On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 04:12:43PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>> Just plain mean.
>
>I beg to differ. I think we achieve a decorated, almost baroque level of
>mean.
I stand corrected.
cgf
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 6:05 AM
> Just plain mean.
I beg to differ. I think we achieve a decorated, almost baroque level of
mean.
Rob
Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> See
>>> http://lilypond.org/cygwin/cygwin-cross.tar.gz
>>
>>Then, could someone include this link into the contributor's guide
>> http://cygwin.com/setup.html
>>and maybe links to some other scripts like that?
>
> A link to some other site
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 10:40:45AM -0800, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
>>
>> FWIW, I keep mentioning that the script that I use to generate packages
>> is available via CVS on sources.redhat.com:
>>
>> cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/cygwin-apps co mknetrel
>>
>> mkdir -p /netrel/{src,ins
>
> FWIW, I keep mentioning that the script that I use to generate packages
> is available via CVS on sources.redhat.com:
>
> cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/cygwin-apps co mknetrel
>
> mkdir -p /netrel/{src,inst,build,upload,extra}
> cd /netrel/src
> gtar xzf whatever-1.9.tar.gz
>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 02:25:36AM -0800, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
>> Not a simple script, but I've built a cardhouse of scripts that setup
>> a cross-compile environment, and then downloads and does
>> > something like
>> >cygmkpkg expat-1.95.2.tar.gz
>> this for any number of `native' pa
> Not a simple script, but I've built a cardhouse of scripts that setup
> a cross-compile environment, and then downloads and does
> > something like
> >cygmkpkg expat-1.95.2.tar.gz
> this for any number of `native' packages
>
> See
> http://lilypond.org/cygwin/cygwin-cross.tar.gz
The
Hallo Jim,
Am 2002-03-19 um 16:47 schriebst du:
> I kinda thought the people at nasm.2y.net were doing a good job of
> maintaining it
A Cygwin maintainer is one who cares about inclusion of a package in
the Cygwin dist. I don't find a Cygwin binary at this site, but thank
you anyway since
Hallo Lapo,
Am 2002-03-20 um 14:42 schriebst du:
>> As for NASM, I've seen only one program which uses it (and can compile
>> without it too) -- that's Lame. Are there more? Perhaps, some hardware
>> related tools, like CD-R burning? Video processing?
> At least UCL/UPX which is to be packaged
Stanislav Sinyagin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did someone think of developing a simple framework for making the
> packages, especially for that software which supports Cygwin and
> configure does everything for you?
Not a simple script, but I've built a cardhouse of scripts that setup
a cross
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 11:53:58PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>Please keep replies on-list.
>
>And? Your points below don't give any rational that means NASM is good
>or bad to include. There are lots of things that only a few folk use in
>cygwin already - i.e. robots.
>
>Other things also build
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
> As for the packaging, the most annoing thing (only imho, I've built only
> one package, much less than you folks) was setting correctly all
> the path names in configure options, and then packing it all with a proper
> file name.
>
> Did someone think of developing a s
> As for NASM, I've seen only one program which uses it (and can compile
> without it too) -- that's Lame. Are there more? Perhaps, some hardware
> related tools, like CD-R burning? Video processing?
At least UCL/UPX which is to be packaged soon... just see the archives 1 week ago.
--
Lapo 'Rais
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
>
> Did someone think of developing a simple framework for making the packages,
> especially for that software which supports Cygwin and configure does everything
> for you?
>
Concurrent Version Systems has an autobuild package. I haven't looked
at it yet, just found
--- Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please keep replies on-list.
sorry, sometimes mail comes with the list address in From:,
but not this time...
>
> And? Your points below don't give any rational that means NASM is good
> or bad to include. There are lots of things that only a fe
w. So that's also not a good criterion.
As for the licence, they must be open source, but that's all.
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Stanislav Sinyagin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:46 PM
> To: Robert Collins
> Subject: RE: RFP: NAS
Do they have cygwin versions? Are they interested in having it available
via setup.exe?
Rob
*shrug* they have a forum - the version compiles with cygwin without a
hitch... most recent is 0.98.22 (I'm pretty sure)
Do they have cygwin versions? Are they interested in having it available
via setup.exe?
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:47 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RFP: NASM
>
>
> I kinda th
I kinda thought the people at nasm.2y.net were doing a good job of
maintaining it
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 11:42:48AM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> > Hallo,
> >
> > Is someone willing to maintain NASM, the netwide assembler?
>
> You?
>
> Corinna
>
> --
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 11:42:48AM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> Is someone willing to maintain NASM, the netwide assembler?
You?
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROT
20 matches
Mail list logo
