ask the user something. AFAICS, this is > against the CVS HEAD.

Re: package list maintainer wanted (was Re: replacement for Elfyn?)

On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > If noone beats me I am willing to do this again. Uh, sorry - I was too fast repying. Pavel

Re: package list maintainer wanted (was Re: replacement for Elfyn?)

Hello, > We need someone (i.e., a volunteer) to maintain the list of pending > packages and to upload packages to sources.redhat.com. I'd be happy to > give access to sources.redhat.com to the appropriate person and to help > set up a tracking database, if necessary. Or, if we want to just do >

Re: HEADSUP: test packages

> Hi, > > a short `find' shows, that the following packages have "test" releases: > [snip] > - mc test: 4.6.0a-20030721-1 I will release an updated 'curr' version shortly. Pavel

Re: perl-5.8.1 test release

Hello, Running the following test perl.exe caused a crash in the the Cygwin dll: ../ext/threads/t/thread A previous one also also caused a crash but I didn't have Dr. Mingw installed still and couldn't get a backtrace. I think the name of the other test that crashed was again 'thread'. The crash

Re: perl-5.8.1 test release

>Hallo Pavel, > >> Running the following test perl.exe caused a crash in the the Cygwin dll: > >[...] > >Yep, there are two threads tests failing from the perl testsuite. I >havn't looked into this yet: If you havent started to debug don't bother - I've just finished debugging the problem. Just f

Attention perl maintainer: pp_system () implemented via do_aspawn () faster ?

Hello, The cygwin subdir in the perl source tree contains a set a functions named do_*spawn () which are based on the Cygwin spawnvp () call. That is presumably faster when all the parent wants to do is just start a new process that in unix would be accomplished by a call to fork () followed by e

Perl 5.8.1 crash description

Ok, here is my description of the problem. The following snippet of ext/thread/t/thread.t triggers the problem: { my $lock : shared; sub islocked { lock($lock); my $val = shift; my $ret; print $val; if (@_) { $ret = threads->new(\&islock

Re: Attention perl maintainer: pp_system () implemented via do_aspawn () faster ?

Christopher Faylor wrote: >>The cygwin subdir in the perl source tree contains a set a functions named >>do_*spawn () which are based on the Cygwin spawnvp () call. That is >>presumably faster when all the parent wants to do is just start a new >>process that in unix would be accomplished by a ca

Re: Perl 5.8.1 crash description

Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > And what is your oppinion (in one sentence) about the root of the> > problem? > > Is it a 'bug' in perl or a 'bug' in cygwin or is just that a perl > script never should do s.th. like this? Well, I don't feel like I am the one that can give advices on how to proceed. I

Possible setup bug: downloading wrong src packages

Robb, Sam wrote: > It looks like setup.exe is downloading the wrong source > packages if a package has a "test" entry in setup.ini. > You can confirm this by doing a default installation, > setting the installation type to "Download from Internet", > and asking setup to download the source packag

TEST: mc-4.6.0a-20030721-1

Hello, I've prepared the 64-bit test version of Midnight Commander. I took the opportunity to update the codebase from CVS since it has been almost 5 months since 4.6.0 was released. It seems that the internal viewer (invoked by pressing F3) causes a crash inside the guts of Cygwin, when used on

Re: [Updated package] mc-4.6.0-4

On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > PS- Shall I remove 4.6.0-3 ? Ooops! Kill everything except 4.6.0-4. 4.5.xx is too old to be useful. All 4.6.0-x up to -4 have this ftpfs bug.

[Updated package] mc-4.6.0-4

Hello, An updated Midnight Commander package is available. It addresses this problem: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-04/msg02119.html As I've already indicated on the main list this is a bug introduced by me and it is specific to the Cygwin version of MC. This version does *NOT* add

pavel is off

st ncurses library and I expect to do one more update once a 64-bit version of Cygwin is made available to the public. Finally, I'd like to thank you all - for working hard on a wonderful project, for the good time and many things I've learned here. Thanks! Pavel Tsekov P.S. Once I get

[Updated package] mc-4.6.0-3

Hello, I've rebuild MC against the new ncurses library. Please, upload. http://ptsekov.gamersrevolt.it/cygwin/release/mc/mc-4.6.0-3.tar.bz2 http://ptsekov.gamersrevolt.it/cygwin/release/mc/mc-4.6.0-3-src.tar.bz2 http://ptsekov.gamersrevolt.it/cygwin/release/mc/setup.hint

Re: What does wrap mean?

Oh, boy :) Why do these setup discussions always take so long to settle down ?!

Re: [UPDATE] base-files

On Sun, 6 Apr 2003, John Morrison wrote: > Packages can be found at: > es-1.3-1.tar.bz2> > nt> >

Re: Please upload new version of curl (7.10.4-1)

On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Roth, Kevin P. wrote: > Would someone kindly upload a new version of curl > to the sourceware mirrors for me? [snip] > Please let me know once this has been completed so I can announce it. Done.

Re: swig-1.3.19-1: Ready for Upload

On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) wrote: > A new version of the SWIG package (swig-1.3.19-1) is ready for upload from > the following locations: > > Binary: http://home.ptd.net/~gwilliam/cygwin_swig/swig-1.3.19-1.tar.bz2 > Source: http://home.ptd.net/~gwilliam/cygwin_swig/swig-1.3.19

Please, send an announcement for package 'par'

On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:31:49PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > > >I second par. > > > > I'm in favor of this, too. > > Ok, that makes three votes

Re: Make a snapshot with set_default_sec disabled?

On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > Pavel Tsekov wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > > > >> I propose making a snapshot with set_default_sec commented out, in order > >> to see if that stops the crashes. OK, Robert? > >> > >

Re: Make a snapshot with set_default_sec disabled?

On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > I propose making a snapshot with set_default_sec commented out, in order to > see if that stops the crashes. OK, Robert? > > If so, do I need to put up a whole new source tarball, or is a patch > sufficient to satisfy the GPL? Is there something actually

Re: kerberos and cvs

On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Charles Wilson wrote: > However, here's the problem: >1) I know nothing about kerberos. I don't even know enough to test it. I use CVS at work with the gserver method i.e. GSS api. At least I have a setup where I can test your work. >2) I do NOT want to maintain thi

Pending packages status (31 Mar 2003) (update)

1. LPRng date : 21 Jan 2003 version: 3.8.19-1 status : reviewed; source package needs to be fixed notes : http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00215.html http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00172.html reviews: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00061

Re: Pending packages status (31 Mar 2003)

On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:31:49PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > >I second par. > > I'm in favor of this, too. Ok, that makes three votes so far - I've uploaded it. Lapo, please, send an announcement.

Re: perl-5.8.0-2 ready for upload (after review?)

On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > > Anyway, now perl is uploaded. I have removed the 'test' version. > > > Don't forget to send an announcement :) > > The requires: line also changed in both setup.hint files, did you see? I uploaded the setup.hint files provided on your site. And ye

Re: perl-5.8.0-2 ready for upload (after review?)

On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > >> perl-5.8.0-2 is ready for release, I think it should > >> be ok, but a short review doesn't hurt;) > > > Gerrit, is the download site working ? I tried both from my office and > > from sources.redhat.com and the download doesn't start. > > > Heck

Pending packages status (31 Mar 2003)

Hello, Since the list of pending packages is quite big now, I decided to remove nfs-server from it. It was taking a lot of space and now there is no activity on it anyway. Once Sam Robb gets back, I'll include nfs-server back in the list. 1. LPRng date : 21 Jan 2003 version: 3.8.19-1 status :

Re: perl-5.8.0-2 ready for upload (after review?)

On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Hallo Cygwinners, > > perl-5.8.0-2 is ready for release, I think it should > be ok, but a short review doesn't hurt;) Gerrit, is the download site working ? I tried both from my office and from sources.redhat.com and the download doesn't start.

Re: LibXML2 and LibXSLT

On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > Hello All, > > I have started working on these two packages but I have just taken a bit > more responsability at work for the next two weeks. This means that my > optimistic deadline of this week to release test packages will have to be > put forward.

Re: setup crashes - backtrace

On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Vince Hoffman wrote: > If this is usefull (unlikely as i'm no programmer but hey ;) > from gdb with the snapshot i got. > > (gdb) run > Starting program: /tmp/setup-2.340.2.3.exe > warning: LOG: 2 Starting cygwin install, version 2.340.2.3 > warning: LOG: 2 Current Directory:

Re: setup crashes - backtrace

On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > Here is the Dr. MinGW output for the at-startup crash being mentioned on > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > setup-2.340.2.3.debug.exe caused an Access Violation at location 78403330 > Reading from location 78403330. > > Registers: > eax=0077 ebx=0022f930 ecx

Re: zsh and MC was Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mc-4.6.0-1

Sorry, I meant this to go to the main list, but mistyped the address :(

Re: zsh and MC was Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mc-4.6.0-1

On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Peter A. Castro wrote: > > > > > 2. If you start mc under zsh in a *console* window with the command > > > > prompt option, no prompt is shown - just the cursor: > > > > "_" inst

Re: CMake 1.6.6-1

On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, William A. Hoffman wrote: > There has been a new release of the official cmake (1.6.6). > This is a minor release from 1.6.5 to 1.6.6. Uploaded. Please, send an announcement in a few hours.

Re: String and std::string

On 21 Mar 2003, Robert Collins wrote: > this may well. Look in the g++ library for freeze() (again, IIRC). The > thing I saw when I was reading the source, was that the internal buffer > was not delete[]'d once it was handed out via c_str(). That was with the > libstc++ for gcc 2.95 as well. I've

Re: String and std::string

On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Alex Tibbles wrote: > > I don't care whether you use std::string, or > > String++ for any new code, > > as long as: > > 1) You don't leak memory (std::string will leak if > > you use c_str()) > > IIRC. > > I've been unable to confirm this. I tried the attached > program (comp

Re: nano editor : v.1.2.0 released

On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 11:57:38AM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > >On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Gareth Pearce wrote: > > > >> A lil slow off the mark ... but here we go... > >> > >> http://www-personal.usyd.

Re: Unifying Exception types in setup

On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > > Btw I remember that Robert had some concerns about exceptions and > > mingw. The info should be in the archives. And I don't know if these > > problems still exist. > > No luck searching. "Exception" produces far too many useless hits. http://www.cygwi

Re: String and std::string

On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > >> Are there any features String has but std::string does not? > > > > Except for casecompare() I think not. Of course you can perform > > caseless comparison with std::string. It's just a bit tricky :). > > Hint: char_traits. > > What fun. I think it's

Re: String and std::string

On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > I've been toying with some ideas for UserSetting persistence in setup.conf, > and have run into the following issue: > > String, from String++.* lacks some functionality I need. std::string has the > necessary functionality. > > Is one of String and std:

Re: Unifying Exception types in setup

On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > > If you going to do this I suggest you to dereive a new class from > > exception or Exception, say FatalException. Then install a global > > handler, which catches FatalException and displays a message then > > exits. This way the exit call will be in a s

Re: nano editor : v.1.2.0 released

On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Gareth Pearce wrote: > A lil slow off the mark ... but here we go... > > http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/nano/nano-1.2.0-1.tar.bz2 > http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/nano/nano-1.2.0-1-src.tar.bz2 > http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/nano/setup.hint

Re: Unifying Exception types in setup

On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > Robert Collins wrote: > > Max Bowsher wrote: > >> Robert, > >> > >> Currently setup uses both exceptions, and its own > >> std::exception-derived Exceptions. > >> > >> I'm about to write a patch to convert the kludgy > >> > >> if (error) > >> exit(som

Re: [PATCH] Cleanup: Close handles in script.cc:run()

On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > The attached patch closes the unneeded handles in run() in script.cc. > Those handles should be closed according to > : if (b) WaitForSingleObject (pi.hProcess, INFINITE

RE: Pending setup patches (issue 10)

On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, John Morrison wrote: > > Still, I strongly favour reliability over speed in this case. > > It takes longer than that over a network :( > Which is how cygwin is installed at work. Don't get me wrong, md5sum > is something which needs doing, just (IMHO) not necessary *each* ti

Re: Pending setup patches (issue 10)

On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > > What about the particulary nasty bug, when you set packages to 'keep' > > in the 'partial view' and then cycle again to 'partial view' and this > > packages are still there ? > > > > There was another nasty one which I have seen some time ago > > (repea

Re: Pending setup patches (issue 10)

On 15 Mar 2003, Robert Collins wrote: > On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 23:42, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > > > > > > No last minute bugs anyone is aware of? > > > > Are you talking about HEAD ? > > Yes. What about the particulary nasty bug, when you set packages to 

Re: Pending setup patches (issue 10)

On 15 Mar 2003, Robert Collins wrote: > On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 23:02, Max Bowsher wrote: > > Goodbye generated files! > > * Remove autotool-generated files from CVS > > No objections received. > > Robert, you can zap them at your leisure! > > zappity do dah. Ok, everyone, you'll need to bootstraph

Re: Ok, to upload grace ? was Re: Pending packages status (10 Mar2003)

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > > In that case: > > > > Ready for upload to s.r.c as soon as someone with the relevant permissions > > has a moment. > > > > BTW, keep the URLs in the message: > > http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.12-1.tar

Ok, to upload grace ? was Re: Pending packages status (10 Mar 2003)

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > Volker Quetschke wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hi! > > > >> Actually, maybe the postinstall *should* use -e, not -f - just in > >> case someone wants to do some symlink trickery. > > > > Changed and uploaded! > > In

Re: New release of setup.exe (2.249.2.10)

Wrong list ? On 13 Mar 2003, Robert Collins wrote: > I'm happy to announce a new release of setup.exe. This version will > correctly set permissions for use with the ntsec setting of cygwin, > which is the default now. Additionally it allows the use of http proxies > that require a username with

Re: nasm-0.98.36-1

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Dean Scarff wrote: > This is the new version of nasm, released on sf March 13. The pdf issue from the > 0.98.35 port is still current: again the pdf has been ommitted. > > setup.hint: > http://www.polarhome.com:753/~p00ya/up/setup.hint > src package: > http://www.polarhome.

Re: Fixed patch for install.cc

On 13 Mar 2003, Robert Collins wrote: > Applied, thank you. > I made a small tweak to the code there at the same time, to eliminate > do_skip. It's good practice to use a query method where possible, as > this makes the semantic clearer to a casual reader (modulo the clarity > of the method names)

Re: LPRng issues (fwd)

On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > > What about including a directory named CYGWIN-PATCHES in the source > > tarball ? It should include the setup.hint file and the README file. > > This will require a patch I guess. > > > > If I am wrong, please, someone correct me. > > You are not wrong,

Re: LPRng issues (fwd)

On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 22:20:52 -0500 (EST) > From: Brian Gallew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: LPRng issues > > I tried to reply to the list a couple of times

LPRng issues (fwd)

-- Forwarded message -- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 22:20:52 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Gallew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LPRng issues I tried to reply to the list a couple of times, but qmail is rejecting my messages. Therefore I'm replying (sorta) directly to you

Re: Fixed patch for install.cc

Ping ? On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote: > > > > * Pavel's "Do not uninstall if upgrade package fails md5" patch > > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00178.html >

Pending packages status (10 Mar 2003)

1. grace date : 25 Nov 2002 version: 5.1.12-1 status : updated package available for review notes : http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00322.html reviews: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00254.html votes : 2 (Lapo and Robert) url: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/gr

Fixed patch for install.cc

patch. > You'll need to submit a patch to add and use IDS_CRC_ERROR with whatever > text you intended. See attached. There was a small bug in the previous patch. A fix is also included. Changelog entry: 2003-03-09 Pavel Tsekov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * install.cc (do_ins

Re: LPRng was Re: Pending packages status

On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: Max: > >> IMO, a simple bootstrap.sh containing the appropriate autotool > >> commands would be better. > >> > > Earnie: > > A source release for a binary package isn't supposed to require > > autotools. IIRC, this is GNU standards mandated; if not it cert

Re: when is next release of setup.exe

On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > >> Neither will work. > >> 2.249.2.5 won't compile with gcc3, or with gcc2 from a gcc2 package. > >> It only works with the ancient gcc2 packaged as gcc. > > > > Yes. Right. Obviously if linda have followed the recent threads she > > could avoid build probl

Re: when is next release of setup.exe

On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > linda w (cyg) wrote: > > Compiling from a branch? How did I manage that? > > The setup source tarball you are using originated from the setup-200206 > branch. > > > I just have 'gcc' downloaded -- If I install the gcc2 package will > > the ./configure sc

RE: when is next release of setup.exe

On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, linda w (cyg) wrote: > Compiling from a branch? How did I manage that? I am a mindreader isn't it that what you've expected ? To answer the question - I didn't read your email till the end because I recognized the problem when I looked at the error messages. It is not a go

LPRng was Re: Pending packages status

On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > > 3. LPRng > > > > date : 21 Jan 2003 > > version: 3.8.19-1 > > status : reviewed; updated package available > > notes : http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00215.html > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg0

RE: when is next release of setup.exe

You've obviously compiling from a branch. Branched setup is not gcc3 ready. Install gcc-2 package and use gcc-2 + g++-2 to compile setup.exe. On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, linda w (cyg) wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Igor Pechtchanski > > > Cygwin setup compiles fine with Cygwin gcc. >

Re: Pending packages status

On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Charles Wilson wrote: > Yep, IIRC it *was* Pavel's personal preference. It cetainly isn't mine. > I agree with Max: packages should be uniquely identified, to avoid > confusion *during the prerelease phase*. Imagine: > > "Bob, there's a proplem with your foo-1.3.2-1 pack

Pending packages status

1. grace date : 25 Nov 2002 version: 5.1.10-1 status : not reviewed notes : http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00322.html votes : 2 (Lapo and Robert) url: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.10-1.tar.bz2 http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.10-1-src.tar.bz2

Re: tetex-2.0.2-1

On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > This is a bugfix release. It includes upstream bugfixes, packaging fixes > and textmode mount fixes for xdvi+t1lib. > > Please upload. > > As the curr/prev entries suggest, please remove last week's tetex-*2.0.1-1* > packages. > > I hope that I

Re: Pending packages status

On 6 Mar 2003, Robert Collins wrote: > On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 22:00, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Daniel Bößwetter wrote: > > > > > Pavel Tsekov wrote: > > > > > > >No. You should not touch this number until the first release of yo

Re: Pending packages status

On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Daniel Bößwetter wrote: > Pavel Tsekov wrote: > > >No. You should not touch this number until the first release of your > >package is out. Please, rename the package files. > > > > > As you wish. I changed all occurences back to 1, the

Re: Pending packages status

On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Daniel Bößwetter wrote: > Hi Danilo & *, > > I've got a new release of TCM/Cygwin (source and binary) that can be > found here: > > http://www.in.tum.de/~boesswet/tcm_cygwin.html > > Due to some changes I made, I inremented the patch-level (to 2). Pavel, > would you please

Pending packages status

1. grace date : 25 Nov 2002 version: 5.1.10-1 status : not reviewed notes : http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00322.html votes : 2 (Lapo and Robert) url: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.10-1.tar.bz2 http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.10-1-src.tar.bz2

Re: Request #2 to add a new package: ccdoc

On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Joe Linoff wrote: > I apologize for that oversight, I inadvertently reversed the vendor and patch > directories when building the patch file. It is now fixed and the updated files > are in http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin_tmp/ccdoc-0.8.39-1 Everything seems fine now. I gue

Re: Cygwin setup crashes

On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > > Actually this patch was never applied correctly to cvs. Here is my > > original post with the correct patch: > > > > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-07/msg00049/compress_gz.cc.pat > ch > > Looks like a botched application of the patch. I

Re: Cygwin setup crashes

On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > Now i see something really interesting. The patch the I wanted to be > backported to 200206, seems to be applied incorrectly to HEAD. I think > this is the real cause of the problem. Actually this patch was never applied correctly to cvs. H

Re: Cygwin setup crashes

On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > > Call stack: > > 00406816 SETUP.EXE:00406816 compress_gz::destroy() > > compress_gz.cc:472 ... > > free (outbuf); > >if (original) > >> delete original; > > } > > Interesting indeed. Something very weird is happening, if a non-null pointe

Re: Please upload this new pdksh (was: Re: Ok, to upload pdksh ?)

On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > > > <http://twoducks.exposure.org.uk/elfyn/cygwin/pdksh/pdksh-5.2.14-2-src.tar.b > > z2> > > <http://twoducks.exposure.org.uk/elfyn/cygwin/pdksh/pdksh-5.2.14-2.tar.bz2>

Re: Please upload this new pdksh (was: Re: Ok, to upload pdksh ?)

On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > z2> > > > > Please upload. Cheers

Re: Ok, to upload pdksh ? was Re: pdksh package proposal

On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > > Ok, I've just uploaded it. Elfyn, please send an announcement to > > cygwin-announce in a couple of hours. > > > Woo ho! :-) Sorry I have only just awoke but will start on an > announcement right away. No need to hurry, take your time :)

Re: Ok, to upload pdksh ? was Re: pdksh package proposal

On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > > z2> > > > > > > > > > >

Please, backport compress_gz.cc patch for setup-200206 branch wasRe: ntsec patch for setup

On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > I also propose this patch to be backported to the 200206 branch. It helps > in cases where one does a new install and install a lot of packages. > > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/setup/compress_gz.cc.diff?r1=2.5&r2=2.

Re: Request #2 to add a new package: ccdoc

On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Joe Linoff wrote: > > > You can find the updated package distribution files here: > > > > > > http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin_tmp/ccdoc-0.8.39-1 > > > > Ok, seems good now. There a still two problems though: > > > > 1) The files in the binary package should be installe

Ok, to upload pdksh ? was Re: pdksh package proposal

On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > Sorry I have been and still am pretty ill and a lot of things are slipping > through the net. I have fixed the typo in the README and re-generated the > patch, tested thoroughly and the patch now works :-) The updated files are > available here > >

Re: ntsec patch for setup

On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > > 2) gcc2 (not g++2) chokes on some lines in /usr/include/mingw/string.h. I > > had to patch as below, adding prototypes before the functions declared > > inline. > > There are also some complaints about autoload.c. Will see what

Re: ntsec patch for setup

On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > I've built setup from 200206 with ntsec patch as backported by Pavel. I ran > into other problems: > > 1) I had to merge these fixes, which enable building of setup with gcc-2. > cvs upd -kk -j2.22 -j2.23 Makefile.am > cvs upd -kk -j2.84 -j2.85 Makefile.i

[PATCH] setup-200206: Do not create /etc/postinstall/passwd-grp.bat

>From the ChangeLog entry for version 2.34 of desktop.cc: * desktop.cc (etc_profile): Remove. (make_etc_profile): Remove. (uexists): Remove. (make_passwd_group): Remove. (do_desktop_setup): Don't call removed functions. Index: desktop.cc

Re: ntsec patch for setup

On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > Robert Collins wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 22:44, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > >> Here is the same patch modified to be applied on main.cc from > >> setup-200207 branch. > > > > This looks reasonable. Pavel, if you

Re: ntsec patch for setup

On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > Robert Collins wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 22:44, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > > > Here is the same patch modified to be applied on main.cc from > > > setup-200207 branch. > > > > This looks reason

Re: Request #2 to add a new package: ccdoc

On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Joe Linoff wrote: > You can find the updated package distribution files here: > > http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin_tmp/ccdoc-0.8.39-1 Ok, seems good now. There a still two problems though: 1) The files in the binary package should be installed in /usr/bin, /usr/man a

Re: ntsec patch for setup

Here is the same patch modified to be applied on main.cc from setup-200207 branch. On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > This is the patch mentioned in the previous e-mail. I seems > to work fine on NT and an early version was tested on 2000 (there > are differences). > > Essentially

Pending packages status

1. grace date : 25 Nov 2002 version: 5.1.10-1 status : not reviewed notes : http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00322.html votes : 2 (Lapo and Robert) url: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.10-1.tar.bz2 http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.10-1-src.tar.bz2

Re: Request #2 to add a new package: ccdoc

I've made a brief review of the packaging, but not the functionality. Here is a list of problems that need to be fixed: 1) The source package includes files/dirs left by tools like autoconf and configure. These need to be removed. I see there is no 'distclean' stage in you Makefile, so I guess t

RE: Can't install cygwin using setup - says completed sucessfully but no bin or var directories

On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Tom Gilbert wrote: > Hi Christopher, > > Thanks very much for replying. > > >> Note that the CygWin setup MADE NO ATTEMPT TO DETECT THIS!!! > > Calm down. Actually, Cygwin setup did detect this. The OpenSSH > > installation apparently screwed up your mount table. > > Sorr

Re: Pending packages status (fwd)

It seems like you've replied only to me and not the list. I'm forwarding you message there. -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 11:42:26 +0100 From: Volker Quetschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Pavel Tsekov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Pending pac

Re: lilypond-1.6.8-2

On 27 Feb 2003, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > This is documentation build fix; most of the documentation did not > build and was missing from -1. I'm a bit embarrassed to have > overlooked this. Uploaded. I've removed 1.6.8-1.

  1   2   3   4   >