-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
| The latest on coreutils is that it's still not ready to go mainstream
| (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-03/msg00150.html).
What is the current status on this? I still have it in my ITP queue and
my Bugzilla is starting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christopher Faylor wrote:
| On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 04:02:55PM -0500, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
|
|cgf wrote:
|
|
|I'd like to explore new methods for getting packages into the
|distribution, however.
|
|Possibly we need a gdb packages steering
On Apr 1 10:39, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
| The latest on coreutils is that it's still not ready to go mainstream
| (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-03/msg00150.html).
What is the current status on this? I
On Mar 28 17:24, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I can't speak for Corinna, but I would rather *not* have to be the bad
guy or a single (double?) point of contact. I would rather have more
community involvement. I'm already drowning in being the focal point
for most cygwin bugs with help from only
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 11:41:54AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 28 17:24, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I can't speak for Corinna, but I would rather *not* have to be the bad
guy or a single (double?) point of contact. I would rather have more
community involvement. I'm already drowning
cgf wrote:
I'd like to explore new methods for getting packages into the
distribution, however.
Possibly we need a gdb packages steering committee which decides on
these things. It could have rules like a package needs a simple
majority vote to be a candidate for inclusion. I'd envision seven
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 04:02:55PM -0500, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
cgf wrote:
I'd like to explore new methods for getting packages into the
distribution, however.
Possibly we need a gdb packages steering committee which decides on
these things. It could have rules like a package needs a simple
Yes, someone did. I have no problem with moving to a new installer
interface but, given the current level of development, I don't see who's
going to do the work. If we don't have a volunteer available to
do the work of adapting NSIS but we do have volunteers available to
keep setup.exe working
--- chris jefferson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, someone did. I have no problem with moving to a new installer
Has moving to one of the existing linux packaging systems been
considered? This would I think require changing cygwin so first you
download a minimum package that just includes
Is the ITP moratorium declared in
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-03/msg00036.html still in effect?
The latest on coreutils is that it's still not ready to go mainstream
(http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-03/msg00150.html).
Igor
--
http
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 03:05:11PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Is the ITP moratorium declared in
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-03/msg00036.html still in effect?
Nope. Daniel's back. Sorry that I never made that clear.
I'd like to explore new methods for getting packages
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 03:05:11PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Is the ITP moratorium declared in
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-03/msg00036.html still in effect?
Nope. Daniel's back. Sorry that I never made that clear.
I'd like to explore new methods for getting packages
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 03:05:11PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Is the ITP moratorium declared in
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-03/msg00036.html still in effect?
Nope. Daniel's back. Sorry that I never made that clear.
I'd also
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, GARY VANSICKLE wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 03:05:11PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
I'd also like to see a formal justification for why a package should be
included, remembering that we have a software web page at cygwin.com
which can be used to advertise
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 09:23:42PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 03:05:11PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Is the ITP moratorium declared in
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-03/msg00036.html still in effect
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 09:30:51PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, GARY VANSICKLE wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 03:05:11PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: I'd
also like to see a formal justification for why a package should be
included, remembering that we have a
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 09:23:42PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
How do you submit something now that
http://cygwin.com/ported.html doesn't contain any form ?
It never contained a form. You use the form on the main cygwin page.
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 03:27:01PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 03:05:11PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Is the ITP moratorium declared in
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-03/msg00036.html still in effect?
Nope. Daniel's back. Sorry that I never made
cgf wrote:
We've had a flood of package ITPs and a missing package maintainer.
I'm imposing a moratorium on ITPs for now.
Thank you!!! I was wondering when someone was going to stop the
insanity ;-).
Cheers,
Nicholas
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'm imposing a moratorium on ITPs for now.
Does this mean no new ITPs or does this even mean that ITPs which are
already in the pipeline are stalled?
Andreas.
--
http://www.fmi.uni-passau.de/~seidl/
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 01:02:48AM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
But taking a close look at article.db, it seems everything that goes to
ports.html was or is in index.html ?
articles.db is the master source for the software and news. You can
always check the web pages out via cvs if you
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 07:55:17PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 01:02:48AM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
But taking a close look at article.db, it seems everything that goes to
ports.html was or is in
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 01:02:48AM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
But taking a close look at article.db, it seems everything that goes to
ports.html was or is in index.html ?
articles.db is the master source for the software and news. You
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 07:55:17PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 01:02:48AM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
But taking a close look at article.db, it seems
We've had a flood of package ITPs and a missing package maintainer.
I'm imposing a moratorium on ITPs for now.
I think I'm beginning to detect the sign of breakage in the process and
possibly am detecting the fact that we are overloading setup.exe.
It is rather a shame that we have a package
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 03:56:13PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
[snip]
But it's also a shame that http://cygwin.com/ported.html contains so
many broken or outdated links. Can I go through it and submit a diff ?
You most certainly can.
Christopher Faylor wrote:
It is rather a shame that we have a package like coreutils going
unclaimed while people are busily proposing other packages which would
be of general utility to only a tiny percentage of cygwin users.
You did get a volunteer for coreutils when you asked:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 06:55:04PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
It is rather a shame that we have a package like coreutils going
unclaimed while people are busily proposing other packages which would
be of general utility to only a tiny percentage of cygwin users.
You did
Agreed 100%.
But it's also a shame that http://cygwin.com/ported.html
contains so many broken or outdated links. Can I go through it
and submit a diff ?
And maybe someone should make a cygwinfind.net,
cygwinpackages.net, or something outside Cywin to host such
packages.
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004,
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 03:56:13PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
[snip]
But it's also a shame that http://cygwin.com/ported.html contains so
many broken or outdated links. Can I go through
30 matches
Mail list logo
