New package behaviour of setup.ini

2008-09-09 Thread Dave Korn
I want to make /very/ sure of this, which is why I'm asking: If an entirely new package appears on the mirrors, setup.exe won't install it automatically, even if in the past you have maybe set the entire "Devel" category (as it happens to be in this case, but I could have said the entire top

Re: New package behaviour of setup.ini

2008-09-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 06:45:51PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: > > > I want to make /very/ sure of this, which is why I'm asking: > > If an entirely new package appears on the mirrors, setup.exe won't install >it automatically, even if in the past you have maybe set the entire "Devel" >category (as i

RE: New package behaviour of setup.ini

2008-09-09 Thread Dave Korn
Christopher Faylor wrote on 09 September 2008 18:51: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 06:45:51PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: > Btw, does this version remove the -mno-cygwin option? If so, I may have > to leave work early so that I can have a celebratory beverage. Sorry :( no beer for you today. It's a

Re: New package behaviour of setup.ini

2008-09-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:01:31PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote on 09 September 2008 18:51: >>On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 06:45:51PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >>Btw, does this version remove the -mno-cygwin option? If so, I may >>have to leave work early so that I can have a celebra

Re: New package behaviour of setup.ini

2008-09-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:35:23PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:01:31PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >>Christopher Faylor wrote on 09 September 2008 18:51: >>>On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 06:45:51PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >>>Btw, does this version remove the -mno-cygwin optio

RE: New package behaviour of setup.ini

2008-09-10 Thread Dave Korn
Christopher Faylor wrote on 09 September 2008 19:59: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:35:23PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:01:31PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >>> Christopher Faylor wrote on 09 September 2008 18:51: On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 06:45:51PM +0100, Dave Korn

Re: New package behaviour of setup.ini

2008-09-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:00:53AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:35:23PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> I thought the next version of gcc was not going to perpetuate the >>> -mno-cygwin madness. I'd really prefer not releasing a version with >>> this option even if it

Re: New package behaviour of setup.ini

2008-09-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 09:57:54AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:00:53AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:35:23PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: I thought the next version of gcc was not going to perpetuate the -mno-cygwin madness. I

RE: New package behaviour of setup.ini

2008-09-10 Thread Dave Korn
Christopher Faylor wrote on 10 September 2008 15:06: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 09:57:54AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:00:53AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:35:23PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I thought the next version of gcc

RE: New package behaviour of setup.ini

2008-09-11 Thread Dave Korn
Christopher Faylor wrote on 10 September 2008 14:58: > I don't mean to sound ungrateful but I thought a big motivator for this > release was to remove -mno-cygwin. Having YA release with it activated > is bound to generate confusion. You will be pleasantly surprised when I update to 4.3.2 some

Re: New package behaviour of setup.ini

2008-09-11 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:27:16AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote on 10 September 2008 14:58: >>I don't mean to sound ungrateful but I thought a big motivator for this >>release was to remove -mno-cygwin. Having YA release with it activated >>is bound to generate confusion. > >Y

Re: New package behaviour of setup.ini

2008-09-12 Thread Albrecht Schlosser
Dave Korn wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote on 10 September 2008 14:58: I don't mean to sound ungrateful but I thought a big motivator for this release was to remove -mno-cygwin. Having YA release with it activated is bound to generate confusion. You will be pleasantly surprised when I updat

RE: New package behaviour of setup.ini

2008-09-12 Thread Dave Korn
Albrecht Schlosser wrote on 12 September 2008 08:51: > Dave Korn wrote: >> Christopher Faylor wrote on 10 September 2008 14:58: >> >>> I don't mean to sound ungrateful but I thought a big motivator for this >>> release was to remove -mno-cygwin. Having YA release with it activated >>> is bound t

Re: New package behaviour of setup.ini

2008-09-12 Thread Ralph Hempel
Dave Korn wrote: Will there be a simple (cross compile) replacement, as discussed previously. Yes! Write "i586-pc-mingw32-gcc" instead of "gcc -mno-cygwin" and you're done. End of story; it really will be that straightforward. I've turned this text into a .BMP file and made it my deskto