Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

On Apr 27 20:29, Charles Wilson wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> would you mind to build a new tcp-wrappers package exclusively for >> 1.7.0, which has IPv6 enabled? > > tcp_wrappers-7.6-5 uploaded to release-2. > > Should we announce these to cygwin-announce, or not?

Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

Corinna Vinschen wrote: would you mind to build a new tcp-wrappers package exclusively for 1.7.0, which has IPv6 enabled? tcp_wrappers-7.6-5 uploaded to release-2. Should we announce these to cygwin-announce, or not? And if so, should they be flagged in the announcement as cygwin-1.7 only

Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

On Apr 27 02:04, Charles Wilson wrote: > Charles Wilson wrote: >> Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> Cool, thanks. Btw., the openssh package I uploaded to the release-2 >>> area yesterday is already using your csih-based config scripts. >> Neat-o. Keeping fingers crossed... > > Looks like the package is

Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

Charles Wilson wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: Cool, thanks. Btw., the openssh package I uploaded to the release-2 area yesterday is already using your csih-based config scripts. Neat-o. Keeping fingers crossed... Looks like the package is missing /etc/defaults/etc/inetd.d/sshd-inetd -- Ch

Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

On Apr 25 15:28, Charles Wilson wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> Step 2 reminds me of the South Park underpants gnomes' business plan. >> Didn't see this one. Do you have a pointer to the episode? > > The Plan: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Gnomes_plan.png > > The Episode "Gnomes": > ht

Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Apr 25 13:32, Charles Wilson wrote: Ideas for cygwin-1.9 (not a new one): (1) add ld.so functionality to cygwin2.dll (2) ...miracle happens where cygwin .exe's and cygwin .dll's can simultaneously have all symbols satisfied, yet not be linked directly to DLLs other t

Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Wasn't there a guy on the cygwin ML a couple of weeks ago who claimed > to have solved the problem with unresolved symbols? There was some > shoulder patting on the list, but nothing came out of it so far, right? That would be FlexDLL:

Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

On Apr 25 13:32, Charles Wilson wrote: > Ideas for cygwin-1.9 (not a new one): > (1) add ld.so functionality to cygwin2.dll > (2) ...miracle happens where cygwin .exe's and cygwin .dll's can > simultaneously have all symbols satisfied, yet not be linked directly to > DLLs other than cygwin2.dll a

Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Apr 25 00:28, Charles Wilson wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: Cool, thanks. Btw., the openssh package I uploaded to the release-2 area yesterday is already using your csih-based config scripts. Neat-o. Keeping fingers crossed... I guess next I should turn of Addres

Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

On Apr 25 00:28, Charles Wilson wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> would you mind to build a new tcp-wrappers package exclusively for >> 1.7.0, which has IPv6 enabled? > > Fairly soon. Cool, thanks. Btw., the openssh package I uploaded to the release-2 area yesterday is al

Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

Corinna Vinschen wrote: would you mind to build a new tcp-wrappers package exclusively for 1.7.0, which has IPv6 enabled? Fairly soon. I was hoping that the setup-1.7.exe issues would get resolved soon, so that this procedure: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2008-04/msg00299.html wasn&#

tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

Hi Chuck, would you mind to build a new tcp-wrappers package exclusively for 1.7.0, which has IPv6 enabled? Thanks in advance, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat

Re: [ITP] TCP Wrappers 7.6 - New package for review

g and filtering connections to network services. Access restrictions are controlled through /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny files" | > ) category: Net | > ) requires: cygwin | > | > Actually, it looks like TCP Wrappers 7.6 is already a part of the Cygwin Net | > Release, w

Re: [ITP] TCP Wrappers 7.6 - New package for review

y files" > ) category: Net > ) requires: cygwin > > Actually, it looks like TCP Wrappers 7.6 is already a part of the Cygwin Net > Release, with the maintainer listed as Prentis Brooks. 7.6-1 was committed > on June 26, 2002. > > If this was meant as a re-packaging,

Re: [ITP] TCP Wrappers 7.6 - New package for review

ections to network services." ) ldesc: "Tool for monitoring and filtering connections to network services. Access restrictions are controlled through /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny files" ) category: Net ) requires: cygwin Actually, it looks like TCP Wrappers 7.6 is already

[ITP] TCP Wrappers 7.6 - New package for review

I've made a Cygwin Net release from the existing port by Prentis Brooks at ftp://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pc/gnuwin32/porters/Brooks_Prentis/tcp_wrap.tar.gz Please review. http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/tcp-wrappers-7.6-1-src.tar.bz http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/tcp-wrappers-7.6-1.ta

Re: TCP Wrappers

Either way, I am going to work on it. It will be a good exercise in creating DLL's for Cygwin. My only concern is that I am not sure how active the upstream maintainer is. If you check the porcupine site, tcp wrappers hasn't been modified since 1997. Of course, not that many changes

Re: TCP Wrappers

Corinna Vinschen wrote: > It clarifies. I was just confused how inetd comes into play here. > > Just consider that if the usage of a tcp wrappers dll actually > requires us to change sshd code, I'd better live with static linking. > libwrap.a isn't that big. All true

Re: TCP Wrappers

. > > > > Does that clarify or have I muddied the water further? > > It clarifies. I was just confused how inetd comes into play here. > > Just consider that if the usage of a tcp wrappers dll actually > requires us to change sshd code, I'd better live with stati

Re: TCP Wrappers

H. > > Does that clarify or have I muddied the water further? It clarifies. I was just confused how inetd comes into play here. Just consider that if the usage of a tcp wrappers dll actually requires us to change sshd code, I'd better live with static linking. libwrap.a isn't t

Re: TCP Wrappers

the dll. You don't even > have to change ssh's makefile since the Cygwin ld links against the > dll first, if available. > > However, I've found a problem when sshd is linked against tcp wrappers > but AFAICS it's a flaw in Cygwin. > > Corinna > &

Re: TCP Wrappers

hange ssh's makefile since the Cygwin ld links against the dll first, if available. However, I've found a problem when sshd is linked against tcp wrappers but AFAICS it's a flaw in Cygwin. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to

Re: TCP Wrappers

settled down in a few weeks, I think I will > release a new OpenSSH package with tcp-wrappers support. > > > Thanks, > Corinna > > -- Prentis Brooks | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 703-265-0914 | AIM: PrentisBrooks Senior System Administrator - Web Infrastructure & Security

Re: TCP Wrappers

in a few weeks, I think I will release a new OpenSSH package with tcp-wrappers support. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.

Re: TCP Wrappers

As you wish *grin* http://www.stonegard.com/cygwin/tcp_wrappers_7.6/tcp_wrappers-7.6-1-src.tar.bz2 http://www.stonegard.com/cygwin/tcp_wrappers_7.6/tcp_wrappers-7.6-1.tar.bz2 http://www.stonegard.com/cygwin/tcp_wrappers_7.6/setup.hint # TCP Wrappers sdesc: "TCP Wrappers, Tool to provide

Re: TCP Wrappers

On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:23:35AM -0400, Prentis Brooks wrote: > Ok, the packages are now ready for someone to upload them to the > distribution. Sorry for the delay, work and life intruded with a > vengence. Let me know if there is anything still missing, I pretty > much, just did as Charles W

TCP Wrappers

Ok, the packages are now ready for someone to upload them to the distribution. Sorry for the delay, work and life intruded with a vengence. Let me know if there is anything still missing, I pretty much, just did as Charles Wilson suggested (thanks for the script Charles). I will be working with

Re: TCP Wrappers

gt;>>>Hey Guys, what is the status of the TCP Wrapper upload? I got an email > >>>>> > >>>>>from Rob stating that he had problems getting to the files, I fixed the > >>>> > >>>>>problem and responded, but no word since. > &

Re: TCP Wrappers

On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 06:49:43PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > As is, the -src package will build the static lib and create the > executables without problems. It is probably okay -- once you've tested > the build and checked functionality -- to call that "tcp_wrappers-7.6-1" > as is, witho

Re: TCP Wrappers

I fixed the >>>> >>>>>problem and responded, but no word since. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>I've uploaded it to the contrib area. I took the freedom to rename >>>>the package from "tcp_wrappers_7.6..." to "tcp_wrappers-7.6...", just >>>>a dash instead of an underscore in front of the version number. >>>> >>>>Prepare to announce in a few hours. >>>> >>>>Btw., IMHO it would be really nice to get libwrap as a DLL in a near >>>>future. I'd like to link OpenSSH dynamically against tcp wrappers... >>>> >>>>Thanks, >>>>Corinna >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >

Re: TCP Wrappers

n or maybe it was you who asked for it. Basically, here is > >the situation, TCP Wrappers only has a single Makefile, no configure or > >libtool (understand, I am not completely understanding all of the > >components involved with building the dll). If I understood the > >previo

Re: TCP Wrappers

On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 02:53:23PM -0500, Prentis Brooks wrote: >Ok, maybe I just misunderstood your replies to someone asking for >dll'ization or maybe it was you who asked for it. Basically, here is >the situation, TCP Wrappers only has a single Makefile, no configure or >li

Re: TCP Wrappers

gt;a dash instead of an underscore in front of the version number. > >> > >>Prepare to announce in a few hours. > >> > >>Btw., IMHO it would be really nice to get libwrap as a DLL in a near > >>future. I'd like to link OpenSSH dynamically against tc

Re: TCP Wrappers

wh, I am going to have fun this weekend ;) On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Charles Wilson wrote: > Mostly correct. Unfortnately, libwrap is bad. It uses an int > (allow_severity and deny_severity) that are expected to be defined in > the application (so, tcpd.h says 'extern int allow_severity'). >

Re: TCP Wrappers

Ok, maybe I just misunderstood your replies to someone asking for dll'ization or maybe it was you who asked for it. Basically, here is the situation, TCP Wrappers only has a single Makefile, no configure or libtool (understand, I am not completely understanding all of the components inv

Re: TCP Wrappers

On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 01:28:25PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > I've whipped up a repackaged version of your -src, that follows the > approved conventions. Also, it uses a shell script to control building, > and installs the man pages, header file, has a postinstall script to > create /etc/h

Re: TCP Wrappers

gt; >>Prepare to announce in a few hours. >> >>Btw., IMHO it would be really nice to get libwrap as a DLL in a near >>future. I'd like to link OpenSSH dynamically against tcp wrappers... >> >>Thanks, >>Corinna >> >> >> >

Re: TCP Wrappers

Mostly correct. Unfortnately, libwrap is bad. It uses an int (allow_severity and deny_severity) that are expected to be defined in the application (so, tcpd.h says 'extern int allow_severity'). This is okay in a static lib, but not in a DLL. instead, stuff must be changed around so that the

Re: TCP Wrappers

On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 06:31:43PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:24:53AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >> The -src package is incorrected packaged: >> >> usr/doc/Cygwin/ >> usr/doc/Cygwin/tcp_wrappers_7.6.README >> usr/src/ >> usr/src/tcp_wrappers_7.6/ >> usr/src/tcp_w

Re: TCP Wrappers

On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 12:37:25PM -0500, Prentis Brooks wrote: > I am willing to look into this, it currently does not use libtool, so I > have a lot of mods to make that happen, if I understood cgf right. I don't remember saying this. It *should* be as simple as saying gcc -Wl,--export-all-sy

Re: TCP Wrappers

to get libwrap as a DLL in a near > future. I'd like to link OpenSSH dynamically against tcp wrappers... > > Thanks, > Corinna > > -- Prentis Brooks | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 703-265-0914 | AIM: PrentisBrooks Senior System Administrator - Web Infrastructure & Security

Re: TCP Wrappers

Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>Also, the name should be 'tcp_wrappers-7.6-REL...'; the package release >>version is missing. >> > > Agh! I'm sorry. I'm still not really back from vacation, apparently. > > Can I remove the package and keep the directory and setup.exe is still > happy? Sure --

Re: TCP Wrappers

On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:24:53AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > The -src package is incorrected packaged: > > usr/doc/Cygwin/ > usr/doc/Cygwin/tcp_wrappers_7.6.README > usr/src/ > usr/src/tcp_wrappers_7.6/ > usr/src/tcp_wrappers_7.6/Banners.Makefile > usr/src/tcp_wrappers_7.6/BLURB > usr/src/tc

Re: TCP Wrappers

underscore in front of the version number. > > Prepare to announce in a few hours. > > Btw., IMHO it would be really nice to get libwrap as a DLL in a near > future. I'd like to link OpenSSH dynamically against tcp wrappers... > > Thanks, > Corinna > >

Re: TCP Wrappers

n a near future. I'd like to link OpenSSH dynamically against tcp wrappers... Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.

TCP Wrappers

Hey Guys, what is the status of the TCP Wrapper upload? I got an email from Rob stating that he had problems getting to the files, I fixed the problem and responded, but no word since. -- Prentis Brooks | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 703-265-0914 | AIM: PrentisBrooks Senior System Administrator - Web

TCP Wrappers (fwd)

Just checking, but were you able to get to the package? -- Prentis Brooks | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 703-265-0914 | AIM: PrentisBrooks Senior System Administrator - Web Infrastructure & Security A knight is sworn to valor. His heart knows only virtue. His blade defends the helpless.

RE: TCP Wrappers

2002, Robert Collins wrote: > "Directory Listing Denied" > > Rob > > > -Original Message- > > From: Prentis Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 12:04 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: TCP Wrappers >

RE: TCP Wrappers

"Directory Listing Denied" Rob > -Original Message- > From: Prentis Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 12:04 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: TCP Wrappers > > > Ok, that was two votes ;) > > I have been usi

RE: TCP Wrappers

I'd love to see it. > -Original Message- > From: Prentis Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 8:04 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: TCP Wrappers > > > Ok, that was two votes ;) > > I have been using the code for se

TCP Wrappers

Ok, that was two votes ;) I have been using the code for several months now, so I am pretty confident with it. The packages can be downloaded from http://www.stonegard.com/cygwin/ Let me know when you have gotten them, or should I get access to push them up myself somehow? -- Prentis Brooks

RE: TCP Wrappers

Looks fine to me. Rob > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 6:53 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: TCP Wrappers > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 02:18:38PM -0500, Prentis Brooks wrote:

Re: TCP Wrappers

On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 02:18:38PM -0500, Prentis Brooks wrote: >Hey Chris, > I didn't see any comments on the setup.hint, is what I have >compliant? If so, can we consider the package ready for upload once >Robert has time to get it? I think the setup.hint looked fine. I'd like someone

TCP Wrappers

Hey Chris, I didn't see any comments on the setup.hint, is what I have compliant? If so, can we consider the package ready for upload once Robert has time to get it? -- Prentis Brooks | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 703-265-0914 | AIM: PrentisBrooks Senior System Administrator - Web Infrastruct

Re: tcp wrappers

Prentis Brooks wrote: > Hrmmm I will look into it, I am sure there is some efficiency gained > from making it a DLL. Would packages that are built against libwrap > automatically use the DLL if it is available, or would they need to be > tweaked as well (ie sshd is compiled such that if li

Re: tcp wrappers

olize --force -c > >aclocal ( possibly need to add '-I some-subdir') > >automake --force -a > >autoconf > > > >And then configure/make as usual -- an poof! DLL AND static lib. > > I don't think that tcp wrappers uses configure or libtool, though.

Re: tcp wrappers

it to make use of host.allow files). On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Charles Wilson wrote: > Prentis Brooks wrote: > > > >>Hmm. I wonder if it would be worthwhile to make the wrapper library a > >>DLL. > >> > > > > I would rather we didn't, primar

Re: tcp wrappers

a >autoconf > >And then configure/make as usual -- an poof! DLL AND static lib. I don't think that tcp wrappers uses configure or libtool, though. Or it didn't the last time I looked at it. >Okay, maybe it's not QUITE that easy, but it's close. You do need to

Re: tcp wrappers

Prentis Brooks wrote: >>Hmm. I wonder if it would be worthwhile to make the wrapper library a >>DLL. >> > > I would rather we didn't, primarily because the modification to make tcp > wrappers work with Cygwin was simplistic. In fact, at this point the > m

Re: tcp wrappers

w > > ready for upload. > > Can you repost the setup.hint? Chuck made some observations on the last > one that you posted so I'd like to see what you have now. > > Hmm. I wonder if it would be worthwhile to make the wrapper library a > DLL. I would rather we didn

Re: tcp wrappers

Not a problem, here it is: # TCP Wrappers sdesc: "TCP Wrappers, Tool to provide host based access restrictions in tcp services" ldesc: "TCP Wrappers, With this package you can monitor and filter incoming requests for the SYSTAT, FINGER, FTP, TELNET, RLOGIN, RSH, EXEC, TFTP,

Re: tcp wrappers

On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 10:09:57AM -0500, Prentis Brooks wrote: >Ok, gang, > I finally got the time to finish up the build so that I had all > the pieces defined in the contributor's document. It is now > ready for upload. Can you repost the setup.hint? Chuck made some observa

tcp wrappers

Ok, gang, I finally got the time to finish up the build so that I had all the pieces defined in the contributor's document. It is now ready for upload. -- Prentis Brooks | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 703-265-0914 | AIM: PrentisBrooks Senior System Administrator - Web Infrastru

Re: TCP Wrappers

over the setup.html file and built up the src and binary > > packages. Writing up the setup.hint file now. I have the following: > > > > # TCP Wrappers > > @ tcp_wrappers_7.6 > > This line is not necessary -- it is created in setup.ini by the upset > script; it d

Re: TCP Wrappers

Prentis Brooks wrote: > Alright, > finally read over the setup.html file and built up the src and binary > packages. Writing up the setup.hint file now. I have the following: > > # TCP Wrappers > @ tcp_wrappers_7.6 This line is not necessary -- it is created i

TCP Wrappers

Alright, finally read over the setup.html file and built up the src and binary packages. Writing up the setup.hint file now. I have the following: # TCP Wrappers @ tcp_wrappers_7.6 sdesc: "TCP Wrappers" ldesc: "TCP Wrappers: Tool to provide host based access restrictio