Re: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 04:12:43PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >> Just plain mean. > >I beg to differ. I think we achieve a decorated, almost baroque level of >mean. I stand corrected. cgf

RE: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-21 Thread Robert Collins
> -Original Message- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 6:05 AM > Just plain mean. I beg to differ. I think we achieve a decorated, almost baroque level of mean. Rob

Re: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-21 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> See >>> http://lilypond.org/cygwin/cygwin-cross.tar.gz >> >>Then, could someone include this link into the contributor's guide >> http://cygwin.com/setup.html >>and maybe links to some other scripts like that? > > A link to some other site

Re: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 10:40:45AM -0800, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote: >> >> FWIW, I keep mentioning that the script that I use to generate packages >> is available via CVS on sources.redhat.com: >> >> cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/cygwin-apps co mknetrel >> >> mkdir -p /netrel/{src,ins

Re: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-21 Thread Stanislav Sinyagin
> > FWIW, I keep mentioning that the script that I use to generate packages > is available via CVS on sources.redhat.com: > > cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/cygwin-apps co mknetrel > > mkdir -p /netrel/{src,inst,build,upload,extra} > cd /netrel/src > gtar xzf whatever-1.9.tar.gz >

Re: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 02:25:36AM -0800, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote: >> Not a simple script, but I've built a cardhouse of scripts that setup >> a cross-compile environment, and then downloads and does >> > something like >> >cygmkpkg expat-1.95.2.tar.gz >> this for any number of `native' pa

Re: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-21 Thread Stanislav Sinyagin
> Not a simple script, but I've built a cardhouse of scripts that setup > a cross-compile environment, and then downloads and does > > something like > >cygmkpkg expat-1.95.2.tar.gz > this for any number of `native' packages > > See > http://lilypond.org/cygwin/cygwin-cross.tar.gz The

Re: RFP: NASM

2002-03-20 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Jim, Am 2002-03-19 um 16:47 schriebst du: > I kinda thought the people at nasm.2y.net were doing a good job of > maintaining it A Cygwin maintainer is one who cares about inclusion of a package in the Cygwin dist. I don't find a Cygwin binary at this site, but thank you anyway since

Re: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-20 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Lapo, Am 2002-03-20 um 14:42 schriebst du: >> As for NASM, I've seen only one program which uses it (and can compile >> without it too) -- that's Lame. Are there more? Perhaps, some hardware >> related tools, like CD-R burning? Video processing? > At least UCL/UPX which is to be packaged

Re: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-20 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Stanislav Sinyagin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Did someone think of developing a simple framework for making the > packages, especially for that software which supports Cygwin and > configure does everything for you? Not a simple script, but I've built a cardhouse of scripts that setup a cross

Re: RFP: NASM

2002-03-20 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 11:53:58PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >Please keep replies on-list. > >And? Your points below don't give any rational that means NASM is good >or bad to include. There are lots of things that only a few folk use in >cygwin already - i.e. robots. > >Other things also build

Re: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-20 Thread Hack Kampbjørn
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote: > As for the packaging, the most annoing thing (only imho, I've built only > one package, much less than you folks) was setting correctly all > the path names in configure options, and then packing it all with a proper > file name. > > Did someone think of developing a s

Re: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-20 Thread Lapo Luchini
> As for NASM, I've seen only one program which uses it (and can compile > without it too) -- that's Lame. Are there more? Perhaps, some hardware > related tools, like CD-R burning? Video processing? At least UCL/UPX which is to be packaged soon... just see the archives 1 week ago. -- Lapo 'Rais

Re: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-20 Thread Earnie Boyd
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote: > > Did someone think of developing a simple framework for making the packages, > especially for that software which supports Cygwin and configure does everything > for you? > Concurrent Version Systems has an autobuild package. I haven't looked at it yet, just found

Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-20 Thread Stanislav Sinyagin
--- Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please keep replies on-list. sorry, sometimes mail comes with the list address in From:, but not this time... > > And? Your points below don't give any rational that means NASM is good > or bad to include. There are lots of things that only a fe

RE: RFP: NASM

2002-03-20 Thread Robert Collins
w. So that's also not a good criterion. As for the licence, they must be open source, but that's all. Rob > -Original Message- > From: Stanislav Sinyagin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:46 PM > To: Robert Collins > Subject: RE: RFP: NAS

Re: RFP: NASM

2002-03-19 Thread Jim
Do they have cygwin versions? Are they interested in having it available via setup.exe? Rob *shrug* they have a forum - the version compiles with cygwin without a hitch... most recent is 0.98.22 (I'm pretty sure)

RE: RFP: NASM

2002-03-19 Thread Robert Collins
Do they have cygwin versions? Are they interested in having it available via setup.exe? Rob > -Original Message- > From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:47 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: RFP: NASM > > > I kinda th

Re: RFP: NASM

2002-03-19 Thread Jim
I kinda thought the people at nasm.2y.net were doing a good job of maintaining it > On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 11:42:48AM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > > Hallo, > > > > Is someone willing to maintain NASM, the netwide assembler? > > You? > > Corinna > > --

Re: RFP: NASM

2002-03-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 11:42:48AM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Hallo, > > Is someone willing to maintain NASM, the netwide assembler? You? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROT

RFP: NASM

2002-03-16 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo, Is someone willing to maintain NASM, the netwide assembler? Gerrit -- =^..^=