> > But, in the meantime, could we get some gold stars for this? This
> > is a significant achievement.
>
> Jon already got a gold star for taking over w32api. But this is *still*
> a significant achievement, so we probably should take another one out of
> the vault for Jon.
Awarded. Don't wor
On 10/19/2012 00:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 18 11:19, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:32:00PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Oct 18 17:21, JonY wrote:
On 10/18/2012 16:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 17 23:09, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>> On
On Oct 18 11:19, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:32:00PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Oct 18 17:21, JonY wrote:
> >> On 10/18/2012 16:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> > On Oct 17 23:09, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 06:17 +0800, JonY wrote:
>
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:32:00PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Oct 18 17:21, JonY wrote:
>> On 10/18/2012 16:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> > On Oct 17 23:09, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 06:17 +0800, JonY wrote:
>> >>> OK, renamed, I hope I did not mess it up this ti
On Oct 18 17:21, JonY wrote:
> On 10/18/2012 16:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Oct 17 23:09, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 06:17 +0800, JonY wrote:
> >>> OK, renamed, I hope I did not mess it up this time.
> >>>
> >>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin
On 10/18/2012 16:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 17 23:09, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 06:17 +0800, JonY wrote:
>>> OK, renamed, I hope I did not mess it up this time.
>>>
>>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-headers/setup.hi
On Oct 17 23:09, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 06:17 +0800, JonY wrote:
> > OK, renamed, I hope I did not mess it up this time.
> >
> > https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-headers/setup.hint
> > https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 06:17 +0800, JonY wrote:
> OK, renamed, I hope I did not mess it up this time.
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-headers/setup.hint
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-headers/w32a
On 10/17/2012 17:23, JonY wrote:
> On 10/17/2012 16:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> In fact, you already set a precedent with your mingw packages, Jon. We
>> have mingw64-headers and mingw64-runtime packages. I'm not *that* sure
>> about the runtime name, but a consistent naming sounds like a good
On 10/17/2012 16:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 16 20:02, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>> On Sat, 2012-10-13 at 13:36 +0800, JonY wrote:
>>> I decided do a simpler split out version due to the way the source package
>>> is built, with w32api as a meta package.
>>> If required I can redo it into
On Oct 16 20:02, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-10-13 at 13:36 +0800, JonY wrote:
> > I decided do a simpler split out version due to the way the source package
> > is built, with w32api as a meta package.
> > If required I can redo it into a single package.
> >
> > Preference? Comments?
On Oct 17 06:43, JonY wrote:
> On 10/17/2012 06:19, JonY wrote:
> > On 10/16/2012 23:32, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>
> >> Are you waiting for more feedback or shall we upload? Are you mentally
> >> and ethically prepared to take the loads of complaints on the Cygwin ML?
> >>
> >
> > It's good to
On Sat, 2012-10-13 at 13:36 +0800, JonY wrote:
> I decided do a simpler split out version due to the way the source package
> is built, with w32api as a meta package.
> If required I can redo it into a single package.
>
> Preference? Comments?
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/
On 10/17/2012 06:19, JonY wrote:
> On 10/16/2012 23:32, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>
>> Are you waiting for more feedback or shall we upload? Are you mentally
>> and ethically prepared to take the loads of complaints on the Cygwin ML?
>>
>
> It's good to go if the Cygwin maintainers are OK with spl
On 10/16/2012 23:32, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 16 18:05, JonY wrote:
>> On 10/14/2012 02:12, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:45:43PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:28:42AM +0800, JonY wrote:
> On 10/14/2012 00:08, Corinna Vinsche
On Oct 16 18:05, JonY wrote:
> On 10/14/2012 02:12, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:45:43PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:28:42AM +0800, JonY wrote:
> >>> On 10/14/2012 00:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Sounds really interesting. I ju
On 10/14/2012 02:12, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:45:43PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:28:42AM +0800, JonY wrote:
>>> On 10/14/2012 00:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Sounds really interesting. I just tried it, but it fails to download
>
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:45:43PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:28:42AM +0800, JonY wrote:
>>On 10/14/2012 00:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> Sounds really interesting. I just tried it, but it fails to download
>>> the w32api-libs and w32api-includes packages:
>>>
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:28:42AM +0800, JonY wrote:
>On 10/14/2012 00:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> Sounds really interesting. I just tried it, but it fails to download
>> the w32api-libs and w32api-includes packages:
>>
>> generating package name -> package directory mapping...
>> Done
>> cou
On 10/14/2012 00:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Sounds really interesting. I just tried it, but it fails to download
> the w32api-libs and w32api-includes packages:
>
> generating package name -> package directory mapping...
> Done
> couldn't find a package dir for
> http://sourceforge.net/projec
On Oct 13 11:47, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 05:37:01PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Oct 13 13:36, JonY wrote:
> >> On 10/12/2012 18:57, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 18:27 +0800, JonY wrote:
> >> >> Any thoughts on if I should put up multilib
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 05:37:01PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Oct 13 13:36, JonY wrote:
>> On 10/12/2012 18:57, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 18:27 +0800, JonY wrote:
>> >> Any thoughts on if I should put up multilib w32api?
>> >> I'm having second thoughts now since I
On Oct 13 13:36, JonY wrote:
> On 10/12/2012 18:57, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 18:27 +0800, JonY wrote:
> >> Any thoughts on if I should put up multilib w32api?
> >> I'm having second thoughts now since I realize you can't simply build
> >> them with ootb Cygwin tools.
> >
On 10/12/2012 18:57, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 18:27 +0800, JonY wrote:
>> Any thoughts on if I should put up multilib w32api?
>> I'm having second thoughts now since I realize you can't simply build
>> them with ootb Cygwin tools.
>
> Not only that, but they are also useles
24 matches
Mail list logo
