Re: ITP dos2unix 5.2.1-1

2011-03-17 Thread Erwin Waterlander
On 03/16/2011 10:38 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: Moved to main cygwin list for more feedback. Background: currently the following utilities unix2dos dos2unix u2d d2u are all provided by the cygutils package. They are, in fact, all hardlinks/copies of the same 'conv.e

Re: ITP dos2unix 5.2.1-1

2011-03-17 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 17:38 -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > So: I don't see any insurmountable problems with entirely replacing > cygutils' unix2dos/dos2unix/u2d/d2u programs with these other versions. > (I would hope that cygwin's package would provide a u2d.exe hardlinked > to unix2dos.exe, etc)

Re: ITP dos2unix 5.2.1-1

2011-03-16 Thread Charles Wilson
Moved to main cygwin list for more feedback. Background: currently the following utilities unix2dos dos2unix u2d d2u are all provided by the cygutils package. They are, in fact, all hardlinks/copies of the same 'conv.exe' program, developed specifically for cygwin.

Re: ITP dos2unix 5.2.1-1

2011-03-16 Thread Christian Franke
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 04:05:17PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: On 3/16/2011 3:32 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 08:29:51PM +0100, Christian Franke wrote: An alternative would be to modify cygutils+dos2unix packages such that t

Re: ITP dos2unix 5.2.1-1

2011-03-16 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 04:05:17PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >On 3/16/2011 3:32 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 08:29:51PM +0100, Christian Franke wrote: >>> An alternative would be to modify cygutils+dos2unix packages such that >>> the user can select the flavor of dos

Re: ITP dos2unix 5.2.1-1

2011-03-16 Thread Charles Wilson
On 3/16/2011 3:32 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 08:29:51PM +0100, Christian Franke wrote: >> An alternative would be to modify cygutils+dos2unix packages such that >> the user can select the flavor of dos2unix/unix2dos commands with >> /usr/sbin/alternatives. If cygutils

Re: ITP dos2unix 5.2.1-1

2011-03-16 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 08:29:51PM +0100, Christian Franke wrote: >Erwin Waterlander wrote: >> On 03/16/2011 04:49 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> >>> This is, again, something that you can't assume. We don't know how >>> people use these tools. So, if we do decide to make the switch, you >>> w

Re: ITP dos2unix 5.2.1-1

2011-03-16 Thread Christian Franke
Erwin Waterlander wrote: On 03/16/2011 04:49 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: This is, again, something that you can't assume. We don't know how people use these tools. So, if we do decide to make the switch, you will have to be dedicated to being active in responding to problem reports on the m

Re: ITP dos2unix 5.2.1-1

2011-03-16 Thread Erwin Waterlander
On 03/16/2011 04:49 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: This is, again, something that you can't assume. We don't know how people use these tools. So, if we do decide to make the switch, you will have to be dedicated to being active in responding to problem reports on the mailing list. And, if peop

Re: ITP dos2unix 5.2.1-1

2011-03-16 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 03:52:36PM +0100, Erwin Waterlander wrote: >On 03/16/2011 02:52 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: >> >> Then you're going to have to explain why the other implementation is >> better (not just "but that's the one the linux people use": cygwin is > >Hi Chuck, > >I think it's a good a

Re: ITP dos2unix 5.2.1-1

2011-03-16 Thread Erwin Waterlander
On 03/16/2011 02:52 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: Then you're going to have to explain why the other implementation is better (not just "but that's the one the linux people use": cygwin is Hi Chuck, I think it's a good argument. Most cygwin programs are ported from Unix/Linux. Scripts that come

Re: ITP dos2unix 5.2.1-1

2011-03-16 Thread Charles Wilson
On 3/16/2011 3:59 AM, Erwin Waterlander wrote: > dos2unix on cygwin is different, it is 'conv'. The implementation I > propose is used on major Linux distributions. You could keep 'conv' on > cygwin. I propose to obsolete the links dos2unix and unix2dos to conv, > and replace them with the dos2unix

Re: ITP dos2unix 5.2.1-1

2011-03-16 Thread Erwin Waterlander
On 03/15/2011 11:17 PM, Eric Blake wrote: dos2unix is already part of cygwin. 'cygcheck -p dos2unix' shows that it is part of cygutils, so I see no reason to repackage it as an alternative build. Hi, dos2unix on cygwin is different, it is 'conv'. The implementation I propose is used on majo

Re: ITP dos2unix 5.2.1-1

2011-03-15 Thread Eric Blake
On 03/15/2011 04:05 PM, Erwin Waterlander wrote: > Hi, > > I propose package 'dos2unix' for cygwin. Dos2unix is part of Fedora, > Suse, Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, Slackware, and Arch Linux. The homepage is > http://www.xs4all.nl/~waterlan/dos2unix.html dos2unix is already part of cygwin. 'cygcheck

ITP dos2unix 5.2.1-1

2011-03-15 Thread Erwin Waterlander
Hi, I propose package 'dos2unix' for cygwin. Dos2unix is part of Fedora, Suse, Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, Slackware, and Arch Linux. The homepage is http://www.xs4all.nl/~waterlan/dos2unix.html I have prepared packages which can be downloaded from http://www.xs4all.nl/~waterlan/cygwin/dos2unix/