Re: [Pre-ITP] httpd-2.0.53-0.3

2005-03-08 Thread Max Bowsher
Stipe Tolj wrote: Max Bowsher wrote: Interesting. I'm running an ApacheBench run from a linux machine on the same LAN, specifying 2 million connections, up to 100 concurrently. I'm getting some errors relating to all my ports being taken up with TIME_WAIT connections, but no other errors. I did the

Re: [Pre-ITP] httpd-2.0.53-0.3

2005-03-08 Thread Stipe Tolj
Max Bowsher wrote: I see 100% load, too, when serving lots of concurrent requests. Doesn't interfere with interactive use of the machine in most cases, so I guess that's OK really, since no one should be using Cygwin for a dedicated server anyway. I do. But only for "private playground" ;) Intere

Re: [Pre-ITP] httpd-2.0.53-0.3

2005-03-08 Thread Max Bowsher
Stipe Tolj wrote: Hi Max, Max Bowsher wrote: Preview packages of httpd-2.0.53-0.3 are available at: http://www-stud.robinson.cam.ac.uk/~mob22/cygwin/ (setup.exe installable site) Any comments welcome. first comments on a real-life long-term runtime test I do with the version you offered: Thanks! .

Re: [Pre-ITP] httpd-2.0.53-0.3

2005-03-08 Thread Stipe Tolj
Hi Max, Max Bowsher wrote: Preview packages of httpd-2.0.53-0.3 are available at: http://www-stud.robinson.cam.ac.uk/~mob22/cygwin/ (setup.exe installable site) Any comments welcome. first comments on a real-life long-term runtime test I do with the version you offered: See http://epimetheus.dev.

Re: [Pre-ITP] httpd-2.0.53-0.3

2005-02-24 Thread Stipe Tolj
Max Bowsher wrote: Oops. I forgot to document: Apache2 requires cygserver. Make sure cygserver is running, and that your CYGWIN envvar contains "server". confirming, it runs. Apache has standardized on .so - even for their native Win32 build. In any case, it really doesn't matter - you can dlopen(

Re: [Pre-ITP] httpd-2.0.53-0.3

2005-02-24 Thread Max Bowsher
Stipe Tolj wrote: Max Bowsher wrote: Max Bowsher wrote: Preview packages of httpd-2.0.53-0.3 are available at: http://www-stud.robinson.cam.ac.uk/~mob22/cygwin/ (setup.exe installable site) Any comments welcome. Updated to 0.4, fixing the postinstall bug previously mentioned, and renaming the pidf

Re: [Pre-ITP] httpd-2.0.53-0.3

2005-02-24 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Stipe Tolj wrote: > BTW, I see in /usr/lib/apach2/lib that all shared modules have .so filename > endings, which is obviously not what we want in the DLL world, right? If dlopen() is used, the libraries can be named anything, including *.so. If they are linked with statically

Re: [Pre-ITP] httpd-2.0.53-0.3

2005-02-24 Thread Stipe Tolj
Max Bowsher wrote: Max Bowsher wrote: Preview packages of httpd-2.0.53-0.3 are available at: http://www-stud.robinson.cam.ac.uk/~mob22/cygwin/ (setup.exe installable site) Any comments welcome. Updated to 0.4, fixing the postinstall bug previously mentioned, and renaming the pidfile to httpd2.pid

Re: [Pre-ITP] httpd-2.0.53-0.3

2005-02-20 Thread Max Bowsher
Max Bowsher wrote: Preview packages of httpd-2.0.53-0.3 are available at: http://www-stud.robinson.cam.ac.uk/~mob22/cygwin/ (setup.exe installable site) Any comments welcome. Updated to 0.4, fixing the postinstall bug previously mentioned, and renaming the pidfile to httpd2.pid. Max.

Re: [Pre-ITP] httpd-2.0.53-0.3

2005-02-19 Thread Max Bowsher
Max Bowsher wrote: Preview packages of httpd-2.0.53-0.3 are available at: http://www-stud.robinson.cam.ac.uk/~mob22/cygwin/ (setup.exe installable site) Any comments welcome. And, I've found 1 bug in the postinstall script already. Workaround: If you want to play with these packages, execute the fo