Ken Brown writes:
> I'm about to upload a test release of clisp. Since it's a test
> release, I don't think you necessarily need to make a corresponding
> release of maxima. But whether you do or not, I'd appreciate it if
> you would check at some point that there's no maxima problem with the
>
Ken Brown writes:
> Sorry, I blew it. I already uploaded them with the !ready cookie. So
> our packages will be out of sync until you (or Someone™) adds the
> !ready for maxima.
No worries, I'm waiting on the upload just now.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb
On 3/15/2016 5:02 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Achim Gratz writes:
Achim Gratz writes:
I won't upload it until I get the OK from you.
Let me see when I get to that.
How about now? :-) I'm standby with the files on cygwin.com, I just
need to place the !ready cookie.
Please put your files in
Achim Gratz writes:
> Achim Gratz writes:
>>> I won't upload it until I get the OK from you.
>>
>> Let me see when I get to that.
>
> How about now? :-) I'm standby with the files on cygwin.com, I just
> need to place the !ready cookie.
Please put your files in place without the !ready cookies
Achim Gratz writes:
>> I won't upload it until I get the OK from you.
>
> Let me see when I get to that.
How about now? :-) I'm standby with the files on cygwin.com, I just
need to place the !ready cookie.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk
Ken Brown writes:
> I have a new release of clisp ready to go (x86_64 only) [*]. If I
> remember correctly, this means you will need to rebuild maxima.
I'll have to check that, but I guess yes (I'm not sure how exactly this
gets decided, but it's a new compiler and likely different configure
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 12:06:51AM +0100, Reini Urban wrote:
Just a short notice that I uploaded the following packages to sourceware.
Proper announcement when I found out how to reindex the master setup.ini
Don't touch the master setup.ini! It's automatic.
cgf
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
Some mail to the spam trap on sourceware indicates that CLISP no longer has
a Cygwin maintainer.
Is anyone interested in maintaining this?
Yep, me.
Package is ready, but I will wait until some dependent build req's are
through ITP and uploaded: fcgi, libsigsegv
Sam Steingold writes:
I think 2.34-1 should be removed.
the only difference between 2.34-1 and 2.34-2 is that 2.34-2 correctly
identifies itself as 2.34 while 2.34-1 thinks it's 2.33.84 (pretest).
but it's missing
cpari.o
pari.o
postgresql.o
from /usr/lib/clisp/full
against
* Dr. Volker Zell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-07 18:59:23 +0200]:
Sam Steingold writes:
I think 2.34-1 should be removed.
the only difference between 2.34-1 and 2.34-2 is that 2.34-2 correctly
identifies itself as 2.34 while 2.34-1 thinks it's 2.33.84 (pretest).
but it's
On Aug 4 16:18, Sam Steingold wrote:
On Aug 3 17:11, Sam Steingold wrote:
Please upload http://www.podval.org/~sds/clisp/clisp-2.34-2.tar.bz2
OK, http://www.podval.org/~sds/clisp/clisp-2.34-2-src.tar.bz2
Uploaded. Should I remove 2.33-1 or 2.34-1?
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
* Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-05 10:40:55 +0200]:
On Aug 4 16:18, Sam Steingold wrote:
On Aug 3 17:11, Sam Steingold wrote:
Please upload http://www.podval.org/~sds/clisp/clisp-2.34-2.tar.bz2
OK, http://www.podval.org/~sds/clisp/clisp-2.34-2-src.tar.bz2
Uploaded.
On Aug 5 11:29, Sam Steingold wrote:
* Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-05 10:40:55 +0200]:
On Aug 4 16:18, Sam Steingold wrote:
On Aug 3 17:11, Sam Steingold wrote:
Please upload http://www.podval.org/~sds/clisp/clisp-2.34-2.tar.bz2
OK,
On Aug 3 17:11, Sam Steingold wrote:
Please upload http://www.podval.org/~sds/clisp/clisp-2.34-2.tar.bz2
The src and setup.hint are the same.
the only reason for this update is that clisp-2.34-1.tar.bz2
identifies itself as 2.33.84.
this was a build process glitch.
Well, you should always
* Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-04 10:04:24 +0200]:
On Aug 3 17:11, Sam Steingold wrote:
Please upload http://www.podval.org/~sds/clisp/clisp-2.34-2.tar.bz2
The src and setup.hint are the same.
the only reason for this update is that clisp-2.34-1.tar.bz2
identifies itself as
Sam Steingold wrote:
But isn't that true for any scripting language?
do all scripting languages come with arbitrary length integers _and_ floats?
please compute 1000! in perl.
I guess then that the following code admits python in the Math category
too ^_^
l = 1
for i in range(2,1000):
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Lapo Luchini wrote:
[snip]
This leads me to think that maybe also categories could use a
Description, and not only single packages. This could clarify each
category meaning.
e.g. if math is things that can be used to easily do math then clisp
is in (as it is python,
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 06:55:59AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
Add a section to setup.ini that doesn't conflict with the parser logic
for:
RPM database files (future planning)
apt Releases
apt Sources
apt Packages
that provides the metadata on categories.
i.e.
section-details: Net
Visible-Name:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 06:55:59AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
Add a section to setup.ini that doesn't conflict with the parser logic
for:
RPM database files (future planning)
apt Releases
apt Sources
apt Packages
that provides the
* Dean Scarff q_fpness=omTV/[EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-20 16:12:14 +0800]:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 17:04:01 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
shells: can be your login shell (http://clisp.cons.org/clash.html)
would mean that all interpreters with a system interface (perl,
python, cint, et al)
* Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-19 14:12:32 +0200]:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 08:42:32PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
I don't think everyone wants to install it.
Thanks for the heads up. I moved it into categories Interpreters and
Devel.
actually, may I suggest
category:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:48:36AM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
* Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-19 14:12:32 +0200]:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 08:42:32PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
I don't think everyone wants to install it.
Thanks for the heads up. I moved it into
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:48:36AM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
* Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-19 14:12:32 +0200]:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 08:42:32PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
I don't think everyone wants to install it.
Thanks for the heads up. I moved it into categories
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 11:15:36AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:48:36AM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
* Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-19 14:12:32 +0200]:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 08:42:32PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
I don't think everyone wants
Sorry. I didn't make it clear. I've searched the
package listing you mention (which by the way seems
very slow). There is no mention of any lisp packages
(except the lisp sources for emacs - not much use
without a lisp system!). The main stab of my question
was the history - I don't know that much
OK. If you didn't see what you were looking for in
the package list, then the official answer to your
question is - the package does not exist. If no one
else pipes up in response to your query with information
about a private attempt to do what you're looking for,
I think it's fair to assume
26 matches
Mail list logo
