Re: Attn: openldap maintainer

2004-08-19 Thread Reini Urban
Max Bowsher schrieb: Please rename your libopenldap2-2-15 package to libopenldap2_2_15 The dashes followed by digits in the name are making setup.exe confused about which part is the package name and which part is the version number. Shouldn't it be libopenldap-2.2.15? Official versions are

Re: Attn: openldap maintainer

2004-08-19 Thread Max Bowsher
Reini Urban wrote: Max Bowsher schrieb: Please rename your libopenldap2-2-15 package to libopenldap2_2_15 The dashes followed by digits in the name are making setup.exe confused about which part is the package name and which part is the version number. Shouldn't it be libopenldap-2.2.15? Official

Re: Attn: openldap maintainer

2004-08-19 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Max Bowsher writes: Please rename your libopenldap2-2-15 package to libopenldap2_2_15 The dashes followed by digits in the name are making setup.exe confused about which part is the package name and which part is the version number. Thanks for the catch. I would like to

Re: Attn: openldap maintainer

2004-08-19 Thread Max Bowsher
Dr. Volker Zell wrote: Max Bowsher writes: Please rename your libopenldap2-2-15 package to libopenldap2_2_15 The dashes followed by digits in the name are making setup.exe confused about which part is the package name and which part is the version number. Thanks for the catch. I

Re: Attn: openldap maintainer

2004-08-19 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Max Bowsher writes: libopenldap2_2_7 , IMO. Base the package name on the DLL name, since if the dll name changes, linked applications will break (so a new package will be needed) and if the dll name doesn't change, then you won't be able to make a concurrently

Attn: openldap maintainer

2004-08-18 Thread Max Bowsher
Please rename your libopenldap2-2-15 package to libopenldap2_2_15 The dashes followed by digits in the name are making setup.exe confused about which part is the package name and which part is the version number. Max.