Ping...
Igor
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On 26 Mar 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 02:11, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Do I need to regenerate this against HEAD once Max checks
in the postinstall thread patch?
Yes, and I'll review it then.
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 02:42, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Ping...
Igor
Pong.
Uhmm, try_run_script is always called with to_log true. So, why have the
parameter there at all?
Rob
--
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 08:02, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On 1 Apr 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 02:42, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Ping...
Igor
Pong.
Uhmm, try_run_script is always called with to_log true. So, why have the
parameter there at all?
Rob
On 1 Apr 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 08:02, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On 1 Apr 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
Uhmm, try_run_script is always called with to_log true. So, why have the
parameter there at all?
Rob
Umm, for symmetry? If you ever wanted to turn off
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 09:31, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Rob,
The reason I wanted to keep the to_log parameter is that I wanted to keep
the code around that directs output to console. If there are no
objections, I'll just make the default value of to_log TRUE, and remove
the third
On 1 Apr 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 09:31, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Rob,
The reason I wanted to keep the to_log parameter is that I wanted to keep
the code around that directs output to console. If there are no
objections, I'll just make the default value of
Umm... Ping?.. Do I need to regenerate this against HEAD once Max checks
in the postinstall thread patch? It should apply with fuzz even then.
Igor
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
This patch extends logging support to preremove/postremove scripts.
Igor
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 02:11, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Umm... Ping?.. Do I need to regenerate this against HEAD once Max checks
in the postinstall thread patch?
Yes, and I'll review it then.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
signature.asc
On 26 Mar 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 02:11, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Do I need to regenerate this against HEAD once Max checks
in the postinstall thread patch?
Yes, and I'll review it then.
Rob
Ok, here you go.
Igor
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
This patch extends logging support to preremove/postremove scripts.
Igor
=
Igor,
gave the patch a shot on my Win2k and Win95 laptops and reinstalling gcc-mingw
an inetutils and the Command window seems to be gone but other than the
reference to
Brian,
Replies inline below.
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Brian Keener wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
This patch extends logging support to preremove/postremove scripts.
Igor
=
Igor,
gave the patch a shot on my Win2k and Win95 laptops and reinstalling
gcc-mingw an
Igor,
My apologies - all is well - see below.
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the above, though - was the preremove script
logged or wasn't it? The gcc-mingw preremove script's output should
be the following one line: *** Removing gcc-mingw files. Please wait. ***
and
This patch extends logging support to preremove/postremove scripts.
Igor
==
2003-03-18 Igor Pechtchanski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* script.cc (try_run_script): Add optional to_log
boolean parameter.
13 matches
Mail list logo