RE: Setup.exe

Acck!! Sorry guys, I meant for this to go to Gary and only to Gary. My goof On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Prentis Brooks wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > > -- > > Gary R. Van Sickle > > Brewer. Patriot. > > Question Gary, your signature, does it b

RE: Setup.exe

ing: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Prentis Brooks | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 703-265-0914 | AIM: PrentisBrooks Senior System Administrator - Web Infrastructure & Security A knig

Re: TCP Wrappers

s will have to > maintain two APIs -- one for the DLL and one for the statlib, using > #ifndef WITH_LIBWRAP_DLL guards in tcpd.hblech) > > --Chuck > > -- Prentis Brooks | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 703-265-0914 | AIM: PrentisBrooks Senior System Administrator - Web Infrastructure &am

Re: TCP Wrappers

Yeah, my thoughts as well, we really don't want to deviate too far from the base package. Let me tinker and see how it works, will let you know what I find :) On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 10:21:20AM -0400, Prentis Brooks wrote: > > Ok, I

Re: TCP Wrappers

AM -0400, Prentis Brooks wrote: > > Thanks Corinna, I have already started looking at dll'izing the code. > > Will be working on it through the weekend on a virtual machine as I > > expect I will break things while trying to get it to work ;) I expect I > > should

Re: TCP Wrappers

e for work, moving, etc). Once I have it working with inetd, I will bundle it up and let you test with sshd. I am not wanting to dig through sshd for all the changes that may need to go there. On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 12:46:30PM -0400, Prentis Broo

Re: TCP Wrappers

ion between the client and server applications." category: Net requires: cygwin On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:23:35AM -0400, Prentis Brooks wrote: > > Ok, the packages are now ready for someone to upload them to the > > distribution.

TCP Wrappers

with trying to get a DLL version done, hopefully sooner than I got to this. Packages can be found at the following location: http://www.stonegard.com/cygwin/tcp_wrappers_7.6/ -- Prentis Brooks | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 703-265-0914 | AIM: PrentisBrooks Senior System Administrator - Web Infrastructure

Re: TCP Wrappers

everity > problem, and release -2 with the DLL. > > --Chuck > > Prentis Brooks wrote: > > > Wow, Thanks Chuck!! I really appreciate that, I will look for your > > email and then start work on the other changes this weekend. Should > > have something by Monday

Re: TCP Wrappers

Cool, hadn't read all of the replies before responding to your email. On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 02:53:23PM -0500, Prentis Brooks wrote: > >Ok, maybe I just misunderstood your replies to someone asking for > >dll'izatio

Re: TCP Wrappers

; are there to build/install the DLL version, but the > allow_severity/deny_severity problem I referred to in my earlier message > has to be fixed first, then you can uncomment the "hooks" in Makefile > and in the shell script. > > --Chuck > > > Prentis Brooks wr

Re: TCP Wrappers

main() in tcpd, tcpdmatch, > safe-finger, etc. > > And sshd. > > --Chuck > > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 12:37:25PM -0500, Prentis Brooks wrote: > > > >>I am willing to look into this, it currently does not use libt

Re: TCP Wrappers

2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 12:37:25PM -0500, Prentis Brooks wrote: > > I am willing to look into this, it currently does not use libtool, so I > > have a lot of mods to make that happen, if I understood cgf right. > > I don't remember saying this

Re: TCP Wrappers

5AM -0500, Prentis Brooks wrote: > > Hey Guys, what is the status of the TCP Wrapper upload? I got an email > > from Rob stating that he had problems getting to the files, I fixed the > > problem and responded, but no word since. > > I've uploaded it to the contrib are

TCP Wrappers

Hey Guys, what is the status of the TCP Wrapper upload? I got an email from Rob stating that he had problems getting to the files, I fixed the problem and responded, but no word since. -- Prentis Brooks | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 703-265-0914 | AIM: PrentisBrooks Senior System Administrator

TCP Wrappers (fwd)

Just checking, but were you able to get to the package? -- Prentis Brooks | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 703-265-0914 | AIM: PrentisBrooks Senior System Administrator - Web Infrastructure & Security A knight is sworn to valor. His heart knows only virtue. His blade defends the help

RE: TCP Wrappers

2002, Robert Collins wrote: > "Directory Listing Denied" > > Rob > > > -Original Message- > > From: Prentis Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 12:04 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: TCP Wrappers >

TCP Wrappers

Ok, that was two votes ;) I have been using the code for several months now, so I am pretty confident with it. The packages can be downloaded from http://www.stonegard.com/cygwin/ Let me know when you have gotten them, or should I get access to push them up myself somehow? -- Prentis Brooks

TCP Wrappers

Hey Chris, I didn't see any comments on the setup.hint, is what I have compliant? If so, can we consider the package ready for upload once Robert has time to get it? -- Prentis Brooks | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 703-265-0914 | AIM: PrentisBrooks Senior System Administrator

Re: tcp wrappers

aints from me. > > Nor from me. It was just a suggestion. I don't think I've ever seen > a shared version of libwrap, actually. > > cgf > I am still open to looking at what it takes to DLL'ize the lib, and willing to test it to see what gains we get from it... wh

Re: tcp wrappers

it to make use of host.allow files). On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Charles Wilson wrote: > Prentis Brooks wrote: > > > >>Hmm. I wonder if it would be worthwhile to make the wrapper library a > >>DLL. > >> > > > > I would rather we didn't, primar

Re: tcp wrappers

On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 10:09:57AM -0500, Prentis Brooks wrote: > >Ok, gang, > > I finally got the time to finish up the build so that I had all > > the pieces defined in the contributor's document. It is no

Re: tcp wrappers

with the client or server applications, and impose no overhead on the actual conversation between the client and server applications." category: Net requires: cygwin On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 10:09:57AM -0500, Prentis Brooks wrote: > >Ok

tcp wrappers

Ok, gang, I finally got the time to finish up the build so that I had all the pieces defined in the contributor's document. It is now ready for upload. -- Prentis Brooks | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 703-265-0914 | AIM: PrentisBrooks Senior System Administrator

Re: Cleaned up setup.hint for tcp_wrappers

Yes, but I sent this before I got his ;)... classic case of emails passing on the ether ;) On Friday 08 February 2002 05:06 pm, you wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 01:35:45PM -0500, Prentis Brooks wrote: > >Ok, after some reviewing, here is what I have: > > > ># TCP Wrapp

Re: TCP Wrappers

Thanks Chuck, If you don't mind my cut and paste with little to no modifications, I will take your suggestions, they sound better than my last clean up. On Thursday 07 February 2002 01:53 pm, Charles Wilson wrote: > Prentis Brooks wrote: > > Alright, > > finally read

Cleaned up setup.hint for tcp_wrappers

p the src and binary packages, should have them available for retrieval sometime tomorrow -- Prentis Brooks | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 703-265-0914 | AIM: PrentisBrooks Senior System Administrator - Web Infrastructure & Security A knight is sworn to valor. His heart knows only virtue.

TCP Wrappers

. Feedback appreciated. -- Prentis Brooks | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 703-265-0914 | AIM: PrentisBrooks Senior System Administrator - Web Infrastructure & Security A knight is sworn to valor. His heart knows only virtue. His blade defends the helpless. His word speaks only truth.