> "cgf" == Christopher Faylor writes:
cgf> I haven't been paying close attention but perhaps this discussion should
cgf> be moved to the cygwin mailing list. This topic has been rehashed many
cgf> times there. If we haven't reached the point where we can actually *build*
cgf>
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 03:07:56PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Andreas Seidl wrote:
>
>> [snip]
>> Interestingly, gcc-3.2 has a hit, but *not* gcc-3.3:
>>
>> usr/include/gnu/gcj/convert/Input_iconv.h
>> usr/include/gnu/gcj/convert/Output_iconv.h
>>
>> And gcc-3.2-3.tar.bz2
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Andreas Seidl wrote:
> [snip]
> Interestingly, gcc-3.2 has a hit, but *not* gcc-3.3:
>
> usr/include/gnu/gcj/convert/Input_iconv.h
> usr/include/gnu/gcj/convert/Output_iconv.h
>
> And gcc-3.2-3.tar.bz2 is four times as big as gcc-3.3.1-3.tar.bz2.
Starting with gcc-3.3.1, the m
Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
As Igor already pointed out you haven't installed g++.
Try installing it and make a new release. I'll review that version.
Okay:
$ cygcheck -svr | grep gcc
Found: C:\cygwin\bin\gcc.exe
gcc 3.3.1-3
gcc-g++ 3.3.1-3
gcc-mingw-core 2
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
$ cygcheck -svr | grep gcc
Found: C:\cygwin\bin\gcc.exe
gcc 3.2-3
gcc-mingw-core 20031020-1
You're missing the gcc-g++ package. Install it, and you should be fine.
Okay:
$ cygcheck -svr | grep gcc
Found: C:\cygwin\bin\gcc.exe
gcc
> "Andreas" == Andreas Seidl writes:
Andreas> Volker,
Andreas> first of all many thanks for this in-depth review and for pointing out
Andreas> the sore spots.
okidoki
Andreas> $ cygcheck -svr | grep gcc
Andreas> Found: C:\cygwin\bin\gcc.exe
Andreas> gcc
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Andreas Seidl wrote:
> Volker,
>
> first of all many thanks for this in-depth review and for pointing out
> the sore spots.
>
> > The package is GOOD TO GO from my side if the following issues get
> > addressed. For your convinience I include a small patch at the end of
> > th
Volker,
first of all many thanks for this in-depth review and for pointing out
the sore spots.
The package is GOOD TO GO from my side if the following issues get
addressed. For your convinience I include a small patch at the end of
the mail which fixes the following
o remove empty /etc/postinst
Hi Andreas
The package is GOOD TO GO from my side if the following issues get
addressed. For your convinience I include a small patch at the end of
the mail which fixes the following
o remove empty /etc/postinstall directory
o Typos and missing/wrong requires in setup.hint/TeXmacs.README
I did
