Re: Waiting for xfree86? [Was: guile-1.6.4-1]

2003-07-22 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:25:51PM -0500, Brian Ford wrote: > I compile the program stuff.exe that depends upon the non-rebuilt dll > foo.dll. No interfaces between stuff.exe and foo.dll were changed in > 1.5.0, but foo.dll calls lseek. > > Now, when lseek in foo.dll is resolved at link time with

Re: Waiting for xfree86? [Was: guile-1.6.4-1]

2003-07-22 Thread Brian Ford
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 15:54:29 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 08:17:44PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > >>Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Why are we waiting for these libraries? Do they export variables or >>> functions which rely on new 64 bi

Re: Waiting for xfree86? [Was: guile-1.6.4-1]

2003-07-21 Thread Charles Wilson
Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 08:17:44PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > >> Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >>> Why are we waiting for these libraries? Do they export variables or >>> functions which rely on new 64 bit types? >> >> >> I haven't investi

Re: Waiting for xfree86? [Was: guile-1.6.4-1]

2003-07-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 08:17:44PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: >Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Why are we waiting for these libraries? Do they export variables or >> functions which rely on new 64 bit types? > >I haven't investigated that. It's just that they are listed i

Re: Waiting for xfree86? [Was: guile-1.6.4-1]

2003-07-21 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why are we waiting for these libraries? Do they export variables or > functions which rely on new 64 bit types? I haven't investigated that. It's just that they are listed in: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg07117.html as c

Re: Waiting for xfree86? [Was: guile-1.6.4-1]

2003-07-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 06:48:35PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: >Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > I think it makes sense to upload 1.5.0 versions of both packages >> > together. But lilypond also depends on tetex, and tetex is still >> > waiting for tiff and XFree. >> >> Tha

Waiting for XFree86? [Was: guile-1.6.4-1]

2003-07-21 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think it makes sense to upload 1.5.0 versions of both packages > > together. But lilypond also depends on tetex, and tetex is still > > waiting for tiff and XFree. > > That's a problem since Harold decided to wait for 1.5.0 becoming the > offici